this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
114 points (99.1% liked)

Europe

8440 readers
633 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/56844329

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Meanwhile China is performing the exact pivot to renewables that needs to happen. When an authoritarian state is more positive for the future of humanity, Europe needs to quit the excuses and answer seriously. Saving the soul of democracy requires seriously muzzling capital and its capacity for destruction.

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 27 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

If only all the billions spent on AI would have been spent on tackling climate protection, we would have clean energy and a ton of new jobs.

Whereas AI is doing the opposite, destroying the planet and taking jobs.

[–] Ismay@programming.dev 3 points 10 hours ago

Yeah but AI is aiming at removing workers... So more money for them !

Well worth destroying the world !

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

At this point we don't even need to spend billions subsidizing green energy; it's already cheaper than fossil fuels on the free market. We're now subsidizing bad shit out of sheer hate and suicidal contrarianism for contrarianism's sake.

(And blatant corruption and graft. That's a big reason for the otherwise literally clinically insane fossil fuel subsidies, too.)

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 4 points 13 hours ago

I'd say corruption and grift is the actual why, "sheer hate and suicidal contrarianism for contrarianism’s sake" is somehow how it's successfully sold to the masses.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

You can't recharge a tank on a battle field. Fossil fuels must exist until the conflict between the multipolar world and the rule based world is settled. Bonus points for drying up Iran and opening the northern shipping routes. Also overall, a warmer earth should create more rain.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Problem with any fossil powered equipment in 2026 is that is that it is very easy to detect with cheap IR cameras, which makes it a target for drones, missiles or artillery.

[–] HaiZhung@feddit.org 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Not with that attitude you can’t

[–] plyth@feddit.org 0 points 9 hours ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_density_Extended_Reference_Table

It's not attitude but availability. Right now gasoline is the best option.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Wish we could... But we can't reject the argument because we don't control the story. The guys getting insanely rich from fossil fuels and buying media (and politicians) do. And the majority of people blindly believes everything if they just hear it often enough.