Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
100% i think any transgression where the harm is diffuse but the benefit is immense should be punishable by complete claiming of the entire wealth of a person, along with anything they have granted to their kin.
Someone who murders in rage may be reformed. Someone who screws people in sales, or embezzles a pension fund, or directs a contract towards a friend understands only the cold non-morality of coins.
I did some digging, and the mastermind of the scheme Allen was involved in (who he helped investigators nail, one of the main reasons his sentence was reduced) was sentenced to 30 years. However, he was only forced to hand over a paltry $38.5 million, out of $3 billion?! Barely 1% of the defrauded amount!
Seems like it'd be pretty straightforward to, as a rule, penalize for the entire 'profit' of the fraud as a baseline, then you can add the fee (otherwise, you'd still just be breaking even if caught) on top of that.
Seems like it’d be pretty straightforward
You'd think so, but the entire legal system is set up to protect the bourgeois and their interests (including maintaining a productive level of poverty and violence) not actual justice or human flourishing.
It's why you get a harsher penalty for "breaking into" a bin full of discarded produce than defrauding thousands of pensions.
Cool and good.
That's 1%. $300,000,000 would be 10%.
Now let's see Paul Allen's jailcell
See, if you successfuly steal $3bn, that means God loves you or whatever
Homeless guy failed to steal $100 (he felt bad about it lmao), so he’s evil
I wonder how far you can push morality.
"If god loved you then we would have been made to give you 40 months, the fate made us give you 3 years instead. Therefore it's just."
Meanwhile in Vietnam:
i think her sentenced got commuted, or reduced to life imprisonment last i heard.
If you have the power to confiscate their wealth, you've already 'won' - there is no need for the death penalty at that point.
Maybe, but it is satisfying to see.
I'm not a fan of Marxist Leninists, but executing scammers like her is something that I gleefully relish.
I'm annoyed by it saying he got 'slightly less' that the six years prosecutors wanted. 40 months is 3 1/3 years. That's not slightly less than six years, that's almost half.
"It is the duty of the poor to support and sustain the rich in their power and idleness. In doing so, they have to work before the laws' majestic equality, which forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread."
Anatole France
"The petty thief is imprisoned but the big thief becomes a feudal lord."
Look at the bright side. The homeless man don't have to sleep outside anymore
Not sure the judge had that in mind when sentencing but for some people prison is preferable to homelessness.
I met a homeless man in Kiel. He was homeless in the summer and checked in at rehab in the winter. He thought that was great.
It's not a criminal justice system you have, it's a citizen suppression tool. No justice will be found, and the vast majority of "dangerous criminals" in the system are there for petty drug crimes. Many fraudulently brought by a corrupt system intent of painting a certain skin colour a certain way.
Some things to consider, for those interested in objectivity:
P.S. The Snopes article on this is 15 years old, so imagine the age of the actual screenshot.
[^2]: > Brown admitted walking up to a teller with one of his hands under his jacket and telling her it was a "stickup."
Also, his was a violent crime
The violent crime he committed according to a liberal:
Brown admitted walking up to a teller with one of his hands under his jacket and telling her it was a "stickup."
Threatening to shoot and kill someone if they don't give you what you want, even if the victim is not aware you're not actually armed, definitely counts, don't know what point you're trying to make.
Also, I quoted that exact line in my own comment, why are you bringing that up in your reply as if it's information I concealed/withheld or something?
It only counts only in a bullshit legal system way, of which no normal person should give the time of day too.
Poverty and stolen working class money actually kills people, finger guns do not.
To even pretend it is the other way around is the most vile fucking liberal take imaginable.
TBH I've been stabbed and I've been scammed and guess what set me back less.
If you're in the US, the medical bills might cost you more than both
Sure, whatever. Say that capitalism is bad and America is a fascist dictatorship or I'm going to downvote you.
Said bigger fish got 30 years.
Here's your tomato tomato. I'm not hugely familiar with crimlaw (everyone in the family did civil if they were in legal so those are the proceedings I'm familiar with) but the few criminal proceedings I followed closely, they'd pick one defendant and get all the others to turn on them. If you'd flip, you'd get 2 years for conspiracy. If you didn't, you'd get 25 for wasting the court's time.
I remember about twenty years ago, some assholes lost a company half a billion dollars got 6 months probation vs the 72 year old woman going through bankruptcy, who hid 30 grand of assets, she got 12 years.
It's all bullshit
Well. That seems fair, I mean, 40 is bigger than 15... /S