this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
223 points (94.8% liked)

Ask Lemmy

38056 readers
1337 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I woke up today, to a public comment in a Lemmy community asking a series of tagged accounts why they had downvoted certain posts

I thought that reactions to posts and comments are anonymous and now I don't really know what to feel about Lemmy any more.

In this case I had downvoted a poster because of its design, but was confronted publicly for being racist because the person assumed that I downvoted the message on the poster

EDIT: changed the title from "How" to "Why" because it broke rule nr 5 about it being a support question

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Andy_R@feddit.uk 119 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (7 children)

The Fediverse is open, everything you do on here is fully public.

It's why I prefer it over reddit, where who knows what really happens with all the vote manipulation and brigading.

To answer your question, it is all listed alongside upvotes on the posts if using mbin.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 21 points 4 weeks ago (14 children)

Depends on the instance, mine is an mbin instance but the upvotes and downvotes are hidden.

I remember coming across a site where you could put in a Fediverse URL and it would tell you who had upvoted and downvoted it, presumably it had an instance in the background that was tracking all that.

Edit: lemvotes.org, linked below by another comment.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes, the information is sent to your instance, and then is being censored by your instance. It's personal choice for the instance and it's support. But your instance must either be commonly supporting you not seeing it, or dictating you aren't seeing it.

Kind of like the championship football game played in the U.S. today before the Superbowl, where Fox edited out access to seeing people paying tribute to the man murdered by ice.

Sometimes it's good to have information, sometimes people think it is not

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 76 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

I just block anyone who confronts me about why I voted a certain way. "Because I felt like it, fuck off cunt" is my go-to justification.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 75 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 25 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

Thanks! That's is very helpful and also concerning

Not sure how I feel about this

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 51 points 4 weeks ago (9 children)

Why is that concerning? The whole system was meant to be transparent

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 49 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (16 children)

Not the OP, but i find it concerning because this enables creating a very detailed profile of a users interests, political alignment, medical issues, sexual orientation etc. Even if they never post anything! We should all know by now that there are bad actors actively using this kind of data in the worst ways imaginable. In the US this can already have life threatening consequences (ICE raids etc...)

This is not a good privacy oriented design and it exposes users in a dangerous way.

EDIT: About lemvotes.org. I like this site because it makes it obvious how dangerous this really is. For example I accidentally upvoted a really disgusting NSFW post misclicking on my phone. This will forever be visible to the world. I'm a documented pervert now. Good job.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

i find it concerning because this enables creating a very detailed profile of a users interests, political alignment, medical issues, sexual orientation etc. Even if they never post anything!

So don't interact. What you read isn't stored, but if you interact, it should be public.

For example I accidentally upvoted a really disgusting NSFW post misclicking on my phone.

I agree that it's dumb you don't have a "my votes" page where you can remove that. But you can go to said post and just remove your vote.

[–] Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

So in a niche community we are now promoting that people don't interact with said community if they care about their privacy at all?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not at all. I'm saying you should interact and stand behind your interactions.

For example, you downvoted my post, which is fine. You also replied, which is also fine. Why is it bad that one isn't on your profile (but it is public) and the other is openly visible in a list on your profile?

Interactions are by default public, otherwise there's no point to interacting. I'd go one further and say that having the voting information public but not visible by default is by far the worst option.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 weeks ago

I constantly misvote by doing a gesture not exactly right on my phone. I wouldn't judge anyone by their votes.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 23 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

To be fair OP isn't the only one that finds it concerning. Kbin/Mbin had tons of complaints about its public voting until the Mbin devs decided to cave and hide downvotes. Piefed also tried to implement private voting before, but gave up because of their halfhearted approach not working out.

I personally like public votes. It's great to see who upvoted me, especially if it's someone I recognize. While I miss being able to see downvotes, because sometimes I do feel like asking for feedback from downvoters on where I could do better.

That said, there's an issue of consent there imo. So I do understand the complaints. While a receiving instance is technically free to do with the federated vote what they want, the user never really consented to that. It's like if an instance made private messages public. Theoretically it's allowed to, but that doesn't mean people would be happy about it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 51 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

The protocol is ActivityPub not ActivityPriv

[–] Asudox@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

I'm pretty sure the Pub doesn't stand for Public, but rather Publish.

edit: not saying that it is private, just my opinion on whether the pub is an adjective or a verb

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago

Still Publish, not Privish.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

You are right but you can’t exactly publish something and expect it to be private

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 42 points 4 weeks ago

If someone is posting about you downvoting them, then they're a seriously flawed individual. Some people will take any reason they can to call other people racist. I think it's a fetish, honestly.

You're fine.

[–] K3can@lemmy.radio 35 points 4 weeks ago (12 children)

Isn't the Fediverse supposed to be open?

You can show your personal support for something by upvoting it or your opposition to something by downvoting it, but if you don't want to take a stance on something at all, you don't have to.

It's an entirely optional mechanic. You can fully utilize Lemmy to view, post, and comment without ever voting if you don't want to.

As far as I'm aware, the votes don't really matter, anyway. Lemmy doesn't seem to use karma the way that Reddit does. i.e. I've never seen a post removed because the user didn't have enough karma, etc.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 35 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Much easier to determine vote manipulation when there is no central authority to handle it and the votes, as well as moderation actions, are publicly visible.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Votes being public is kinda cool, same for mod actions and who made them.  Cool way to counter the Resdit type shadow, secret decisions and botted and bought votes.

Reddit even allows you to hide all your action history (no comment history), which is done to make it easier for bots and bought accounts to operate.

As for someone calling you or anyone out for voting certain way, who cares, tell them to go pound sand

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 25 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I was sceptic of the open concept at first. But now I find it appealing, because comment and post history are also public. If people wanted, they could probably extract my living place, job, sexual preferences and political opinions from my comment history of 1,000 comments. So why hide the up- and down votes?

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This is the point though. Its it's hidden by the platform, I feel like exposing it in public is against the sentiment

If voting was public through Lemmy and its clients, it would be more open and not only partly anonymous

I had assumed that if voting activity was meant to be public, there would have been a feed like the mod logs, for each users activity

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 20 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

That's true, but I think this is more of a development thing than an actual aim of Lemmy. Due to the nature of federation, everything must be open. As the Software is strongly inspired by Reddit, transparent votes is something that is technically exposed via the API but not yet implemented in the UI. But I think any app developer could integrate this into their app if they liked. It seems like Mbin chose a different path way.

In general, there is no congruent sentiment in Lemmy development, but I agree there should be one or it should be discussed with the community. Have you looked if there is an already ongoing discussion on git?

I care more about PieFed, but I don't know how they look on the topic though.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

I just think it should be more obviously transparent, rather than the UI pretending it has no attribution.

I recall some proposal about adding the info to the UI and objections due to privacy concerns, which is just pretending something is private.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 24 points 3 weeks ago

Who cares? Upvote what you like, downvote what you don't. Who cares if someone has a whinge.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I woke up today, to a public comment in a Lemmy community asking a series of tagged accounts why they had downvoted certain posts

Which community/instance did this? I'd like to block it.

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago (12 children)
[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@feddit.org 20 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] subignition@fedia.io 14 points 4 weeks ago

not surprising that it's Deceptichum

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (6 children)

I mostly solve this by upvoting what I like and ignoring the downvote option, reserving it for advertisement bots and spam.
I think that having the voting record hidden in the client UI makes more harm than good to be honest and would've preferred if the devs changed their mind on tricking end users that voting is anonymous.

The federated design of fediverse means that upvotes and downvotes must sync between instances and as such they're not hidden or anonymous in any real sense. Anyone with a fediverse instance can see the votes.

lemvotes.org democratise this by allowing everyone, not just techies with their own instance, to see the votes.

One should know that lemvotes.org isn't a perfect source of truth though, when I lefthand scroll I sometimes fat finger a downvote that I remove again. The latest downvote in my record is one of those.

https://lemvotes.org/ state I downvoted a post:

https://feddit.uk/ sees 75 upvotes:

https://sopuli.xyz/ sees 75 upvotes and I clearly have not voted:

[–] Perspectivist@feddit.uk 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

How dare you not upvote my post.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago

It needs to be open for federation to work. It needs to share what votes are by whom from where. If instances don't have this information they can't really moderate. They can't block people or other instances.

Users typically don't have access to this information, but any admin does. Because of how federation works though, anyone can become an admin pretty easily. Also, you can go somewhere that publishes the data for you who's done that work already.

I don't see this as an issue personally. It's just something to be aware of. I wish it was told to new users so they aren't surprised, but now that you know you can be prepared. Always assume others can see your votes.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 15 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

It's pretty helpful sometimes when you can see who is brigading and where the majority of downvotes come from. Allows communities to better police themselves.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

It's to guard against bot accounts. I'd much rather have that instead of the clearly manipulated comment sections on Reddit. The pro-israel posting and down voting went away almost overnight when we got broader access and a few mods got called out about it. Go look at a comment section about it that hits all on Reddit, there's clearly artificial voting going on.

It's still not that hard to mess around but I'll take what I can get, and I guess it does keep the racists away, even if it's sometimes a false positive like in your case.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Pamasich@kbin.earth 13 points 4 weeks ago

To allow other instances to know about your vote, Lemmy federates it. This involves the post you downvoted and your account. Neither is really optional here, as the receiving instance needs your account to verify the vote.

When another instance receives your vote, it's up to them how they handle it. Mbin used to display both of them to users, but due to backlash from Lemmy users they made downvotes private eventually. Upvotes are still visible on Mbin though. Other fediverse platforms might also display your votes to users like Mbin and Lemvotes do. And of course anyone can make a minimal ActivityPub implementation and subscribe to a Lemmy community and get all the votes made within.

[–] sickday@fedia.io 10 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

As other comments have said its by design. But there is a quirk if they used lemvotes to determine who the down voters were: it doesn't seem to pick up downvotes by mbin users. For example, according to lemvotes I’ve never downvoted anything. This is demonstrably false :)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›