this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2026
175 points (97.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1678 readers
122 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I sent the MOD this message:

Hi XXXXXXXX, I just noticed that you banned me 2 hours ago from c/Science for Spam. I am confused. I mostly lurk and haven’t commented or posted anything in several months. I definitely don’t post ads or spam. Can you please let me know what happened?

The only reason that I noticed that I am banned is that I watched that (long-ish) video about Brainrot on the feed and the top comment is asking for a tldw.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

Don't act like they just ban anyone who downvotes anything. You've been banned three times for vote spam, and you're literally notorious for downvoting


Edit:

Sources:

https://lemmy.zip/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=22809396
1000013127

https://lemvotes.org/user/frongt@lemmy.zip
1000013128

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lemvotes isn't definitive. But damn that's lopsided for sure.

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Even so, what does it matter? Where is the indication that a user with a high downvote ratio is doing anything harmful, let alone worthy of a permaban?

Edit: Can someone please ban the people downvoting me? I can't deal with this.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's nothing indicating that specifically. But if you're downvoting THAT much more, it's notable. There are people I see that I regularly downvote for solid reasons. Hypocrisy, whataboutism etc. But vote totals don't get that lopsided without some effort. All that means ultimately it's the ratio is lopsided.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

So let's ban those who doesn't downvote enough? /s

It's a stupid argument IMO, and as with all statistics you can show what you want with it. That doesn't mean the person didn't downvote abusively of course, just that you can't tell from global statistics.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 15 points 2 weeks ago

NoooOoOo you can only have your say with updoots!!!1

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree with this. Far as I'm concerned, even if somebody only engages with posts they hate so all of their interactions are downvotes, why the fuck should they be banned? What does forcing faux positivity gain us? Yes I understand the value in stopping vote manipulation bots, but imo there should need to be more evidence of bot status or nefarious intent than just "downvotes a lot."

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 weeks ago

That's a lot of downvotes!

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Oh no, don't use the platform exactly as designed and intended!

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Notorious amongst whom? I don't spam votes, I evaluate each item on its merits as I see them.

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Notorious amongst whom?

There's a post about you on the mildly infuriating comm rn

I don't spam votes, I evaluate each item on its merits as I see them.

Your apparent 3rd strike for vote spamming suggests otherwise

Please consider curating your feed rather than downvoting content you don't like

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

My feed is perfectly well curated. But I also downvote (and report) a lot of spam, like actual chatgpt-generated ad spam.

(I also downvote "deleted by creator" comments, but that's just to push them down in the comment trees, because they're just noise. They changed the behavior a while back to leave that instead of actually deleting it when it had no replies, and I wish they'd revert that change.)

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 35 points 2 weeks ago

My feed is perfectly well curated.

Total post upvotes: 19
Total post downvotes: 4656

(x) Doubt

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago

chatgpt

crapGPT

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"Vote spamming" is actually the stupidest thing I've ever heard on this platform. Oh no, don't engage in the primary way the platform allows! How horrible!

And you people wonder why lemmy hasn't and will never actually take off?

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Total post upvotes: 19

Looks like lemmy has absolutely nothing of merit for you, why are you even here?

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People aren't under the obligation to upvote posts they like. Personally I don't upvote or downvote a lot of posts either.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not upvoting is 1 thing. Having a 500:1 downvote:upvote ratio is quite another.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eh, I'm not sure it's indicative of votespamming though. That can just be a product of how they use Lemmy.

I didn't accuse him of votespamming, only of being a crappy member of the community.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 week ago

One of the few sensible comments in this shitlib thread