this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
540 points (96.1% liked)

Greentext

7588 readers
396 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Rice requires hours just to filter out all the stones from it.

[–] frog@feddit.uk 179 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Wheat is easier to grow and requires less water. The first farmers in the Middle East became farmers almost acidentally. When they transported the wheat, the dropped crop started growing more and closer to where they were processing it. Eventually some of them decided they would rather grow the wheat than being part of a nomadic tribe. This will eventually lead to a population boom where women would have children every year rather than every four years.

[–] GorGor@startrek.website 111 points 1 week ago

Also more protein in wheat compared to rice. Actually a lot more nutrients in wheat compared to rice.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Ok great but how did they figure out you could EAT IT if you did a shitload of seemingly random shit to it that you don’t have to do with, like, any other crop?

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sounds like you're assuming step 1 of eating it was processing it into bread. Beyond that, ancient people eventually tried to eat everything. Seeds, grains, and nuts were not uncommon.

[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah makes sense, thats always kind of how I thought it went down. Can’t be picky about your calories, can ya, great great great great great great great granpappy Cruxifux.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 39 points 1 week ago (9 children)

You don't have to do all of that to eat it, you just have to do all of that to make bread. You can make bread from oats, you can also process it less and make porridge.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (5 children)

All you need to do to make wheat edible is soak it in water to make it soft enough to chew. Wheat in water is "gruel".

You can improve upon it by boiling, which will make porridge, or baking, which will dehydrate the gruel into a primitive bread. The drained, starchy liquid, if left to sit for awhile, will become a primitive ale. Pre-grinding makes it easier to eat.

Every dietary use is an evolutionary progression from soaking wheat in water.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 112 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (10 children)

Boiled wheat is perfectly edible, actually. Tasty? Not really, but I didn't grow up on it and we're extremely spoilt compared to prehistoric peoples. Stuff like boiled barley kernels (AFAIK you can't really make bread with barley) was still a relatively common dish 1-200 hundred years ago in my parts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groat_(grain)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_barley

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Significant point: "Edible" is subject to discussion. Not more than 100 years ago, the expected diet in large parts of Norway was boiled fish, boiled potatoes, and some form of boiled grain. For every meal. Your entire life. Vitamins? Go chew on that shrub until the scurvy goes away.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GorGor@startrek.website 24 points 1 week ago

Beef barley soup is delicious

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (6 children)

You can absolutely make barley bread. It just won't be very fluffy or rise, since there's no gluten in it.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Sir and/or Madam,

Have you heard the good word about maize (corn)? 🌽

[–] AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

WHAT UP MOTHER SHUCKERS

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Anon is not thinking enough about beer

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip 63 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can boil wheat too. Ancient peoples used to make porridge

[–] grue@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And by "porridge" you mean "beer".

Booze was the real motivator.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Guy: look at all this wheat I grew!

Fella; Wow, we could make so many bread!

Guy: Yes... Ah... Bread

[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Rice needs just as much processing. Do you think the rice you buy in the store is what it's like in the field?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adminofoz@lemmy.cafe 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Be hooman, eat much seed. Seed good. Wheat like seed. Wheat good. Rock smash seed, easy eat seed.

Rain make smash seed taste funny. Fire make rain smash seed tastey. Society.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 51 points 1 week ago

Wheat doesn't actually require all that much. Soak it in water, and it becomes gruel. Let gruel sit around for awhile, the liquid becomes a rudimentary ale. Boil off the liquid, you have a rudimentary bread. Want to make it easier to eat? Grind it before you add the water.

Every other use is an evolution of those basic concepts.

[–] BurnedDonutHole@ani.social 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can't grow rice where there isn't a proper water supply so much so that your field is basically a swamp until it's time to harvest. Meanwhile wheat and barley doesn't need much water to cultivate.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I don't think rice requires water? It just tolerates it fine, so it's useful for pest/weed control?

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

It requires water but not the same stagnant levels it used to. Modern cultivation is done with a series of inter connected Levees that allow the water to flow at lower levels than it used to be grown in.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The number of people who have no clue how much processing goes into making rice edible is hilarious.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I am not old but even I remember my mom spending hours filtering all the stone from rice.

[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Or just to grow it. Rice is stupid hard compared to wheat.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

In California, native Americans made acorn porridge. They collected the acorns, shelled and roasted them, ground it into a flour, then leached it because it's full of bitter tannins, and then they can cook the leached acorn meal into a porridge. It is crazy and multiple steps to get there. Mind blowing stuff.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

One guy can grow and harvest a wheat field large enough to feed his family, but rice requires a lot of community organization to grow.

[–] HeadyBroccoli@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (6 children)

There’s an interesting hypothesis called the Rice Hypothesis that theorizes that the different styles of farming rice vs wheat shaped our societies in ways that are still prevalent today. Farming rice led to strong collectivism in society, while farming wheat led to strong individualism in society. Perhaps this is what has led to our differences in ideologies and governing systems.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 39 points 1 week ago

Chaffing it, and then grinding it and adding water aren't exactly rocket science. Also you didn't have any smartphones to keep you from being bored.

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's pretty simple, really. Rice doesn't grow everywhere.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can confirm. I'm currently at Tim Horton's and there's no rice growing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

This phenomenon is even stronger with (most types of) Maize (excluding sweet corn). It requires heavy processing to be turned into glucose sirup or anything resembling edible food. By default, the grains are extremely durable and very difficult to digest.

But this is essentially what protects it from insects and fungus. Because the grains are so hard to digest by default, they can only be eaten by humans who have the tools to heavily process them before eating; for everyone else it's essentially uninteresting as a food source and that prevents mold and insects.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

We have tried to grind, dry, ferment, bake, broil, boil, and fry everything on the face of the earth. Countless times. Humans have had the same brainpower for ages, just not the same knowledge base.

wheat makes beer

beer yeast and wheat makes bread

wheat made pasta

wheat grows well in colder climates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Rice makes terrible bread. Grind me up some more of that fancy grass please.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Wheat is a more modern staple than you might imagine. Millet was more widespread than rice or wheat for much of Eurasia.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The ignorance around rice is what gets me on this one. It's almost troll level.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Don't mind me, just gonna go and internally scream "STONES" for 3 minutes straight over there.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 1 week ago (7 children)

I often wondered this about potatoes. Wild potatoes are extremely poisonous, so who went, the last time we ate one of those we all got sick and a few people died.

Let's cultivate them. I'm sure in just a few thousand years we can turn it into something useful. Of course until then it's kind of just wasted effort but our children's children's children's children's children's children's children's children's children's children will thank us.

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Boiling them in a clay pot, one of the only materials available to them, renders them edible and famously almost nutritionally complete. They are incredibly easy to grow and grow almost anywhere. They were immediately available. "What happens if we boil it" is the basis for quite a lot of staple foods and would have been a human go-to.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›