this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
4 points (75.0% liked)

Perchance - Create a Random Text Generator

1715 readers
9 users here now

⚄︎ Perchance

This is a Lemmy Community for perchance.org, a platform for sharing and creating random text generators.

Feel free to ask for help, share your generators, and start friendly discussions at your leisure :)

This community is mainly for discussions between those who are building generators. For discussions about using generators, especially the popular AI ones, the community-led Casual Perchance forum is likely a more appropriate venue.

See this post for the Complete Guide to Posting Here on the Community!

Rules

1. Please follow the Lemmy.World instance rules.

2. Be kind and friendly.

  • Please be kind to others on this community (and also in general), and remember that for many people Perchance is their first experience with coding. We have members for whom English is not their first language, so please be take that into account too :)

3. Be thankful to those who try to help you.

  • If you ask a question and someone has made a effort to help you out, please remember to be thankful! Even if they don't manage to help you solve your problem - remember that they're spending time out of their day to try to help a stranger :)

4. Only post about stuff related to perchance.

  • Please only post about perchance related stuff like generators on it, bugs, and the site.

5. Refrain from requesting Prompts for the AI Tools.

  • We would like to ask to refrain from posting here needing help specifically with prompting/achieving certain results with the AI plugins (text-to-image-plugin and ai-text-plugin) e.g. "What is the good prompt for X?", "How to achieve X with Y generator?"
  • See Perchance AI FAQ for FAQ about the AI tools.
  • You can ask for help with prompting at the 'sister' community Casual Perchance, which is for more casual discussions.
  • We will still be helping/answering questions about the plugins as long as it is related to building generators with them.

6. Search through the Community Before Posting.

  • Please Search through the Community Posts here (and on Reddit) before posting to see if what you will post has similar post/already been posted.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I find the update to image generator sadly quite horrendous. The quality in aesthetics in all kind of different styles has dropped imensly. Faces often look totally weird. Their is no comparisson between the former and the new one in quality. Before it had this certain magical style that made it stand out. The aesthetics were brilliant. In some sense it was almost like an underground midjourney alternative. This is now gone. Maybe the new one can do text a little better. But you can use any other engine for that. The unique perchance style you don't get anywhere else. Please change it back! Or maybe offer both. But from an artistic point of view this is a catastrophy right now.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agracier@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't understand why the change in results. used to be it was possible to create wonderful painting styles, realistic, Beaux-Arts, academic, vintage pulp, Art Deco or realistic looking old photos etc and now the results are so childishly cartoonish as to be useless. The same as on any other run-of-the-mill AI generator.

I simply do not understand why the wonderful quality that set Perchance apart is seemingly abandoned. The update that was implemented begin August 2025 was superb. Why degrade now?

Is this a temporary thing or a long-lasting change? Leave well enough alone.

[–] wpgartist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm a simple user with very simple prompts (no more than a couple dozen words), I had a great professional photo prompt I used alot but now all the professional (and casual) photos are coming out as cartoons. I'm nowhere near the rest of these people's level of creating, so I don't know what this "limit" is, but I just know I'd like to be able to create realistic images again please.

edit: As an update, now over half my generated images are appearing as if my monitor has been smashed, it does that wierd digital abstract.

[–] agracier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If it is any consolation, you are describing exactly what i am experiencing: loss of realistic quality with practically all results being rendered as cartoons and with mangled and mixed up limbs far far more often than prior to this latest update ... So sad to see a wonderful version downgraded for no reason that I can understand.

[–] MotionMuse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have to say, the only benefit ive experienced from this update was now text renders better. But every other aspect is worse.

The worst seems to be the simple lack of clarifying news about the update. People on reddit are confused and wondering what is going on.

Just let us know if this is permanent and what the changes were so we can adjust, or let us know if we can relax and things will be fixed at some point.

The drastically reduced token count is ruining generators that use style mixing. We used to be make to make amazing unique images, now things seem to default to cartoons.

the style tags on many generators used to be able to mitigate the tendency for the images to skew toward cartoons, but they no longer seem to work.

Weights are totally broken, no more boosting terms to even things out or control the prompt better.

we can still make photo-real images but we can make complex scenes as we have to dedicate so much of the prompt to the quality/camera terms to make the image not be a cartoon. If weights worked we could try to boost a smaller amount of tokens and have more room for the actual prompt we want to achieve. The token count is so small it fights us every step.

So please, just give us some news about what your intentions are!

PLEASE!

[–] anonfox421@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Perchance posted in this thread https://lemmy.world/post/42343571/21834076 that the issue with the cap on the length of prompts is unintentional and expected to be resolved soon along with (hopefully) the prompt weights.

They also mentioned that in that thread the issue with negative prompts being ignored probably won't be fixed as quickly (but they are still working on it) and the “CFG burn” issues and related tendency to push stuff towards cartoon or anime won’t be solved immediately but are also being worked on.

[–] agracier@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Tnx for the news. This is more than I have gleaned so far. Still sort of begs the question: why not revert to the previous version?

[–] amustard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

+1 I'm getting the results I was getting a year ago with similar prompts. It's not just the issue of photorealistic quality or getting the prompts to work right, I also get quality artefacts I have not been seeing for over 6 months. It seems the previous model was custom-trained, and that this change lost all the ability and quality that have been acquired. Personally, I have seen zero improvement in any area over the last one. And it's not a matter of prompt length.

[–] Martin89@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

i used Anime Screencap style but they now less detailed and background almost not exist.

[–] kokopelliaz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This may explain some of my issues. I was creating images for a gritty 1800s sailing piece, and when I moved to the sequel, suddenly there seemed to be a stifling amount of censorship. In addition, "anti-description" is completely ignored. "Gritty" is completely missing in some cases. Cartoonish. Yeah, that tracks.

For instance, when I say that the pirate sailors are bathing in the altogether, and one of them is a teenager, it's the 1800s, and that's what happens. NOT the sailors are sitting around the deck, fully clothed and with Navy hats.

[–] Vayrinen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It seems that the generator is being updated, It is not final yet, and even if it was, we got all that discussion on the previous update that happened last year, people got used to the new images and that was it

I'm also having issues with previous prompts becoming cartoonish/anime out of nowhere, I couldn't find a way to fix that yet, but I dont think there is much we can do except wait.

I wouldn't expect a free tool to have 2 models at the same time

https://lemmy.world/post/41971465

[–] Almaumbria@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There's currently what I presume is a temporary issue where elements beyond the 250-300th word will be ignored, I'm not 100% certain on what the exact cutoff point is, it seems to vary.

So: I just stripped my prompts a little, mostly removing the redundant and overly verbose descriptions that used to be necessary -- that fixed it right away.

I'm getting downright amazing results with these smaller inputs now, for both realistic and stylized images. The trick really is that you have to put the most important details first, and the least important last. That way you guarantee that the "essence" of the image you want doesn get lost if you inadvertently cross the 250-300 word boundary.

Also, some people are saying that removing negative prompts seemed to help. I can't confirm that because I wasn't using them.

Now, and I'ma go a bit offtopic here, I don't know if this situation is only temporary or what, but it took such a miniscule effort on my part to adapt to the change that, with all due respect, I'm left once again wondering what in Dagon's unholy piehole is wrong with folks rushing to the torch and pitchfork.

Well, business as usual: another update, another riot ;)

[–] tom555@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I mostlly use way shorter prompts anyway and the results Im getting are sadly depressing in comparisson to what it was before. Its not about the prompts. I tried very different styles. The engine is just way lower quality now. And I think if something like that happens feedback is whats necesary and wanted. Nothing to do with pitchforks.

[–] Almaumbria@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Friendly reminder that politely reporting an issue is not the same as "this is horrendous, shocking, depressing, a catastrophe" et cetera. There's a fine line between giving feedback and plain old venting :)

Come on. Dev reads what we write here. And the exact same reaction and request has been seen and made before, right after an update -- if it was feasible to "offer both" I think we wouldn't be having this discussion in the first place. So where does that leave us, exactly?

Its not about the prompts.

Well, I was able to very closely reproduce the aesthetics I wanted for thirty-one custom styles, so if you forgive me, I will take your assertion with a pinch of salt. I've run into minor issues here and there too, but the situation is pretty far from unworkable. And despite these problems, I'm still getting higher quality than before, and more consistently to boot.

So I dunno. But I can provide you some examples of things that currently work really well, if you like.

[–] anonfox421@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

The biggest issue that I've found with the shorter prompts is where you're trying to describe a number of specific things (for example, if you're trying to describe two or three specific characters, define hair colors with highlights, eye colors, skin colors, body shape/type, where the characters are in relation to each other, what they're doing, where they are in terms of a scene, what the atmosphere/time of day is, some objects in the scene, lighting, and so on in addition to the art style of the image) then you quickly run out of words before you hit the limit where things get hit and dropped off.

lot you aren't recognizing that's the least of the issues, likely a result of other issues. either related too temporary lowered resources, offline multi modality, that or the mian dev finally decided too flip back on Sryle Core Critiquing of the GAi modeling core.

[–] Vayrinen@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I agree, we don't need huge prompts anymore, I'm still trying to fix the cartoonish style, but I'm sure I'm the problem, since my prompts suuuuck, I have about 380-400 words, it doesn't seem to ignore anything... but 100%, another update another riot

For a free service, remember that

[–] agracier@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I don't think you are the problem with the cartoonish style results. I get the same cartoonish results with prompts that used to render into almost academically realistic imagery. It is heartbreaking to see the cartoonish results now.

We never did, I mean some yall had the craziest natural language style blocks going on LOL... literally the Size of my largest Formula blocks some of them.., outside fine-tuning using Formula blocks the actual style blending it does is literally a few short phrases or https: calls, typically around 3 short blends.

[–] ccufcc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Despite the negative feedback I still think this is an epic boost, not a downgrade

[–] Alllo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

tho im avoiding characters atm, my settings are turning out extracreative :)

[–] GooPunch@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Didn't it get posted that the devs are putting more resources towards the Story telling AI and it's making the image generator worse r something? I'm having the same issues with more complex and detailed prompts. Like if I want to make an image that looks like a poster with folds and wrinkles and wear etc, it just wont do it now. but for more simple prompts, like getting an image that just looks like a clean photo. So it's fine for now. Like, I can get the character design, their clothing, and the setting in. But extra stuff, not so much.

[–] yotv@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea its a big downgrade simple images are fine but i can't see any improvements there is nothing this version can do that the old one can't just more limitations. some people mention text on the images is better but this is pointless because 1 i know how to do add that stuff the old school way. and 2 with the hard token Limit if you do that it will probably fuck up the art i am hopeful this will be fixed

Fine-tuning Rip, Intuitive technical future tools Rip, more then an if that even 2+ styles blending??? Rip

....

[–] MinoriMirariRProductions@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It broke a ton of technical and formula related prompting systems as well. Also, fundamentally breaks a lot of novel forms of style blending. On my end it destroyed RltDif as it was being booted up into research, showing massive potential for Reality Environment building. The only other known means of building true Environments is formula prompting. RltDif basically once finished would have offered a Reality Environment fine-tuning dashboard prompt, the new update if this is truly how it is going to be from now on & not just some temporary maintenance awaiting resource allocations adjustments, or rather if it was done becauae of what rudbo said "for better text generation" you are nuts, you can literally select the text with {...} Which keeps it from being affected by noisy generation.... Anways this sets back RltDif and a load of other features that where being worked on. Along with Formula blocks are now functioning kinda wonky, but im sure those will be the first of things I can fix / make what ever changes within formatting for conversions, I don't know how much of everything will still be functional. This update as far as I can tell actually removes a lot more then it adds, that's if it even adds anything at all to begin with LOL. I was about to "add that and 10 to 20 x whatever this terrible over pervasive Style is, & likely a way to have this style and siht "Any style feasible?".. I also had the text generation issue plenty fixed more then fixed I had a whole library of siht for text and creative font generation with out much of an error in text generation.. If this is all for text or something, then why not just limit it and all styles like it to the critique "screencap" or something,.. cause this is overkill ridiculous, not only do some of us not care for perfect paragraphs vs short phrases of text generation quality, but some of us fixed that issue regardless with out crippling the Modeling Core, or toasting multi modality into a static loaf of crap.