this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2025
399 points (98.5% liked)

Just Post

1200 readers
625 users here now

Just post something ๐Ÿ’›

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I took this screenshot myself from the government release page.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Helicopters take a whole set of very specific skills to fly. Some sort of multi-rotor set up could potentially be dumbed down and assisted enough for the general public to operate.

[โ€“] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, flying is going to be harder than hugging the land

[โ€“] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

All of the gyro assistance, self takeoff and landing in RC multi-rotors and more will be baked into anything that will ever be released to the public. At most they'll let you think you are participating, more likely they'd be totally self flying and people will just be passengers.

[โ€“] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (4 children)

Imagine the most middle of the road (metaphorically not literally) driver you can. Now imagine handing them the keys to a <150mph vehicle with the ability to go vertically. How do you think that will go? And what do you think about handing the keys to not just them, but the other 50% of people that are dumber than this imaginary midwit.

Now try and work out what will happen to your driving insurance, or your house insurance if you live near a road when these imaginary people have flying cars.

The phrase "You can make anything idiot proof, the world will just make a better idiot."

Flying cars are the modern version of flying horses: Mythical beasts that will save us from the drudgery of travel over land

[โ€“] Obi@sopuli.xyz 8 points 20 hours ago

I mean obviously the only way flying cars ever work is if they fly themselves. Even then they're still a terrible idea though and would be super duper not eco friendly.

[โ€“] toynbee@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 hours ago

Absolutely hilarious that it's almost word for word the opening paragraph (and took a NASA contracted aeronautical engineer to turn into a reality, and even they couldn't stop it from crashing)

[โ€“] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Never said it was a good idea. For sure never said I intended to participate. I just said it will reach a point of marketable. Being able to fly in the things will be subscription based, based on speed and altitude of flight, all controlled by the network. Only the most expensive models will even have a user control mode that will only work outside of traffic controlled areas. All a terrible idea. All going to be a thing before you or I are comfortable with it.

[โ€“] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago

That's a lot of very confident positing

[โ€“] 18107@aussie.zone 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I rather have a train. And someone to drive it for me.

[โ€“] lastweakness@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

Pretty much, but on the ground and much more fuel efficient

[โ€“] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)
[โ€“] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 18 hours ago

That's the only kind I know.

[โ€“] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago

Does in my book

[โ€“] tym@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Great, now I have to look out for asshole drivers falling out of the fucking sky?!?