WE.DONT.WANT.GREENLAND. wtf is going on here?? How are we turning into the bad guys here????? WHO ASKED FOR THIS??
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
205 points (99.0% liked)
World News
54464 readers
3219 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1/3 of the population who voted red and 1/3 of the population who didn't vote because "voting doesn't matter"
236M of America's 343M residents were eligible to vote. So we're talking about 70% of the population, baseline.
Of the eligible pool, only 174M were legally registered, because our voter registration system is archaic and deliberately exclusionary. We also nixed mail in voting after 2020, driving down participation for rural and minority communities enormously (because our voting infrastructure is dogshit). This depressed actual turnout to 153M.
Of that 153M, it broke out 77M Trump and 75M Kamala. But get under the hood and recognize only five states actually mattered by vote margin - Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, and Georgia. Every absent voter in California turning out for Harris couldn't help her. Record turnout in Texas helped Trump more than Biden in 2020.
Of the five swing states, four (excluding Georgia) produced statewide wins for Democrats. These were winnable elections for Team D. They came within a razor thin margin - less than 2% of total votes each - at both Presidential and state levels.
And yet Harris was so fucking unpopular that people refused to vote for her in states other Democrats won.
Let that sink in.
And yet Harris was so fucking unpopular that people refused to vote for her in states other Democrats won.
Either that or there was election fraud in the Presidential race that was absent in the down-ballot races.
I'm not saying I think that's what happened, but I do think there were enough statistical anomalies to warrant an investigation.
And yet Harris was so fucking unpopular that people refused to vote for her in states other Democrats won.
Is that really surprising, considering that she said herself that she wouldn't deviate from anything Biden did before?
Biden got an extra 6M votes.
Of course, Biden had to slog through a primary with stiff opposition from a socialist challenger. Meanwhile, Harris was handed the nomination absent any democratic input.
So, who can say?
Some other things to consider are misogyny and racism. I mean, at least in the US she is considered "black".
States that happily vote for Joni Ernest and Sarah Huckabee Sanders don't get to write themselves off as misogynist.
Conservatives that nominated Hershall Walker and Tim Scott and Wesley Hunt don't get to hide behind the race card.
If Harris were a Republican, she'd be doing fine.
How are we turning into the bad guys here
The US?? The US has been like this for a long long time but you guys have just dropped the charade and started attacking countries closer to home. Trump's just too much of an idiot to come up with a half-believable sounding casus belli
The US citizens when they elected Trump, again. Apparently voting matters.
WHO ASKED FOR THIS?
The Trump regime's sponsors, Israel, and Russia.
Probably
The voters
Whatever this bullshit timeline is, I want off it.
Why does he even want it?
Strategic positioning and resources that weren't available prior to the effects of climate change.
Trump doesnt actually care about any of that since that is only going to matter long after he's gone. He's old and unhealthy and feeling his mortality. If he actually manages to increase US territory then he will have an actual tangible legacy, that's why he wants it.
Instigating external conflicts to distract from domestic issues is a long-standing tradition of shitty leaders throughout history, and that is the other dimension to this.
This is absolutely true but not mutually exclusive to the interests of the powers behind trump.
Are you under the impression Trump is still in charge?
Trump doesn't, but the people who whisper in his ear do
OK, why do they want it?
To dismantle NATO and generally weaken the west.
It is also a theoretically strategic important location for a future northern route between Europe, Asia, and North America if/when the polar icecaps melt.
It gives a direct route from the USA through the Arctic to the entire coastline of Northern Europe and Russia, and it places the USA on every side of Canada, surrounding it. So it makes it easier for the USA's military to reach Europe, Russia and Asia, and easier to seize Canada by force, should Trump decide to follow through on his threats.
Sadly I think we’re gonna see NATO fall apart when article 5 is triggered. Even if another NATO ally attacks a NATO ally, that wouldn’t dissolve it. What will is when the attacked nation enacts the article and no one is willing to help. Especially if the aggressor is the US.
Control of the Arctic circle. We expect shipping lanes to open up and new access natural resources. Thanks to climate change.
I recall reading something about an old technocracy thing that Elon dad loved, and as I recall Elon fell in love with the idea
Ultimately its in these neanderthal brains that since global warming is happening and these morons are too poor to move to New Zealand or have their own megayacht then building a bunker in Greenland is their next best option. I think they got the subliminal idea from a movie that was about their shrinking dicks.
A few reasonAs the polar ice caps melt even more and war likely ramps up, having a very large base of operations in the North Atlantic has a lot of strategic value. That makes the generals like it.
The oligarchs like it because, as global warming intensifies, Greenland will likely be prime real estate. It is similar to why they want to annex Canada.
And putin wants it because it will likely kill NATO and the EU. Because Greenland is... weird. It is technically part of Denmark but also isn't. It is an ally of the EU but it isn't actually IN the EU. So it will be very easy for the EU to basically say "We don't want a war. Whatever. Take one for the team Denmark" which will pretty much guarantee its death because no nation will trust any other nation to "have their back" in the event of a war.
It also means the USA militarily surrounds Canada on every side, which is significant given Trump's frequently expressed desire to annex Canada.
I'm.... "optimistic" is not at all the right word considering how depressing all of this is.
But I'm Something that the US has no intentions of using military force against Canada (so just economic and political...). trump can demand whatever he wants but even the lowly colonels will soil themselves at the thought and find ways to refuse.
Because starting a war in The Middle East or Venezuela or even Europe is one thing. Pretty much nothing can actually hurt the continental US without fighting through a fleet of aircraft carriers and all our airbases.
Whereas Canada and Mexico share pretty massive borders with us. If they want to retaliate, they will.
Of course... its trump so he might very well just tell people on twitter to go throw pipe bombs across the border to get the war he wants.
Fighting Canada would go about as well as Russia into Ukraine, with less fighters and an ineffective Navy.
Oh. It would go about 4.45x worse (ignoring Alaska). And russia can't even properly protect their border and prevent Ukrainian strike teams from crossing it.
Putin told him to do it.
Not rellevant. There is no good reason for wanting to take over another country
*relllevant
*rellllevant
What?! Of course there are reasons, loads of them. We're not talking about morality here.
This is a good video on the topic - 2 years old so not just based on this week’s hubbub.
It serves as a base to block European assistance for the American invasion of us in Canada, along with Mexico and any other country Americans decide they want
Warmongering cespit of a country
Greed and power mostly.
This is being done for two reasons
- To distract from Epstein
- Because it’s good for Russia
And the crappy part is, was can't protest by burning the white house because trump's already trashed it
I mean... there is a shitty golf course he loves a lot more than anything outside of his daughter's snatch.
Gotta completely desecrate it so it doesn’t come back as a zombie. Canada, the e-vites are in your inboxes since you know how to throw a proper bbq.
Eh we still can, for giggles and shits if nothing else.
We STRONGLY Don't 100% like this!
-The EU!