this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
298 points (98.4% liked)

Selfhosted

57021 readers
873 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pretty much what it says on the tin, but for more context. My friends and I use Discord to play D&D and other TTRPGs. We also use it to send memes and just have conversations. We mostly do the chat, text, images, gifs, etc. But we also use the voice and video chat pretty regularly too. Screen share sometimes as well. So I'd like to try to find something that has all those features if possible.

The new ID or facial recognition requirement they are implementing is a deal breaker for a few of us, and so if I can set up some kind of alternative to make it a non-issue, I'd like to.

I'm running Ubunutu 22.04 LETS, AMD 3700X, 64GBRAM, 10x 6TB HDD, and and 2 4TB NVmE. Have a 2gb up/down internet connection. So I don't think we should have any issues making it work smoothly for 7 people.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] greyscale@lemmy.sdf.org 112 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

The main issue is you'll never get the cretins that use it off it. Communities.. they're just sitting there burning the library of alexandria.. all the esoteric knowledge they're "putting on discord" is just gonna vanish.

over a billion in vc funding and discord is as shit as it is.

[–] xvertigox@lemmy.world 53 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

As an archivist and data hoarder I hate discord with a burning, visceral passion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's funny you mention the VC funding. As far as I can tell, it's only made it worse. Discord would have done great if they just kept expectations low. Instead, they're now expected to create massive returns. That must come at the cost of consumers. I hope consumers get tired of it and leave, or someone else comes offering the simple service Discord used to provide.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ollie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

matrix is unreasonably hard to set-up, why doesnt the docker container or the compose include voice chat? i cant even sign up for stoat to try it out.. is this the best we have against discord in the big 26 😭

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Voice chat works out of the box with Matrix.

It uses WebRTC and tries to do P2P connections. Note that this leaks your IP to the other caller and vice versa, but it's also quite fast as you can establish a direct connection.

If P2P fails it will try to fallback to your configured TURN server and use that one for relaying.

However not every instance has one (as TURN servers are usually not that modern and straight forward...) and if this is the case it will fallback to Matrix's global TURN servers.

[–] aksdb@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

XMPP is also still a thing and IMO much easier to host (at least ejabberd is). Look into Movim, which looks quite nice as a discord replacement on top of XMPP.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TerHu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I‘ve been looking into this a bit and whilst i haven’t really tried any of the alternatives, i did collect some notes:

possible contenders

  • zulip
    • apache-2.0 self hosted more work focussed
  • stoatchat (formerly revolt)
    • AGPL-3 self hosted
  • teamspeak
    • proprietary ... self hosted older ts3 with ts6 announced
  • mumble
    • license seems foss - self hosted
  • spacebar
    • AGPL-3 self hosted
  • return to irc or xmpp

probably no

  • matrix - could not decryptinator
    • a hassle regarding voice
  • peersuite

DO NOT

  • mattermost
    • play stupid games, win stupid prices
  • guilded
    • owned by roblox
  • slack
  • discord
  • ventrilo
    • proprietary - not selfhosted - no linux

please let me know what y’all think

[–] dude@lemmings.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most of the possible contenders lack video calls and some also other needs mentioned by the OP. Nextcloud Talk has them all

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blueworld@piefed.world 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

There another thread about discord requiring a face scan next month,so I think alternatives might start getting pushed.

Such as https://stoat.chat/

Edit: Not sure you can self-host it, but it does have a back end server listed in it's source code with a docker, however it might just be for code testing.

Right RTFM... https://github.com/stoatchat/self-hosted yes you can self-hosted it.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To create an invite you:

# drop into mongo shell
docker compose exec database mongosh

# create the invite
use revolt
db.invites.insertOne({ _id: "enter_an_invite_code_here" })

That's pretty jank.

Also - I'm getting pretty fed-up with self-hosting documentation that assumes very specific environments and goes into detailed configuration for that environment. Don't tell me how to setup a server and how to enable/configure SSH and setup UFW as part of setting up your software. Just tell me how to setup your software and what ports it uses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Wait, requiring a face scan of everyone?? I know they started doing that as an age verification thing for some people, but everyone?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quaff@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Check out https://stoat.chat/, it's the closest self hostable group communications platform to Discord.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just a fair warning in reply to this that the self-hosted version of Stoat doesn't currently have voice chat. It's an open issue that's currently paused until they can finish their rework.

If you have the skill for it, it seems like you can patch work the existing voice chat back in, but it's not part of their initial setup and there's no instructions on how to do so properly

[–] quaff@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Link to their voice chat implementatoon.

Looks like you can enable it on self hosted version. Probably worth someone trying it out personally. Before giving up on stoat.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

sadly, it's a little more complex than just enabling it. The supported self host deployment uses docker, and the docker containers that are available don't contain the interfaces for voice or video calling as they are not up to date.

If I understand it right, to enable it would mean you need to either pull the source yourself and run it off of docker, or make a custom docker image using a version of stoat web that contains the ability to do voice calls.

reading the draft of the linked issue, it looks like the author isn't doing voice call for the reason that they don't know the proper way to integrate it into the docker image.

So to answer it: yes it looks like you can use voice servers on the current self hosted model, but you can't use pre-existing docker images, and it will require you to manually add the new web UI in and patch where needed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hesh@quokk.au 21 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Honestly the name choice adds difficulty in getting friends to take it seriously. Why did they pick "stoat"

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nowadays everyone accepted the name "Discord" but I think it's a pretty poor choice of branding too.

A communication app called Discord is pretty weird too.

A stoat is a pretty cool animal.

I think without prior knowledge of any voice chat Discord would probably rate worse in perception than Stoat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quaff@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No clue! It was revolt before. I think they had trademark issues with that name. What's wrong with stoat?

[–] ttyybb@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I was wondering why I want getting any updates, checked thegithub a few months ago and found out they rebranded. Haven't had a chance to try the latest version out yet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 14 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

you mean unlike the tools discord has replaced, such as "mumble", "ventrilo", "roger wilco" and "trillian"?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Back in my day, (shakes cane), Teamspeak and Ventrillo were the big voice chat platforms/tools. Both have text chat and channels/rooms; but their focus is voice chat for gaming.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ventrillo.

Dammit, son, makin' me feel old now

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ati@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago

What's that you say? IRC?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

TeamSpeek or Mumble.

Both have excellent voice chat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 weeks ago
[–] SystemL@literature.cafe 19 points 2 weeks ago

Surprised no one has said it yet, but matrix.

[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Matrix hoster here.

I would recommend Matrix as it has pretty much everything, including cross platform clients, threads, voice/video calls, screensharing, spaces (aka servers), federation and E2EE. Matrix also has bridges for Discord and pretty much every other service so this could ease transition...

But self hosting requires reading the docs and having some in depth knowledge and understanding as it can be quite complex.

I would recommend just creating a Matrix account on one of the common global servers and testing it.

If you want to self-host there are some pre-defined setups available (example) but I would still recommend to bring at least 5-10 hours.

Regarding operations: It's really resilient and barely ever breaks and also doesn't need a lot of resources. A 1-2vCPU server with under 1GB RAM server is enough for less than 10 people.

[–] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You se knowledgeable on this, so I hope you'll allow me to ask this.

I don't know anything about Discord, but I selfhost the Mattermost chat system for my family. They, too, are narrowing the free tier.

Can Matrix replace Mattermost for a family? Several separate "rooms" for various topics, plus 1-to-1 chats.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] klymilark@herbicide.fallcounty.omg.lol 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

IRC, RocketChat, Slack. Technically Matrix, but for your usecase I wouldn't recommend it, as it's a bit heavy, and if you're just planning on using it with other people on the same server there's not a point.

EDIT: Just noticed the voice chat thing. I've used Jitsi for that, and it works well. Also self-hostable

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Jitsi is great as a Skype/Zoom replacement. It's not a 'room' on a server, but voice and video chats are stable and fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 15 points 2 weeks ago

https://github.com/spacebarchat/spacebarchat

Literally reverse engineered discord, made open source.

[–] Novocirab@feddit.org 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

The Mastodon founder, Eugen Rochko, has just announced that "We’ve moved our internal communications from Discord to Zulip at Mastodon".

https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/116041405748460511

Zulip is probably more focused toward work than TTRPGs, but it can't hurt to try it. (I haven't tried it personally, yet.) It is self-hostable.

https://zulip.com/

[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Zulip is great… on a PC. On mobile is a totally different thing, and not in a good way. 😕

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, we're using Conversations and it's fine for most things.

Will be self hosting prosidy "sooon"... and it'll all be in-house.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] helios@social.ggbox.fr 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My guess is that it would be difficult to find a piece of software that does all the stuff discord does. But I also think it's a non-issue. You could split these needs onto multiple solutions. My group uses mumble for gaming voicechat, Signal for group conversations, and a simple rtmp server for streaming. We don't need nor use discord and never did.

I like the idea of a single piece of software that does one job well instead of a giant powerhouse that does everything.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I still use IRC. There are now modern web clients like The Lounge or Convos that can display/share images in the channels, keep history and push notifications. Apparently Convos can do video chat but I never tried it. Unfortunately I'm not aware of screen sharing features for any of these.

So on a very simple setup, you need an IRC server, then install and connect one of those clients to your server, and use them through a web browser, either on a computer or on a phone.

It's obviously not entirely Discord-like, but it is a simple way to chat and share images.

[–] cosmicrose@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Matrix is an option but it’s slow and breaks all the time. I’m a big fan of XMPP myself but good luck convincing anyone else to make an account 😔

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Dont knock matrix for being slow, it updates just as fast as anyone else's network speed is and it is focused on encryption and security. Given [gestures broadly to everything these days] people moving away from major platforms should really take into account their digital footprint and privacy.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Actionschnils@feddit.org 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

We switched to element (matrix-protocol) a while ago. Until now it worked fine for us - without any real problems. It already got a native voice/video-call implementation. But i heard that selfhosting isnt that smooth

https://element.io/de

load more comments (3 replies)

I would take a look at TeamSpeak or Matrix.

Of the two Matrix is probably the closest to Discord.

[–] Wawe@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I replaced Discord(and Whatsapp) with Matrix/Element as voice chat (and general chat) with my wife. I remember running it with Docker was bit annoying to set up (I was selfhosting beginner when first doing it now it could be easier), but with Yunohost it is one click install (if you are willing with swap operating server).

Nextcloud Talk could work for your needs, but I have not personally used it so hard to recommend it.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 9 points 2 weeks ago

Something that wasn't posted here yet but I just got told about: https://fluxer.app/

A chat platform that answers to you, not investors. It's ad-free, open source, community-funded, and never sells your data or nags you with upgrade pop-ups.

Over time, we'd love to explore optional monetisation tools that help creators and communities earn, with a small, transparent fee that keeps the app sustainable.

[–] cenotaph@piefed.zip 8 points 2 weeks ago

teamspeak6 is in beta right now but it is my replacement for discord. Check it out, supports most anything people have used disc for

load more comments
view more: next ›