this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
757 points (99.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

28488 readers
1116 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago)

Congratulations! You've won an iPhone! Click our secure link to claim your prize! We promise this is not a Rip Off!

https://secure.ic6do.com/tRn4TI_ip_grab

EDIT: Please do click the link so my joke can land

EDIT 2: Sorry I'm too much of a wimp to even happy-prank people

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 7 points 2 hours ago
[–] drkt_@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

What even is the point of URL shorteners? I always understood it as a Twitter thing, but I see them more outside of Twitter.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

I think sometimes it gives people analytics on how many people click the link when the link is to something they themselves don't control. But I'm not entirely sure if that's a common service shorteners offer.

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 1 points 32 minutes ago

They also sometimes give you the ability to change what the link points to which is great if you send out a link only to realise it went to the wrong place after the fact.

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 2 points 45 minutes ago (1 children)

I find it handy for writing down a URL on paper

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

Okay, grandpa.

JK

[–] eru@mouse.chitanda.moe 2 points 1 hour ago
[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 15 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

When sharing links with people in places where there’s a character limit or to avoid polluting visuals.

Also, when sharing like orally or showing it to someone else when you have no other way to communicate it: ex, the link of a shared cloud file

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Infuriatingly, URL shortners are often used in QR codes because they have a character limit-ish (longer strings make for more detailed QR codes, which are harder to scan from further away so it's a trade-off). but if the QR points to a shortened link then it's more difficult to assess where a QR code is pointing without blindly following the link.

[–] 2910000@lemmy.world 1 points 40 minutes ago

My biggest bugbear relating to this is the lack of a short text alternative for QR codes, especially with long URLs.
If the URL is too long to fit into a QR code, then it's also too long for me to type in manually!

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 48 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)
[–] Chaser@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago

Lol, they're even offering emails? Thanks for sharing!

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 12 points 18 hours ago

A very good service by DIE PARTEI

Of course it would be them. Love it. Thanks for the link!

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 9 points 15 hours ago
[–] cheesybuddha@lemmy.world 32 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I totally believe this works, but there's no way I'm clicking on any of those links

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago

I expect most of them are Rickrolls.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 17 hours ago
[–] Illogicalbit@lemmy.world 41 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 41 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Chaser@lemmy.zip 18 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely scary 😬 But link "shortener" may be the wrong name in this case

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 17 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I don't think it purports to be a shortener, just a susener

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 16 points 20 hours ago
[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 132 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] mogranja@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 4 hours ago

Exactly what I expected. Thanks for not letting me down.

[–] cm0002@infosec.pub 96 points 1 day ago (1 children)

listen here, you little shit

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Cm0002:

waltzes into chat about deceptive links

clicks a deceptive link

realizes they have been deceived

Cm0002: "No, it is the person who posted the deceptive link who is wrong".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lukalix98@programming.dev 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Jokes on you I saw the ad first.

[–] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

3/4 of screen space filled with ads, how do you live like this?

[–] lukalix98@programming.dev 2 points 13 hours ago

I don't use yt on my phone. I was actually interested what op put behind the link. I thought it would be a rickroll, but yk, I had to click it. I know, it hurts me too, seeing other people suffer so many ads. Also this is my newest phone and I don't have the time to spend tinkering around ad free stuff.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Once you see the XcQ it's too late.

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It's true. If you recognize the URL enough to avoid it, then you've been rickrolled without even clicking it. Wirelessly brain rickrolled

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 90 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Looks like it got too creepy for its own good.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Link shorteners and redirectors, especially new and lesser-known ones tend to get caught in the fray with things like Google Safe Browsing (which FF uses as well) and Smart Screen.

It's because the original/shortened link gets reported and not the real/destination site. Then the domain (of the shortener/redirector) gets flagged, instead of the real site.

This happened to me at work this very week, with a redirector service that's a part of our email security stack. FF and Chrome were both blocking links that were safe, because the redirector service itself was classified as sus.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 69 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Based on these ads, I do not trust the site anyway.

Sketchy dark pattern ads

Love the concept, though.

[–] wischi@programming.dev 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ad for an ad-blocker. Genius 🤣

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably the only ad ever to hit exactly and only the correct target demographic.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Doubtful. If you still have ads in 2026 you never valued your own time, software, or consent anyways.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 30 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Firefox is not playing around

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 4 points 17 hours ago

My ISP, O₂CZ (who collaborates with an Israeli cybersecurity company to "protect" (and spy on) everyone with default DNS settings) also blocks this one

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

this got me rickrolled (after so long)

[–] alamgirr@programming.dev 1 points 12 hours ago

This looks like an awesome project idea to steal

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 13 hours ago

Thunder app tries to load mp4 💀

[–] ArfArfWoof@europe.pub 53 points 1 day ago

alive internet theory

load more comments
view more: next ›