this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
798 points (99.6% liked)

politics

27143 readers
3012 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 295 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Which is a violation of his oath of office, which is ample grounds for impeachment.

Shame that Congress is full of feckless cowards

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 125 points 3 days ago (3 children)

"Hey buddy, get in line." - the other 10-15 things he's done that other presidents would have gotten impeached for.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What's crazy is Trump has already been impeached! TWICE!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 52 points 3 days ago

And found guilty of 34 felonies and (in a civil case) raping a woman.

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

God damn. I love Star Wars, but why is Star Wars almost a documentary these days? Between this, Obi-Wan’s speech about the fall of the temple, and the events of Attack of the Clones…we just don’t have spaceships.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The political things that happen in Star Wars have happened in our real life history, often more than once. It's not that Star Wars is starting to sound like a documentary, it's just that we're repeating the same stupid, short sighted, errors that those movies took inspiration from.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

The fact that even the vast, legendary popularity of Star Wars hasn't helped in that regard kind of makes me question the ability of fiction to make an impact in society's way of thinking, sad as that is to consider

[–] cybernihongo@reddthat.com 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Watching the prequels in the current year made me appreciate just a little bit how... so forward thinking they were. Emperor Palatine didn't become an emperor overnights, you see, he was made into a Chancellor democratically and then he just... played chess against himself to eventually become Emperor.

Granted the modern breed of fash spreading all over the world aren't that horrifically smart, but it's true.

This is how liberty dies!

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Isn’t Palpatine just a re-telling of Hitler’s rise to power.

Also storm trooper are just stormtroopers and most of the rest of it is WW2 in space.

[–] jeeva@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I thought I'd heard it (at least the original) was based on the Vietnam war, with the US inspiring the empire.

But Palpatine doesn't really feature until far later, so it may well be a mix.

Edit: https://screenrant.com/star-wars-george-lucas-vietnam-war-inspiration-explainer/ is a start.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 8 points 3 days ago

If anything, that might be a low estimate

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 17 points 3 days ago

I dont think theyre cowards per se. I think this is how the "democracy" is intended to work?

Trump looks after oligarchs, oligarchs make donations to campaigns to get senators elected, senators support Trump.

Its not so much that theyre cowards, theyre just serving the people who got them elected, and thats not the voters.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (4 children)

He commits crimes against the constitution every day. Is something going to be done about it?

[–] seerdomin1983@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Probably not. Decades of political rot have come to this.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

We need 100 years of McCarthyism against right wing lunatics

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

The politicians sure as fuck aren’t doing anything. Maybe a post on social media or a 5 second statement on the news. That’s it. Nothing else. They are making money off this and can advance their agendas. They don’t give a fuck about America or its people.

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Congress doesn't want to have a record of members approving this, but they have decided that they will let it go forward

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As other countries in the world showed in recent years, constitutions are worthless pieces of paper.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

And some like Brazil and South Korea showed that constitutions were law

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 80 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Not an american but is the famous american "checks and balances" need to be turned off and on again or smt? It doesn't seem to be working.

[–] Ach@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm American and I'm not convinced it was ever turned on. Pretty sure it was theorized and marketed well and all of you believed it as much as we did.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Just part of the elementary school indoctrination.

The real tip off was that we had a song for how great the flag is :)

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

The "checks and balances" depend on putting ambitious people in different parts of the government, and giving them competing roles. Then, naturally, excesses get curbed because no one part of the government would want to cede too much of its power to the other.

It did not forsee a future where the leaders of the other co-equal branches of government would subjugate themselves to the President's ego.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's definitely not working now. It got destroyed after 9/11 - Bush was only too happy about the opportunity to make some changes that had already been waiting in a drawer for who knows how many years - and it's honestly a miracle it took so long for someone to exploit its absence to its fullest extent.

But arguably it all went downhill long before Bush.

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Checks and balances is working exactly as the founding fathers envisioned.

...by cashing checks and hoarding balances.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The founders were mostly slave/land owning robber barons. Washington was one of the most wealthiest people in the colonies…

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah the only reason they didn't want to remain a colony was because they thought they could become more wealthy personally breaking off from the British empire, seizing more land from the natives, and taking more land from Britain's other colony of Canada.

Then bind all the states and their settlers and natives by saddling them with national debt to lock them into a unfettered capitalist experiment on an unexploited resource rich land with the moral framework of civilising and subsuming the native population.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

They ripped the CPU out of the socket, cut traces around the motherboard, stole the ram and paid off the IT staff and management to look the other way.

Apparently, and who would have guessed it, laws only work when people are willing to follow and or enforce them.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 84 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cool. What of it then? I get it, but it doesn’t really mean anything if accountability is optional nowadays.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So the grants must be reinstated.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They’ll just appeal it to the supreme court who will rule that actually it’s totally cool

[–] minnow@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The absolute least we can do is force them to jump through the hoops. Like, I get that it feels pointless but it's better than just giving up and letting them do whatever they want.

They WANT you to feel like there's no point so that you'll give up. They want you to give up because that's the easiest way for them to win. Why give them the satisfaction? They haven't actually won yet, but even if I can never win I'll won't give up no matter how impossible the victory, and neither should you.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

Also it helps build up a solid case if shit goes to civil war, easier to get international aid if the list of things the feds have done is long and itemized. Also helps justify it to the population both within and without such anti trump territory.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

MFW people say the Democrats are “tearing this country apart”

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 44 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Amazing. I cant wait to see what the consequences are.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

I've under taken the arduous trip and located the answer. To save you the trouble, I've drawn a map.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wish the media stop addressing him as President for the rest of his term he only cares about his ego and white supremacy. Trump has show something being illegal doesn't matter if you just don't care.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] generic_computers@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It would probably be a shorter article to list the amendments he hasn't violated!

I tried to make a post of what that would look like but it wouldnt let me submit it since it was empty.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Incoming Truth Social post....

"This PROVES that Demonrat states are run by crooks, because only criminals use the Fifth Amendment!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trump, "What do you mean 'ammendment'? Where are you getting this? Nobody has heard of these ammendments you're talking about...."

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

Ammendment is when u edit a twitter

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 days ago

Trump's violated so many laws and under aged women and got no consequences so why would he stop?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Wait, I know the 5th Amendment! That's an important one! That's the one that says I don't have to admit to my crimes! I'm the best in the world at that one!"

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"It's my favorite Bible verse!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

"Not my president" because he refuses to be.

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Such a pathetic little spiteful coward of a man.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›