this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
586 points (99.2% liked)

196

5160 readers
2069 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 54 points 4 days ago (2 children)

For all of you who are as bothered about the axes as I am:

Our hero! ❤️

[–] Legisign@europe.pub 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well, “inchic”, “football field-ic” or “large rock-ic” would be more appropriate than metric.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Legisign@europe.pub 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can’t really get a joke, can you?

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

I get the good ones.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 32 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I don’t understand. It never gives a punchline. Is there an explanation? I assume it’s Nixon leaving the gold standard.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That there is no one explanation is kinda why the site exists, that is the punchline as it were.

The answer you are probably looking for surrounds the fact that Nixon was just as bad a Regan.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 12 points 4 days ago

There is a reason why Nixon was, for decades (even during the Bush administration) considered one of the worst presidents ever.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

A number of things happened in those years. Most relevant might be the energy crisis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1970s_energy_crisis

1971 saw the end of the Bretton Woods System. That was a system of fixed exchange rates between the major western currencies, that facilitated international trade. Governments guaranteed that they would exchange their own currency for US dollars, while the US guaranteed that it would exchange dollars for gold, but only at the request of other countries. In 1971, the US, under Nixon, ended that guarantee. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bretton_Woods_system

The Bretton Woods System was created toward the end of WW2 to avoid problems that plagued the world after WW1. It was extremely successful. Some cranks, aka gold bugs, argue for a gold standard. That means that the government should guarantee to sell gold at a certain fixed price. Economically, that is simply insane. These people like to point to 1971. They won't tell you about the Bretton Woods System, though, or how that guarantee was only for foreign governments.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Damn it just keeps going

[–] JelleWho@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They use metric? You should upgrade the grapgh to be more US like

some good foot vs some bad pound?

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Please fix the horizontal axis label, it should say "time" or "year"

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah. Y should be the metric otherwise it's describes a non function.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Everybody hates Nixon but until trump came along, regan was the worst thing ever. Pissing on regans grave was a key phrase.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago

Crazy how their Thatcher was a bloke and ours was a woman, far from each other in different cultures, yet so alike...

Did we ever see them in the same room? Maybe it was a Mrs Doubtfire situation

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

The sad thing is that the counter new deal predated Reagan. The heritage foundation was started as a way to get neoliberalism from being a theory and into practice.

What is even sadder is that the original liberalism and new deal policies that brought out the best years of growth and prosperity for everyone in the global north only lasted around 30 years or a little more... neoliberalism will almost hit 46 years soon. It fucking stinks.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tammany Hall is dissolved in 1967. Heritage is formed in 1973. Something smells the same.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Fox News around the same time

Fox News was founded by someone who supported Nixon's criminality and hated the fact that the media wanted the truth and didn't suck Dick Nixon's dick.

I really need to find some good resources, look into the players in 1960s Tammany Hall and 1970s heritage and fox and the early republican party and see how all the dirty strings tie together. I wish I could remember how to do history research

It keeps the rich happy and boiled the frogs slowly enough.

[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I how Reagan is burning in hell but he got s lot of help from House Democrats in the 1980s giving him everything he wanted. If they'd oppose him he wouldn't have "achieved" half of what he did.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Neoliberalism was on the rise in both parties. Carter winning on a more conservative platform and then losing because he wasn't hawkish enough really set them on their current path of pursuing the Republicans to the right.

[–] Pyro@programming.dev 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I get your point but that graph labelling is atrocious

[–] groet@feddit.org 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Exactly! X should be "time" and Y "metric"

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Dw Trump has been reversing it

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That would imply he's making things better?