Can we disallow posts with "BREAKING" in the title?
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
524 points (99.2% liked)
politics
28181 readers
2852 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Also "slams" and "roasts"
Wexner does not surprise me at all having known people who worked for/around him and his properties.
Wexner's name has been closely attached with Epstein all along. For some reason nobody can fathom, Wexner put Epstein in charge of his investments. There was speculation at one time that Epstein's fortune was embezzled from Wexner, but it seems to get more complicated than that.
Wexner started Bath &Body Works, Victoria's Secret, Abercrombie & Fitch, Express, and others
I assumed since day one he also had a blackmail business. It’s a classic mafia/russia move. Give someone a girl, record it, blackmail them.
So now that these names are named, wouldn't it be easier to sue to government for illegally redacting them as they weren't legitimate names to be redacted?
It's harder when you don't have the names.
Not that anything will happen even if it does... but in a sane world, it would right?
I don't know how the law works on this, but it's so fucked up that they carefully redacted these guys while exposing several of the victim's names. It's pretty clear who the FBI and DOJ work for and it isn't the American people.
I've seen Massie and Ro Khanna on several independent media interviews, and both of them have said that the way the law works is that there are no redactions allowed for anyone but the victims, nothing else is supposed to be redacted but the victims' names, so the government is totally breaking the law.
Maybe so. But so far everyone is DC is perfectly fine and turn the other way anytime diddlin Donnie and his friends do something illegal.
What about the dog whose name they redacted?
For the uninformed among us, who are these people?
Who are those again? Victims or perps?
Sulayem was def an evil pedophile
Here you go Qsheep. Here's your cabal. Now, like, make good on all your conspiracy rage and demand justice.
Qsheep bleet only at those they are told to bleet at. MAGA loves pedophiles, so there will be no sheepish bleeting rage.
While I somewhat share your contempt for them, you don't give them enough credit. It's only the lack of leadership that prevents them, and us, from demanding justice.
They are not the problem, the people setting us up against them are.
I see what you are saying; however, these MAGA followers are the problem. I regrettably have to deal with them on a daily basis. They are not all dumb, but they like being told what to think from higher ups, but HATE being told what to do. They seem to want a king to worship. Trump was NOT lying when he said he could shoot someone and still get elected. The MAGA sheep need a shepard, if you ever notice ... when Trump starts giving MAGA orders he loses control. It is really hard to describe. One of these days there will be students learning about this "Trump Syndrome" in psych 101, right after the chapter with the Milgram experiment
I'm pretty sure these are just the ones they were willing to put up for sacrifice...
Yeah over 50% of the files no matter how you size them up are still unreleased. I bet there is a lot there.
Not to mention the FBI did most of the redacting back in March before they handed off the documents to the DOJ, so the DOJ would have the ability to claim they acted according to the law “to the best of their ability” 🙄
Still a good start
This article has some more detail on some of the men. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/10/six-men-epstein-files-unredacted
Don't forget Trump x 1 million
It feels like they're selecting names and hiding others. If they are just going to say the names why redact them for the public in the files?
If you listen to what he says, the FBI redacted all the files before passing them to the DOJ. The DOJ was only able to release the versions of what they actually had.
Ro went to the FBI to see the originals, but it's not like he could comprehensively hunt through the 3 million files. It sounds like he just pulled out names of people that he found that were mentioned in particularly damaging documents that were redacted only to keep their own names clean.
It'll take a much larger effort to comprehensively go through with proper redactions of victim info, without hiding perps.
He had said that he was only able to view 30 or 40 pages in the time he had
He also said in an earlier video that the files were setup like a SCIF which means no writing things down to remember them later. At some point I would start forgetting names as I found new ones.
I saw reported somewhere that they were allowed to take notes, they just couldn't remove or scan/photograph any documents. Don't know how true that is though so take it for what it's worth.
You can take notes in a SCIF, you just can't take your notes out of the SCIF.
Oh hey now don’t go being reasonable. Didn’t you get the memo? We’re all just supposed to throw up our hands and say nothing is going to happen and then just sit here being angry but not active. /s
Thanks for the common sense perspective. I didn't see it. I hope we get more and more until everything crumbles.
Make good headline but keep donors onboard
Yeah,I believe this info, but why these names in particular? And how does he have access to this info in particular to reveal?
They will be punished the same way Elon Musk, Donal Trump and Bill Gates were punished.
Fuck the people raping and grooming and pimping people... But I just want to add the reminder to this topic that there are things bigger than trafficking going on within this all. Sadly in the grand scheme, globally too, the trafficking is probably only a small part of the evil.
The trafficking could possibly the "best case scenario" in terms of these people and their acts of manipulation towards the human species.
Google translate says this Russian who has toured the world is named Zurab Mikeladze. https://en.chelopera.ru/people/about/zurab-mikeladze/
More!
Well I was dead wrong. When I was psychotic after my TBI in 2022 I put my own version of the Epstein List on Github. It's still there, a private repository that's basically a schizophrenic nightmare, lmao. It's an interesting rabbit hole to go down if you're interested in what happens to you when you smoke a bunch of weed right after getting a traumatic brain injury.
But anyways, yeah, I was off about Epstein, and I do not seem to have gotten any of the names right. I had Guy Fieri, Kanye West, Pete Davidson, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, Donald Trump, Travis Barker? lmao
I'm pretty sure you got a couple right. This post isn't a definitive list; just an extremely small sample.
Hope you're feeling better - something was pretty wrong if you were grouping Guy Fieri in.
I dunno man, someone that clean has gotta be dirty.
“After extensive ~~waterboarding~~ enhanced margaritas we found out that, quote, ‘Sammy Hagar likes poblano peppers.’”
load more comments
(3 replies)
To be fair, Yeezy went off the deep end so I’ll give your baked and brain-damaged self half a point for that one
load more comments
(2 replies)
Kanye is on some list somewhere for sure haha
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›