Here's mine:

- Note 1: This tierlist only includes distros I've tried.
- Note 2: Slackware would rank higher now; I made this about month ago.
- Note 3: The "noob" tier doesn't mean the distro is bad. If it weren't there, Mint would rank higher.
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
Here's mine:

Damn, you've tried a lot of different distros. I've been using Linux for 15 years but only been on like 8 different ones. Installed personally about 5.
Gentoo in the top tier, checks out
The only list I get behind. It is missing NixOS for S tier, but otherwise very logical.
I want to like NixOS. I love the idea of declarative system configuration, but I always found NixOS quite easy to break. It also didn't seem to like Eduroam much.
Why try so many distros? It's not like most of them are gonna be substantially different.
You never know, the grass might be greener elsewhere. I will say though, to me that only applies to independent distros. At this point i only bother trying distros that are actually different at their core. Arch- or debian-based distros are all kind of the same to me.

I was getting really mad, the I realized what you did there.
~~In all honesty i don't get it the E for endravourOS on my old ass laptop everything works just fine, even the nvidia card~~

How dare you rank Debian at....oh. I see what you did there. Nice.
Wait, where's Gentoo?
the dark and forbidden G tier
no hannah montana linux??
That's at least two tiers above S, obviously
So high it wouldnβt fit on your screen
βHighβ in every sense
I enjoy linux mint a lot
I've been recommending it as the beginner's distro for years. Default DE is very windows familiar, install is easy, out of box experience is great, built on Debian so it's stable as fuck. There's nothing really wrong with it unless you need newer drivers or something
Only Linux Mint Debian Edition is built on Debian. Linux Mint (main) is built on Ubuntu.
Ubuntu is a Debian distro too. Either way mint is a Debian distro.
There's the Linux Mint main distro build off Ubuntu and a separate Linux Mint Debian distro build directly from Deb.
Specificity is useful, especially in the context that you said "Mint is built on Debian so it's stable as fuck" - well actually, not directly. It's built on Ubuntu, which a lot of people complain has a more bloat and thus less stability than Debian.
Personally I've not had issues with any of the three, they're all good, but there are differences. Mint includes a number of packages that Debian does not (PPAs, Snap, Wayland infegration), because it's inherited them all from Ubuntu. Mint is 64-bit whereas Debian supports 32/64 and other architectures, because again.. Mint (standard) is based on Ubuntu, which is 64-bit only.
I use fedora workstation but itβs so boring because it just does what I need and I never have any problems π₯²
I might give Debian a spin at some point
Debian + nix home-manager is hard to beat. Confining my bleeding edge software to be rootlesson top of a bulletproof distro is very much the same -- boring (in the best way). Plus the latest apt in debian 13 just feels nicer than dnf to me somehow.
Here is mine:
Mint
Haven't really tried anything else or it was 10+ years ago.
Haha! You beat me to it! Great ranking. I 100% agree with where you've places each/it.
artix mentioned!!!
as an artix/gentoo user, where would you place gentoo?
I "tried" installing gentoo once but i didn't know what a tarball was at the time so i can't really rate it. the documentation did help me a lot with OpenRC on artix though.
i did hear nixOS is also source-based in a way, but i'm not sure on the details.
Yes, NixOS and GNU Guix are both technically source-based, but they pull from a binary cache server by default to prevent it from building everything. You could disable it, but i don't really see the point since as far as i'm aware, nix and guix don't have the use flags stuff like Gentoo has.
I switched from Arch to Fedora recently and so far I like it. Faster than any distro I've ever run on this laptop.
Why did you try so many different distros? For me it was RedHat first, then I switched to Debian(because "no corporations" sentiment, technically RH was ok) somewhere 20 years ago and use it since then.
I thought this was pretty normal for Linux nerds. Iβve tried loads but I keep coming back to openSUSE.
It's absolutely normal and should resolve itself eventually.
Why do hikers travel to different mountains to conquer?
Because hiking is the goal for hikers, changing scenery is just to make things less tedious.
What's the reason for changing distros? (Except of course for the distros that offer completely different approach like switching Debian-Gentoo-LFS might be of some interest)
I think for some its fun, and they get to see different ways things can be set up
I was curious
Everyone has different needs and preferences. Finding something early on and being able to stick with it is great, but many don't find that right away, or things change with their needs or the distro.
Plus it depends also on how long you stick around each time. I know I dipped in and out of dual booting for a long time, only now in the past year settling in well. And each time I tried Linux again, lots had changed so I couldn't just go back to what I used before.
Isn't part of being in the Linux culture to experiment with things, even if it's just the window manager, settings, or particular apps?
I wish I was competent enough to install and maintain void π₯²
Maybe someday
Void and NixOS in S tier is based, my two favorite distros. Because of me using void though i kinda miss using Runit when i want to use a declaritive system like nix. I'm working on a gnu guix config in a vm now to see if i can use that as an alternative instead. It's not runit per se, but who knows, maybe i'll still like shepherd better than systemd.
I tried Mint and Bazzite on my laptop, installed Bazzite on my Desktop, wasn't happy with the atomic style (wanted to install a lot of stuff and switch to the low-latency-kernel for music production),
switched to OpenSuse Tumbleweed and stayed there. I got a second Desktop PC for cheap from a friend, took out the GPU, installed Debian on it and run Game Servers (Minecraft, Satisfactory, TF2) on it now.
Very happy with both Tumbleweed (as a daily driver) and Debian (for my server).
Void, Debian and Artix being in S tier is just based.
Nobara is the way!
What about LMDE?
Every try puppy linux? Its a fun and unique one.
Why is debian S tier, and Arch A tier? They both use systemd. For me I would switch Artix and Arch tbh. I had lots of issues with the artix repo because of hidden systemd dependencies. Void, probably was the smoothest experience I ever had. Shout out to Luke Smith back in the days who had great rice for void.