this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
174 points (97.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1670 readers
16 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I sent the MOD this message:

Hi XXXXXXXX, I just noticed that you banned me 2 hours ago from c/Science for Spam. I am confused. I mostly lurk and haven’t commented or posted anything in several months. I definitely don’t post ads or spam. Can you please let me know what happened?

The only reason that I noticed that I am banned is that I watched that (long-ish) video about Brainrot on the feed and the top comment is asking for a tldw.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 111 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It was probably an admin ban. They ban if non-.ml users downvote anything on their instance. And if you ask about it they'll block you.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 78 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wow.

All the more reason to simply filter out ml

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i just block the tankie triad, instances, unfortunately you have to block individual users seperately.

[–] cloudless@piefed.social 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

With PieFed you can block all users of an instance.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Although they can still comment and vote on your stuff (you just won't see it).

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] aloofPenguin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

do you still have to block the other two (hexbear and the other one, can't remember the name rn.)? I have .ml blocked, but I thought the other 2 got de-federated so blocking them wouldn't be necessary?

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Both hexbear.net and lemmygrad.ml are defederated from your instance of lemmy.world (see their names in the blocked part of instances, so you are safe there.:-)

Be aware though that you don't truly have Lemmy.ml blocked - that function is horribly misleading and despite how you requested to "block" the entire instance, and how Lemmy devs marketed it as a personal type of defederation, that was a lie and instead users from those instances can still: read your content, vote on it, reply to it, report it, send you DMs, and trigger notifications, the same as any unblocked user. The only thing it does is "hide communities" from that instance so that you won't see those communities, but you will still see those users everywhere else you go across the wide Threadiverse.

There is really no way to block all users from an instance while you are still using Lemmy. PieFed can easily do this (that feature being available for a year ago, though I doubt Lemmy will ever catch up in that respect - the Lemmy devs have little interest in helping people using their software to block their own personal instance), but other than that you would be looking at now-outdated (iirc) 3rd party apps or implementing custom uBlock Origin filtering rules for the web UI.

If you are interested in checking out PieFed, your own instance maintains both a Lemmy and a PieFed version, the former you are already on and the latter at https://piefed.world/, though I think your Lemmy login probably won't work for both?

[–] aloofPenguin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks for the reply! I found it very informative, also with regards to the blocking.

I do think it's stupid that there's no complete block feature in Lemmy. Also just found out that it apparently has a slower development speed compared to PieFed (with regards to features). This, and the founders of lemmy, are some factors making me consider switching to PieFed. I also heard that there were more features, but also stability concerns. Also most of those extra features are not there on mobile clients yet i believe.

I also checked, and Lemmy login does not work on PieFed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Most do. After a few months of being a new user, people tend to figure it out.

[–] maam@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nice instance choice!

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Seems like the devs of lemmy who also happen to run .ml could add some code to lemmy that lets instances disallow down votes from outside the instance if they want to. Or set it to not display from within the .ml instance so their precious fee fees aren't hurt.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@piefed.zip 12 points 1 week ago

Yeah, they are not powerless to prevent downvote brigades, and serial downvoters. There are a number of ways they can throttle downvote frequency, monitor sources of varying accounts, etc.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

But that power would go both ways. It would allow other instances to interfere with tankie brigading!

[–] MathGrunt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Thank you for that clarification. I'm surprised, but then I suppose there really isn't much else they can do about vote bots and brigades. A warning would have been nice, but given that Lemmy is starting to show evidence of the kind of bots that are killing reddit (and all social media), I can understand their position.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 week ago

No, there's plenty they can do. They're the developers of Lemmy itself, they could easily implement something that limited the interaction of external users. Some instances already have downvotes disabled entirely. But I guess they get off on this.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

There is a serious amount of serial downvoters and upvoters on lemmy to cause drama or direct the flow of conversation. They might let you back in once they realize you're not a bot or a troll.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

Don't act like they just ban anyone who downvotes anything. You've been banned three times for vote spam, and you're literally notorious for downvoting


Edit:

Sources:

https://lemmy.zip/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=22809396
1000013127

https://lemvotes.org/user/frongt@lemmy.zip
1000013128

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lemvotes isn't definitive. But damn that's lopsided for sure.

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Even so, what does it matter? Where is the indication that a user with a high downvote ratio is doing anything harmful, let alone worthy of a permaban?

Edit: Can someone please ban the people downvoting me? I can't deal with this.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's nothing indicating that specifically. But if you're downvoting THAT much more, it's notable. There are people I see that I regularly downvote for solid reasons. Hypocrisy, whataboutism etc. But vote totals don't get that lopsided without some effort. All that means ultimately it's the ratio is lopsided.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 15 points 1 week ago

NoooOoOo you can only have your say with updoots!!!1

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree with this. Far as I'm concerned, even if somebody only engages with posts they hate so all of their interactions are downvotes, why the fuck should they be banned? What does forcing faux positivity gain us? Yes I understand the value in stopping vote manipulation bots, but imo there should need to be more evidence of bot status or nefarious intent than just "downvotes a lot."

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

That's a lot of downvotes!

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 75 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It’s .ml, so it’s to be expected. They have the most fragile power hungry mods around, and zero tolerance for diversity of thought.

Your crime was probably downvoting a post, they don’t like people doing that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 50 points 1 week ago

Thats what you get for fucking existing, asshole

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 46 points 1 week ago
[–] Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus 34 points 1 week ago

It's lemmy.ml, many wear that ban like a medal because if you are somewhat sane you have a good chance of triggering the mods or admins, which are not sane. I've filtered out lemmy.ml long ago, so even if they lift your ban, i'd recommend you do the same instead of engaging there in any form.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Uh. And it's a permanent ban. Not just a temporary timeout for a minor offense... I'd take it as an invitation to switch to different Science/Ask/Open-Source communities on different instances. Might be an improvement anyway. (I mean I myself diversified my subscriptions and left most lemmy.ml ones a long time ago.)

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you thought not lurking ? /J Aside joking, ml is not a good instance, don't bother with them match. I don't for once.

[–] MathGrunt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

I'm beginning to see that. I've found a few other science communities in other instances that I think will work better in my feed.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 16 points 1 week ago

Mander.xyz is a great instance for science, I consider it the science instance.

Ooh! Nice. I just checked it out and subscribed.

[–] gkaklas@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

matrix thread

It has happened to me as well! It's the "vote-only" part that triggers it, to filter out bots

Dessalines:

[...] We don't usually allow vote-only accounts on lemmy.ml, those are mostly bots targeting specific users or communities. That's our rule 4, spamming.

Since it was an .ml account I just stopped using it; I don't know what you could do about voting on .ml communities though (aside from using your account to post more)

[–] Wren@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This makes sense, since I've downvoted .ml posts and admins and haven't been modded, but I wonder if there's a better way to block bots?

You need an account to curate your feed and folks are gonna vote. There shouldn't be an obligation to participate in the comments.

Maybe some kind of random bot test sent to vote-only accounts?

[–] MathGrunt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

I don't have a screenshot of comment or post that caused the ban, because I haven't commented or posted anything whatsoever in more than six months.

Mod has been very active over the last 24 hours but hasn't responded to me.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

!science@mander.xyz

Welcome to your new home.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

So now you're spamming this sub?!?! \s

load more comments
view more: next ›