this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
205 points (99.0% liked)

World News

51953 readers
2708 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a statement, the White House told the BBC that Trump had made clear that acquiring Greenland was a "national security priority".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A few reasonAs the polar ice caps melt even more and war likely ramps up, having a very large base of operations in the North Atlantic has a lot of strategic value. That makes the generals like it.

The oligarchs like it because, as global warming intensifies, Greenland will likely be prime real estate. It is similar to why they want to annex Canada.

And putin wants it because it will likely kill NATO and the EU. Because Greenland is... weird. It is technically part of Denmark but also isn't. It is an ally of the EU but it isn't actually IN the EU. So it will be very easy for the EU to basically say "We don't want a war. Whatever. Take one for the team Denmark" which will pretty much guarantee its death because no nation will trust any other nation to "have their back" in the event of a war.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It also means the USA militarily surrounds Canada on every side, which is significant given Trump's frequently expressed desire to annex Canada.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm.... "optimistic" is not at all the right word considering how depressing all of this is.

But I'm Something that the US has no intentions of using military force against Canada (so just economic and political...). trump can demand whatever he wants but even the lowly colonels will soil themselves at the thought and find ways to refuse.

Because starting a war in The Middle East or Venezuela or even Europe is one thing. Pretty much nothing can actually hurt the continental US without fighting through a fleet of aircraft carriers and all our airbases.

Whereas Canada and Mexico share pretty massive borders with us. If they want to retaliate, they will.


Of course... its trump so he might very well just tell people on twitter to go throw pipe bombs across the border to get the war he wants.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fighting Canada would go about as well as Russia into Ukraine, with less fighters and an ineffective Navy.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Oh. It would go about 4.45x worse (ignoring Alaska). And russia can't even properly protect their border and prevent Ukrainian strike teams from crossing it.