this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
440 points (95.5% liked)

tumblr

5510 readers
151 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
440
Who ever could it be? (piefedimages.s3.eu-central-003.backblazeb2.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to c/tumblr@lemmy.world
 
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LuckingFurker@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 2 weeks ago

"At least" implies he has more than 4 people in his friend group, therefore it could be Michael too

[–] SpacePanda@mander.xyz 49 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Generation Z (born 1997-2006) 23.1%

Millennials (born 1981-1996) 14.2%

Generation X (born 1965-1980) 5.1%

Baby boomers (born 1946-1964) 3.0%

Silent Generation (born 1945 or earlier) 1.8%

https://news.gallup.com/poll/332522/percentage-americans-lgbt.aspx

Personally I think these numbers reflect levels of acceptance amonst generation vs actual % lgbtq+. Real number is probably closer to Gen z stats I would think.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

LOL I don’t think people just suddenly became more gay over the last 80 years. This more likely reflects how people publicly identify and society’s acceptance and perceptions.

I’d bet the distribution across the spectrum has been roughly the same since humans had the concept of such social constructs.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

These damn computers are turning gen z gay

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's the hormones in the water

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I like how people pretend that lots of kids aren't using it as a means to profile themselves socially without actually being queer, because it's the hip in-group thing to do.

I have a nephew who came out as trans a couple of years ago. Literally nothing changed, looks the same, acts the same, dresses the same, behaves the same, only changed his name and gender randomly one day. And everyone has to accept that because not to do so would be a horrific crime against humanity for some reason.

As if kids don't make up dumb shit about themselves for attention, out of peer pressure, to fit in, as a fashion statement, to use as a shield to hide behind, to use as a moral superiority mechanism and berate others who don't unconditionally accept whatever they say, or as a means to get sympathy.

The discourse is pretty ridiculous. Is trans a real thing? Absolutely. Is "queer" a social movement that is subject to the same social psychological dynamics as literally all other cultural norms? Absolutely.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The reason the discourse is so scuffed is because pro-trans advocates have had to dig their heels in so much because of the fact there are plenty of anti-trans advocates who would happily lynch trans people. It's basically don't give an inch or they'll take a mile shit, which shouldn't be a thing but they aren't wrong either.

As for teens doing that, eh worst case scenario they waste some time and effort resulting in something to embarrass them with in a couple years. Better to get the data and figure out why rather than skipping forward 20 years and realizing that's why they were so miserable.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

Absolutely agreed on all points. Glad to see the reaction wasn't knee-jerking calling me transphobic, because I'm anything but.

[–] SpacePanda@mander.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm sure there are some that do this. Thats why I say I think the 25% is probably the accurate statistic. Kids will be kids and people are programmed to be social and do what needs to be done to fit in socially or they will be ostrosized from the village/pack. On the other hand I'm sure there are also plenty of people who will identity as cis. For similar social reasons or personal ones.

Edit: wanted to add I think in second sentence

Also like to add I feel @vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works is probably right

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

Not just acceptance but also expanding definitions probably. That + has taken on a lot more meanings in the last few decades. A lot of people who didn't think they fit in a narrow definition before now have more options to allow self-determination.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Unfortunately not just levels of acceptance I'd wager. But survival rates.

[–] tensorpudding@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

Many who died from AIDS, for instance.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think you're downplaying the importance of formative years to an individual's sexual identity by quite a lot.

[–] tomiant@piefed.social -2 points 2 weeks ago

I think a lot of that is made up from people who are queer as a fashion statement in lieu of possessing an actual personality, but that is anathema for the discourse so let's not talk about it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Or maybe he's just confident in his own sexuality and "cute" was the best way he could say effeminate or anything else he meant...

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago

or c/thishappened...

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The actual number is about 7% of the population.

[–] tensorpudding@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If each friend in a group of four had an independent and identical 25% chance of being gay, the probability that at least two of them are gay is about 26%, I like those odds.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

are you sure it’s 26%? i’m arriving at around 57%, but maybe there’s a flaw in my reasoning

[–] tensorpudding@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Its possible I made an error, I used 1 minus the cdf of the binomial distribution with n = 4 and p = 0.25 evaluated at 1, calculated from https://binomialdistributioncalculator.com/binomial-cdf-calculator/

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago

huh. i did the same thing, but by hand…

oh wait no i see my mistake. you’re right, it’s about 26%. my bad 😅

[–] MissingInteger@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

@tensorpudding@lemmy.world is correct:

P(at least 2 gay) = 1 - P(0 gay) - P(exactly 1 gay)
= 1 - 0.75^4 - 4×0.25×0.75^3
= 1 - 0.31640625 - 0.421875
= 0.26171875
≈ 26%
[–] atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

according to a recently done survey, over 94% of people are trans

that probably affects things, but its too late for me to determine how

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

It rose to 96% just this morning!