this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
475 points (98.4% liked)

politics

27630 readers
3247 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Since not even his wife seems to care, can they just stop reporting? Some podcaster got shot a while ago, a lot of people get shot all the time.

Kids get shot, ICE shoots people who the fuck cares about this guy?

Why was this ever big news?

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

They immediately used his death to try to argue that trans people are all domestic terrorists, and organized witch hunts to get people fired for making comments (often targeting professors that were on TPUSA’s hit list). There is a good chance that the Trump regime will cite the shooting as evidence that trans people should be viewed as terrorists.

I think it also really exemplifies the “reality show” - iffication of right wing American politics. The president is a reality TV star, Dr Oz is administering Medicare, Hegseth was a news personality; Erika Kirk is just an opportunistic vulture like the rest. The kind of person who spends their life trying to get on Big Brother or Survivor so that they can make a career out of partying and socializing.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We are somehow surprised a shitty person had a shitty wife? There are plenty of dynamic asshole duos.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I'll never be rich or famous, and I'm a member of a group these folks actively stoke hate towards. But I'll say this, when I die, I know my wife will actually be sad about not having me anymore. That's something a lot of these folks can't honestly say

[–] JanusHassildorf@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She is so weird. First time I saw and heard her I was like: There is something wrong with this woman.

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Well she did marry Charlie Kirk...

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Should surprise no one since she obviously didn't marry him for his looks or personality.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some women like tiny faces. Don't kink-shame.

[–] Jagarico@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

You mean don't kirk-shame?

Come on, did anyone think that this marriage was based on love? Please.

[–] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 120 points 2 days ago (23 children)

Ok, so psychopaths marry psychopaths. In other news: rain still wet.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I heard of anecdote of a guy who worked as waiter for the rich in a luxury yacht. He said pretty much what rich people ever talk about is building more wealth. These people are psychopaths. They see life as material transactions.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

not all, but most rich people are constantly obsessed with positioning themselves versus their peers in business and family. its how the untalented keep score.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 61 points 1 day ago

MAGAs don't do martyrs well because they're all psychopaths, and can't maintain the pretense of caring enough to keep someone's legacy alive.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wait till you see how fast Melania moves on and profits from Donny’s death. She might set a land speed record.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Melania tacitly admitted during her husband's first term that she is a trophy wife and married Donald for money. When asked if she married Donald for the money, she responded "he wouldn't marry me if I'm not beautiful".

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

(Disclaimer: she's only talking about physical beauty. She's as ugly as the devils haemorrhoids on the inside)

[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I also have to add that she doesn't really look attractive too - the Mar-a-Lago face is a super ugly trend

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Eh, I think she's fine on that front, whatever procedures she has had are a bit lighter.

She doesn't have the over the top saw-face like others in the circle that have basically mutilated themselves with ill-advised procedures.

[–] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Once he is dead, all of those creditors he doged will be fighting each other to pick the corpse clean. She will probably be shredded in the feeding frenzy.

[–] Aljernon@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago

Most of the money he's borrowed over the last couple decades links back to Russian Oligarchs so they will likely right it off as a business expense.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itistime@infosec.pub 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not surprising. I recall when she “forgave” and every media outlet and commentator was like “this is wonderful, healing and what we all need to do!”

Why are so many folks so dumb in recognizing charlatans? We need education just for this. Know when you’re being played!

I'm becoming increasingly of the opinion that some groups of people care more about the packaging than the message.

As long as a person says the right kinds of things, is of the right pedigree, or has the right support and/or accolades, they can get away with damn near anything.

[–] lemmylump@lemmy.world 94 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What a pain in the neck she must be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Correction, for her it was the event of a century. For me it was a Sunday on my 22nd wedding anniversary, and spent all morning having fun in bed with my wife because I am not dead

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Obviously it's only hosted on Twitter: https://x.com/HotSpotHotSpot/status/2016323405125963895

It's not as bad and the title makes it sound. She talks about the memorial service and having millions of people hear the gospel and stories about Kirk. She's not giggling about the assassination. She's a grifter, obviously, but this audio is not the bombshell Owens says it is.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 70 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This news is being posted as if everyone thought she was attracted to his personality

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I genuinely think she was. To psychopaths, everyone is transactionally of limited use. I think in him she genuinely saw and identified someone like herself. And if something had happened to her. Charlie would have 100% done the same as her. They aren't well.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)

She's happier now, I'm sure, because he's more useful to her dead than he was alive. There's a transaction for ya.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago

To be fair, if I was that asshole's spouse and learned he'd just been shot, I'd have been pretty happy myself.

[–] willie1foot@theblower.au 43 points 2 days ago (3 children)

@andros_rex Still waiting to hear why she dropped the 'tradwife'
schtick. I mean, who's looking after the children?

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago

That is just the classic Phyllis Schafly playbook - making a career out of telling women they shouldn’t have careers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My husband's dead. Like, I'm not trying to be morbid, but he's dead.

She should put that on a t-shirt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Eleven. days. later - I’m, like, more traumatized from seeing that snuff video then his own wife was.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 29 points 2 days ago (3 children)

As much as they are both (all 3 actually) are horrible people, there's nothing nefarious in her not grieving how people want her to.

Perhaps she doesn't care. Perhaps she does, but sees an opportunity and can suck it up. Perhaps she does and she is using work to distract herself. Perhaps she does and it comes out differently. Perhaps she does and shes good at acting like nothing is wrong.

It's all just a distraction story.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In some ways I completely agree.

Its absolutely possible for someone who loves their husband to appear happy after they suddenly pass away.

However, the pivot to capture the TP USA business is a conscious one, and it definitely feels pretty gross to anyone who understands that it is indeed a business.

The thing is, to people receptive to their message, its not a "business", its a cause or a movement. They can just say "Charlie would have wanted her to continue his work!"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I'm not sure I'm allowed to say this, but her face looks like a bleached asshole.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›