I took this screenshot myself from the government release page.
"At least she didn't have an abortion. That would have been wrong." - MAGA
this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
381 points (99.0% liked)
Just Post
1197 readers
694 users here now
Just post something π
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
This is so deranged sounding that I want to doubt her, but Trump keeps giving me reasons to believe her.
There are cops, staff, friends, family, there has to be hundreds of people who know.
We need more of them to start breaking, but I can understand not wanting to destroy your family and "commit suicide".
Even if he was innocent, he has proven himself to be vindictive and spiteful. Helpful witnesses would be financially destroyed if they disagreed with his narrative in any way.
If I've learned anything from MAGA, it's that no matter how outlandish it first sounds, it ALWAYS turns out to be true, often even worse.
Want to keep someone quiet? Murder a newborn in front of them, dispose of the body, and remind them that they're now part of this, so they'd better shut up. Sounds MAGA to me.
So as crazy as this sounds, it probably means that it is 100% true, and probably happened repeatedly.
Remember when he kept talking about "post-birth abortions"? Yeah, it was projection.
I'm just gonna go ahead and say that I believe this 100% not because I have strong evidence of it but because in the last 10 years Trump has proved that he is deranged enough to do something like before breakfast.
but what about second breakfast?
Elevensies, my favorite.
This could be a reason why Epstein called him evil.
Takes one to know one.
These bastards need the guillotine.
Nah, this is 21st century America. We solve our problems with gunpowder and lead. That way the whole gang gets to join in the fun!
Only you can make that happen, the system is captured for the purpose preventing accountability.
Imagine if he and Epstein were all arrested in like 2010 or something. I imagine weβd have flying cars now.
We've had flying cars for a while now. They're called helicopters.
I don't follow.
Helicopters take a whole set of very specific skills to fly. Some sort of multi-rotor set up could potentially be dumbed down and assisted enough for the general public to operate.
Imagine the most middle of the road (metaphorically not literally) driver you can. Now imagine handing them the keys to a <150mph vehicle with the ability to go vertically. How do you think that will go? And what do you think about handing the keys to not just them, but the other 50% of people that are dumber than this imaginary midwit.
Now try and work out what will happen to your driving insurance, or your house insurance if you live near a road when these imaginary people have flying cars.
The phrase "You can make anything idiot proof, the world will just make a better idiot."
I mean obviously the only way flying cars ever work is if they fly themselves. Even then they're still a terrible idea though and would be super duper not eco friendly.
Cracked.com made a very similar point back when they were good.
https://www.cracked.com/blog/forgotten-history-flying-car-has-been-invented-twice
Absolutely hilarious that it's almost word for word the opening paragraph (and took a NASA contracted aeronautical engineer to turn into a reality, and even they couldn't stop it from crashing)
Never said it was a good idea. For sure never said I intended to participate. I just said it will reach a point of marketable. Being able to fly in the things will be subscription based, based on speed and altitude of flight, all controlled by the network. Only the most expensive models will even have a user control mode that will only work outside of traffic controlled areas. All a terrible idea. All going to be a thing before you or I are comfortable with it.
That's a lot of very confident positing
I rather have a train. And someone to drive it for me.
So an airplane?
Pretty much, but on the ground and much more fuel efficient
Flying trains!
Does MagLev count?
That's the only kind I know.
Does in my book
Great, now I have to look out for asshole drivers falling out of the fucking sky?!?
Like literally. No tariffs with China, and Chinese helicopter car hybrid thingy can launch in the US.
Theyβve been sitting on this for years. They knew and just let the info rot and the pedos were left to keep running the world
I donβt disagree that this shit needs to be addressed, but you do realize that anyone can call the FBI and make claims, and those claims do have to be recorded. Sure, these claims seem on brand, but they are just that. Unsubstantiated claims.
So like, yes, fuck the pedo elite, but donβt start feeling too vindicated when you see something like this, that has no evidentiary weight to it that we know of.
Epstein's niece isn't some rando
is there a document that makes it clear that is the source?
The first case against Epstein was "resolved" under the Bush Admin and the second, where Maxwell received her sentence, was under the Trump admin before being sealed by the courts until late 2023.
I think more importantly is that WE knew. We all knew. "TrafficKing: The Jeffrey Epstein Case" Book by Conchita Sarnoff we published in 2015, we knew all of this and the American public still elected this piece of shit Donald Trump, who we knew was his friend, president.
If we had a functional democracy, then the opposition party would have made Epstein a major figure in the presidential elections.
The Democratic Party had three opportunities - 2016, 2020, 2024 - when they should have been shouting "Epstein" from every podium, instead they brushed it under the rug.
The reality is we didn't "all" know. Ask any random person on the street, they've never heard of TrafficKing or Julie K Brown or even Virginia Giuffre. It is easy to blame individual voters for their ignorance, but it makes much more sense to view this as an institutional failure.
Democratic politicians have this pathological need to be polite to their opponents, even as their opponents are calling them the worst criminals to ever occupy the White House. Instead of answering that charge, or countering with irrefutable FBI evidence of decades of raping children, they just ignore the whole thing, and "take the high road"...to defeat.
Indeed, instead they pretended he wasn't running in four years, and when they did run against him, it was to court Republican voters (the majority of her campaign).
This was in spite of the well-known mathematical fact that an Independent issue must be campaigned on to win an election. Instead, they were "hoping" (officially) Rs would change their mind.
Can't argue with the money they made to do this though, a billion dollars is a new record, especially when she just had a few months. It took Trump FOUR YEARS to raise 900 million or so, she did it in about four months. Amazing, unheard amounts of Super-PAC money made this happen, she did what she was paid to do.
This is all public information, they don't even bother to hide it any longer, it's now LEGAL (because as you know, corporations are people and money is free speech).
This was in spite of the well-known mathematical fact that an Independent issue must be campaigned on to win an election. Instead, they were "hoping" (officially) Rs would change their mind.
I have been an Unafilliated Independent since the day I first registered to vote in 1977. The Independent voting base is larger than either the Democratic or MAGA voting base. Literally EVERY single national political race in America is decided by the Independent voter.
Neither side can count on my vote. They have to earn it, every time.
I'd argue if you had a functioning democracy then the Dems wouldn't have needed to do anything about this, much less need it as a campaign tactic. The criminals would go to jail and probably the conservative party would dissolve.
Yeah, if we want to have a functioning democracy, then we must dissolve the conservative parties that do not respond to the will of the voters.
This would mean dissolving both the Democratic and Republican parties.
Fine by me. Perhaps we should prohibit parties altogether.
sorry, israel comes first
When someone shows you who they are, believe them.
If you're not American you have known for a long time that this is America.
I knew he was going to be implicated for murder in those files, but holy shit
Thatβs just locker room talk
I need eye bleach
I can kind of of not imaging that they would release this. Where exactly could you download it?
That's why I left the whole page as a snip, rather than just the bit about trump.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf