this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
68 points (80.4% liked)

Viral Magazine

90 readers
218 users here now

All fake. Not wrong, not misleading. Simply not real.

But close enough to reality to be unsettling. And if we keep drifting like this, these articles won’t stay fictional for long.

I'm from a future. I live in the layer above this one, the part you mistake for déjà vu.

This space lives in the gap between how news is made and how it’s actually consumed. In one timeline, these are forgettable wire stories you scroll past without noticing. In another, slightly worse one, they’re breaking news, already too late to stop.

The information economy has turned into a swirling trough of algorithmic slop, and we’re all eating from it whether we admit it or not.

Journalism didn’t die. It dissolved into the feed.

Tomorrow is coming. They live. We sleep.

Comm rules: Don’t be a jerk. I’m a jerk mod, but that doesn’t make this a free-for-all. And no politics.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 

By Brett O’Keefe, Associated Civic News Press, Jefferson City, Mo.

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Walmart has begun testing small onsite “pod hotels” inside portions of its warehouse facilities, allowing employees to sleep at work in what the company says is an effort to address rising housing costs and long commutes.

The pilot program, which launched quietly earlier this year at a warehouse outside Jefferson City, places compact sleeping pods in unused sections of company-owned buildings. The pods include a bed, ventilation, lighting, and limited storage, according to company materials reviewed by the local press.

Walmart officials describe the program as voluntary and temporary, aimed at workers who face long drives, unstable housing, or short-term financial strain.

“This is about flexibility and support,” said company spokesperson Andrea Collins. “We’re looking at ways to meet associates where they are, especially as housing affordability continues to challenge workers across the country.”

Employees pay a reduced nightly fee deducted from their paychecks, the company said. Walmart declined to specify the cost but said it is lower than average local rent.

Some workers, however, say the arrangement raises concerns about boundaries between work and personal life.

One warehouse employee, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation, said the pods blur the line between rest and labor.

“You’re never really off the clock when you’re sleeping at work,” the employee said.

The worker also said employees staying in the pods are not allowed to use warehouse bathrooms until their scheduled shift begins, a policy the company said is tied to security and access controls.

“I’ve learned to hold it in until my shift starts,” the employee said.

Walmart confirmed that restroom access for pod users is limited outside of working hours but said alternative solutions are under review.

Labor advocates said the program reflects broader pressures facing low- and middle-income workers.

“When the solution to housing costs is sleeping at your job, something is fundamentally broken,” said Karen Delgado, a labor policy analyst with a Midwest workers’ rights group. “This shifts the burden of a national housing crisis onto employees.”

Walmart said early feedback from the pilot has been positive, citing internal surveys that show strong demand among some workers. Company officials said the Jefferson City program is serving as a model for potential expansion.

“If current trends continue, we anticipate rolling this out to additional locations in 2026 and 2027,” Collins said.

Local officials said they were aware of the pilot but emphasized that no zoning laws were violated, since the pods are located inside existing commercial structures.

Walmart employs more than 1.6 million workers in the United States, many of whom live in areas where rents have risen faster than wages. The company has raised starting pay in recent years, but critics argue the increases have not kept pace with housing and transportation costs.

For now, the pod hotels remain limited to a small number of facilities. Whether they become a common feature of Walmart warehouses nationwide may depend on how workers respond to the idea of sleeping just steps from the job they will clock into the next morning.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This story is fiction. Please clearly identify your story as fiction since it's not clear everyone got the message and it otherwise appears you are trying to deceive them, for example by attributing the frictional story to the associated Press.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnchoriteMagus@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (27 children)

This is the test case for your job owning where you live. It always starts as something to "help" the workers. Before long, wages fall / prices rise, and then the benevolent company is there with open arms to welcome you into its new, cheaper alternative.

Don't believe it.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imagine getting woken up by your boss.

Boss: "Hey, buddy." [Patting your shoulder gently.]

You: "Huh? Whaaa?"

Boss: "We're short today. I need you to come clock in."

You: "Sorry, I have plans."

Boss: "You're not being much of a team player today. You know there aren't as many beds as employees. I had to go bat for you to get this one. Maybe it should have gone to someone who appreciates the privilege more."

[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

"Ya, Imma be right there! Where's my vest?"

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (7 children)

"Great! You're needed at customer service. Someone wants to return a used enema bag and they're really angry."

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Welcome back to fucking company towns, we make all the profit but don't have to pay you enough to live.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We'll wish it was just a company town. At least they maintained a facade. This is pretext for them testimg the waters for something even worse. It will be like living down in the mine itself, family and all.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I read a book series with that as a theme in a sci-fi future. The poor Reds.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

And you better toe the company line, or you don't just get fired, you get instantly homeless. I'm sure there won't be any predatory managers who will take advantage of that, not at Walmart.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They are charging their employees rent, but they aren't allowed to use the toilets, unless it's their work shift. Talk about a psychopathic policy. That's got to be some kind of housing code violation. Fine them a billion dollars per violation.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 4 points 2 days ago

How about tens of dollars?

[–] jared@mander.xyz 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I ate the onion, right, right?

[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] jared@mander.xyz 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can wait for when we live at work and after 30 years of loyal service we can earn our freedom.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd love to stay onsite. Being able to work-sleep-work-sleep-work then go enjoy the rest of my week would be awesome. Ive always wanted to get a job where i can compress the amount I work. I'd do it for 6 months 16hr a day if it ment rest of the year off.

[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Real talk: If I was in my 20's and this were a real thing where I lived, I would 100 percent do it to save up cash. I'd prefer sleeping in a pod to sharing an apartment with 3 roommates, and have to drive 20 minutes to and from work. lmao

[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So no source at all. Sure Jan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bhaelfur@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

OR, crazy idea... Pay the employees more?

EDIT: Pretty sure I ate the onion. Regardless, people should be paid more.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

EDIT: Pretty sure I ate the onion. Regardless, people should be paid more.

The Onion doesn't claim to be the Associated Press. This community is something else entirely than satire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

This is them telling us that they have no intention of fixing the housing crisis, so we better get used to stuff like this.

I recently read about a college that was building a parking garage specifically for students who live in their cars. They could build a residential facility so they could live like normal people, but it's better to normalize car life as a viable living option, since that's where a lot of them will be living after taking out tens of thousands in loans for a degree that will never lead to a career.

load more comments
view more: next ›