this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
187 points (97.0% liked)

politics

28024 readers
3202 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Substance_P@lemmy.world 112 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Congress is literally letting fascism happen. Trump needs to be impeached now! His adviser Steve Bannon has told us they are going to employ voter intimidation tactics. On his podcast he said, “We’re going to have ICE surround the polls come November”.

[–] borkborkbork@piefed.social 2 points 13 hours ago

Chickenshit Republicans in Congress, yeah. How many times to they have to impeach to get those fuckheads to wake up and smell the treason?

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (5 children)

They don't have enough of their gestapo goons to stop us from voting. They are saying desperate bullshit now because they know they are going to lose.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I hope you're right, but they don't need to stop everyone.

There are usually key election spots and targeting those is all they'd have to do, they certainly have enough for that.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This isn't an everywhere strategy, it's a targeted one.

For example, doing this heavily in Fulton county (ATL) would pretty much guarantee that Georgia goes red this time.

They only have to identify a handful of purple states, and then throw everything they have at disrupting voting in their major cities.

And this won't be the only thing that they do, for example they're working on mandating a nationwide real ID requirement for voting, which would prevent literally tens of millions of people from voting.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

In every one of those locations, the voting populace will vastly outnumber those gestapo pigs too. We just have to show up with numbers and they will not be able to do jack shit.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People have no idea how much goes into every American voting in the same 12 hour window...

Like ICE is big, but the amount of voting locations is insane. Even if ICE focuses on Blue cities, it's hard to find a polling location in a major city that's not less than a mile from another. They're all over the damn place and there's now way they can cover them all

People are stressed and not thinking logically, which is exactly what trump and the oligarchs work.

Also I suspect that their actual plan is to declare fraud and try to force their candidates, but I suspect that's more likely to result in Republican candidates having UN Owen was her played with their skull by state troopers if they try to force the situation well either that or a nullification crisis.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I guess you haven't yet realized that every single law enforcement officer in America is on the same team as these guys.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know a police chief who hates Trump with a burning passion. Stop thinking they are all like Arpaio.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Want about a million counter examples?

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

You say every one, someone else says there are exceptions, you say obviously but this is true for most of them, they say yeah that’s fair, and nothing of substance is added to the discussion. Why not skip that whole rigamarole and just start with “the vast majority” or “nearly every one” instead of unnecessarily hyperbolizing?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

They don't have enough of them either. They are like a fraction of a percent of the overall population. They ain't gonna stop us.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

We'll see. They have been pulling this fascist bullshit for a century and no one has stopped them yet.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No, this bullshit is pretty different from business as usual. It's quite important that everyone understands that.

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Want a list of people that have been killed by the border patrol that you didn't give a shit about?

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Yes go ahead and list every one of them. I'll print it out and mail it to the Give A Shit headquarters posthaste.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, but they might have enough to send to purple/blue areas to scare non-white demographics to stay away and sway the elections.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

If you're in one of these areas, take action. Contact your local, state, and federal reps to ensure polling place integrity. Sign up to work the polls. Volunteer to escort people to the polls, especially if you're a white male.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago

Impeachment is political process. If they remove him — that will be more worthwhile. I doubt they will.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Need to get 1M plus Americans who believe in democracy to sign up to stand at every single polling station in the nation and defend what they believe in - the free vote.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 hours ago

Not going to happen. My health insurance.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

This country has very limited impeachment and recall mechanisms. It practically hasn't evolved past its 18th century framing and it seems the GOP has finally found enough holes in the government to forego any semblance of democracy. Legislation can be stopped dead in its tracks with just a handful of people. If Trump is to somehow be stopped this time, anyone else can just keep tearing at the fabric of this government until it fails completely. The only solution that even makes sense is to rewrite the Constitution to better deal with more modern and sophisticated threats but that seems about as popular as the word "socialism".

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

And yet people continue to have the delusion that the rules will magically protect them. What don't people understand about rules needing to be enforced?

[–] whereIsTamara@lemmy.org 34 points 1 day ago

TLDR; he already rigged it, and if that fails he will declare martial law.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 30 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ballot or bullet.

And this pig wants to take away the ballot.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Seriously! Like we’re here being all ‘ooohhhh what if he doesn’t accept the results???’

We depose him, of course.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Why wait? He's already telegraphed his intentions since he got in office. Why let him consolidate his power all the way til the elections happen (or don't)? There is more than enough shit he's done to justify removing him from office.

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 21 hours ago

Good question. I guess we need time to build enough of a movement to make it a reality. One person attempting is umm not going to work out. Probably. Idk.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why even ask, everyone already knows what he'd do

[–] nukeforyou@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's going to shit his pants?

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ooh, I meant another attempted coup where he calls the people he funded "antifa terrorists" but that's more accurate since it will happen multiple times before January

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

“We can’t swear them in, they’re under active investigation”

[–] the_wise_wolf@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Why not both?

[–] the_wise_wolf@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Exactly. Same questions as last time. Same responses as last time. Don't expect any different actions than last time.

[–] NotAnAmerican@piefed.ca 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

At what point do these traitors go to jail?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

After a complete overhaul of the Untied States

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago

Honestly? We need to get his sympathetic traitors out of the supreme court or change the balance by adding more, which he won't do. No other change will see him in jail.

[–] notabot@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We just had a great election. I believe there was cheating.

It's hard to know if it's just dementia or if he's just saying the quiet bit out loud because he knows he wont face consequences.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

He knows there was cheating because he did it.

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Trumps acceptance or not is irrelevant to the legal process and he is simply attempting to sow more fear and hysteria

And everyone eats it the fuck up

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah, it's not like he's tried to overturn an election before, or is ignoring the constitution...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Agreed. His opinion isn't news, and it never has been.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Doesn’t matter if he accepts it. It’s not up to him.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Trump does something very typically Trump. Constitution gets shit on for 3,845,520th time since 2017. People still angry, possibly angrier. However, congress does nothing and nothing really happens as a consequence.

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

This headline happens so often that it's boring. (Which is part of the problem I know) We all know he's going to claim the election results are rigged, we all know he's going to say he won no matter what, we all know this and that and all the rest. We've seen it all before

load more comments
view more: next ›