this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
492 points (97.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

36823 readers
3162 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ladoga@sopuli.xyz 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Old testament is quite rough. Lots of killing and raping going on.

God tells the chosen people to kill this and this tribe. Take virgins as wives, kill all males. I never understood killing of livestock though.

It's pretty much how violent and dog eat dog world the Middle East was 2500 years ago.

The scariest thing is that even today billions of people believe in this ancient Abrahamic BS. (Christians, Jews and Muslims)

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It's better if you read it as "some guy told the nation that God told them to beat each other to death over petty shit and not only did they agree to it, they extolled it as righteous and holy"

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

When I was in college. I took a class about the Bible as literature. It was super good. Really interesting. I'm not even necessarily like religious, but it's cool to look at it from that sort of a literary perspective especially because it's such a foundational work in Western Civilization

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (3 children)

It's really not.

There are large chunks of it that are really repetitive and boring, just things like the number of goats and chickens owned by so and so.

And like a lot of ancient mythology it can be really hard to relate to, given the vastly different cultural context that produced the text. That can be kinda entertaining in it's own way, but mostly it just means that you're not really going to understand the character motivations or themes of a story. Also sometimes the protagonist will do something horrifically immoral by today's standards without the text treating it as notable at all.

IMO all of the actually interesting parts (like Genesis) are all really short and you probably know them already from cultural osmosis.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

It is also important to note that the bible was curated (and probably even edited) by the Catholic Church in the past. So what you read is only what they want(ed) you to read to begin with. I would really like to get into the apocrypha at some point - especially into alternative descriptions to the biblical canon

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I don't think it's accurate to only indicate the Roman catholic church. The creation of the bible was a process of curation and editing intentional and accidental.

But the Roman catholic church is defo responsible for the inclusion of the Johannine Comma in the KJV. (Because they fraudulently inserted it into a copy of a Greek manuscript they produced to claim that clause's authenticity)

[–] volvoxvsmarla@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are large chunks of it that are really repetitive and boring, just things like the number of goats and chickens owned by so and so.

That honestly sounds like the exposition of every character in a Wes Anderson movie

[–] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

except that Anderson films use comedy and cinematography to maintain viewers' interest in expository scenes that might otherwise feel mundane

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Now I'm a little curious what a Wes Anderson Bible movie would be like. Owen Wilson can be Jesus

[–] Hazmatastic@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Bill Murray as God trying to tell Norton-Adam about sin, while Dafoe-Satan in snake form tries to convince Swinton-Eve to eat the apple. Jason Schwartzman voices the apple. Adrien Brody and Jeff Goldlbum get to be 2 of the 3 wise men, the third is just Bill Murray in another costume. Even the blood is pastel. Only 20% of the film is not stop-motion miniatures.

[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

Bill Murray is God who is so fucking over it and just wants to hand this shit off to his son.

Jason Schwartzman is Satan trying so hard to get everybody to like him even though he sucks.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Revelations with shrooms. Better or worse?

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

I read part of the bible cracked out of my mind before. Everyone who saw me reading was so happy for me at first. Then they figured out I wasn’t reading it right and they would be mad when I pointed out the literal meaning hidden in all the subtext

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 11 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I read the Bible last year and tried to imagine how it would be perceived if it were any work of fiction. Looking at it just as a fictional book, it's very poorly written. For one thing, explanations of Jesus sacrifice only come after the fact. A good book would have set it up and explained the necessity of the sacrifice beforehand. Another problem is parts of it are very boring, like the parts that describe the temple in detail. However, I recommend Genesis and Samuel because they are very eventful, a lot happens in them

[–] IlmariGanander@lemmy.wtf 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I was kind of musing in a corner of my mind that Jesus acting as a sacrifice to god...really only makes sense in a cultural context where basically everyone around you is already sacrificing goats and chickens and bulls and whatever to their gods.

When that cultural context is removed (as in our culture where generally nobody slaughters animals as a sacrifice to any god) the whole crucifixion thing comes off as...weirdly pagan.

Like, HAVING to have a human/god sacrificed to god to...remove sin I guess...it only really makes sense if you have the cultural expectation that sacrificing things to some god is...just what you DO to get rid of sin or stuff that's harmful like curses or whatever?

I'm not a bible scholar, and I know there's tons of theology that's already argued about Jesus "dying for our sins" into infinity.

I'm more vaguely looking at this from a layperson secular standpoint, where I'm thinking about the cultural context of "sacrifice" as it pertains to 2000 years ago, and how it pertains to now in our current culture. Like...wow, the culture and how we see things has totally shifted and the Jesus died thing is a really weird boondogle/relic of those ancient mindsets, isn't it?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago

Yeah, a lot of things in the Bible probably made more sense for the culture it was written for. Of course the books of the Bible were written over hundreds of years and so culture shifted in that time, explaining some of the contradictions. The reason it doesn't work very well as a book is there is a lot of background information the writers expected the readers to know that now most people don't

[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (13 children)

How else would you read the Bible?

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Under duress, with crushing feelings of obligation, guilt, shame, horror, and dread of course 😄

[–] Colonel_Panic_@eviltoast.org 15 points 1 day ago

This guy Bibles.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I like some of the stories in the Bible but it's still pretty hard to read. I don't know why, I don't have that problem with other, even older writings. There is nothing confusing about the Enuma Elish, for example. I think the Epic of Gilgamesh is freaking great.

But when the Bible steals a story told in the Epic of Gilgamesh and makes it Noah's flood, it loses all meaning. The original wasn't all that exciting to begin with but there was a deep meaning to it being in the Epic. But in the Bible, what is the meaning? What's the moral to the story? It just doesn't work.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And then the writer just pulled the most unimaginative deus ex machina and the hero just "comes back" from the dead, pff lazy writing.

[–] Rusty@lemmy.ca 14 points 23 hours ago

I was raised without any religion and when I was 6 I found "Bible for kids" in a fairy tale section of the library. I've read it thinking that it's a weird fairy tale.

[–] night_petal@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The more entertaining read is God saying "fuck you, in particular" to Job.

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It is entertaining in a fucked up way that god kills his family and then at the end is like "uhh.. here's a new, entirely different family, let us never speak of this again"

[–] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

relevant Crimes New Roman book report on Hell is the Absence of God

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3l35CZK0LY

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had a youth pastor that said if someone made movies out of the Bible, they would all be R-rated and very popular because of all the drama, sex, and violence.

But for some reason it’s okay for little kids to read that shit out loud to each other.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 19 hours ago

Their idea is interesting, but there's plenty of material out there that's absolutely loaded with drama, sex, and violence that no one cares to watch.

But religious people do love watching religious material. Those Hallmark films don't make themselves.

[–] FilthyHands@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago

"I started reading the bible. It Sucks. I can't get past the first chapter. Don't buy this author's books."

  • Sir Baby of Cakes
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

Well, it is fiction, so there's that.

[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe the author saw his own work, decided it's shit and the only way to redeem it was to make a religion out of it.

[–] IntrovertTurtle@lemmy.zip 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

You could make a religion out of this!

Source

[–] Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Dank Christian memes

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago

I find it interesting to consider that Judas was designated by Jesus for the task, in order to fulfill the prophetic criteria in the book of Daniel, which many prophetic figures in Judea were obsessed with, not just the Jesus movement.

load more comments
view more: next ›