this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
560 points (99.5% liked)

politics

31231 readers
2109 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 268 points 9 months ago (4 children)

The judge literally ordered that political consequences were not an excuse for redactions. I hope he starts putting people in jail

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 126 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He will do nothing! ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! The judges in the Untied States are like the parents who say they're going to count to three, and the Trump administration are the kids who have figured out that nothing happens when they get to three.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 28 points 9 months ago (2 children)

At the end of the day, the folks who actually enforce rulings are beholden to Trump and his cronies, so they kind of can’t enforce shit

[–] Philippe23@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago

Judges can deputize people to carry out their rulings if need be. So that's not strictly true.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 78 points 9 months ago

That would be a first. I'm not holding my breath.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 42 points 9 months ago

What's this, another court order shamelessly ignored? Fourth box.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 24 points 9 months ago

They were also supposed to release all the files and not some of them, yet here we are.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 223 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Politically exposed individuals.

Here's the question, why are they in the files doing something that merits redacting them?

Call it what it is. You aren't "redacting the names of politically exposed individuals". You are "protecting the reputations of politically-aligned pedophiles".

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 83 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's even exactly the opposite of what the term says.

Keeping the those politicians secret means they remain politically exposed to extortion by any person or government that knows that secret, to the detriment of US national security. Revealing those secrets eliminates any leverage for bad actors.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 17 points 9 months ago

Revealing that secret means the people can't be extorted anymore. There's a narrow window when they can speak freely before....

Well....do you remember The Red Wedding episode of Game of Thrones? Sort of like that, but defenestrations.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 141 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Did anyone really expect them to release documents that implicated republicans or their puppeteers? These assholes are blatantly corrupt. As long as they are the gatekeepers, nothing can be trusted.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Its not blatant enough or a third of America wouldnt still support him.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

A third watches no news except FOX, if that. They don't see or care what happens as long as its not obvious and against them.

[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 63 points 9 months ago

This is bullshit.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 59 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They were never, ever going to release the files with Trump in them or anyone Trump adjacent.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago

At least we know without a shadow of a doubt the dumb pedophile rapist piece of shit is unmistakably in those files... this completely seals the deal. Legally nothing will be done but, yeah.. the childfucking piece of shit is DEFINITELY in those files. For sure. No doubt. Undoubtedly. No contest. The President of the United States of America is a disgusting pedophile rapist piece of shit.

Just look at him... ugh! [shudder]

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 36 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is such a crazy timeline. Everyone knows our president is an ephebophile (pedo into teens). He has flat out stated it. No one is unaware of this fact anymore.

And yet we live in a system where good people are being deported or tortured in prison camps. We can't have government that actually works because our laws are so fucked up that good people get hurt while we all know a pedo rapist is running the country.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's time we realize as a species that this world is ran by pure evil. We need to begin responding differently. I don't know what that means, but even after a revolution there are still charismatic psychos that come along and fuck shit up again. People are just too dumb and fall for it over and over and over. How many times does this process need to be repeated before we evolve as a species?

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It is that damn moral highground the left wants to stick to. They will shoot themselves in the foot over and over and while bleeding out ask "what could we have done?"

There no longer is a slippery slope. Outlaw the shit republicans do and lock them the hell up. Cuz you know what, they are tryinging their hardest to do the same.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Obviously that is the correct step in the interim. But how do we prevent this repeating over and over?

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

honestly i don't know if humans can.

when you look at stories of (semi)utopian societies there is this drive in nearly all people to be good to a fault. people want to work and learn and do things for the betterment of society. real humans will find a way to be shitty no matter how good they are.

i think the only way to get things to work is to define a good but rigid stance on all thing shitty. shame the fuck out of stupid religous and political views. anti science and anti facts should cause your voice to be silenced. this wave of stupidity and hate needs to be treated like cancer.

[–] LittleBorat3@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Heads need to roll over and over again

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He is into 13 year olds. 13 year olds are not 'teens'. Yes, I know how 13 is pronounced. He's still a pedo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 9 months ago

Surprising no one.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] dumbass@piefed.social 23 points 9 months ago

Add it the pile.

[–] g0nz0li0@piefed.social 33 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Motherfucker Trump. He’s so obviously implicated and covering. The very thing all those Magat’s claim to fight against: he’s that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkeyDumpster@lemmy.org 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

is the DOJ acting on the names they've redacted? like, are these people going to jail?

[–] lemmyausmister@feddit.org 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Headline meant republicans

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 months ago

No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 19 points 9 months ago

Surprised Pikachu!

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Republican child rapists

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think I love Trump and his government purely because they are so blatant at corruption, they expose all of those before them and will surely make everyone question those that follow.

If not.. Then I guess that's it.

If there is an option for Americans to disrupt the republican - democrat party swap, then please, please disrupt the hell out of it in the next election.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

This is a big surprise. I'm sure it was a mistake and they meant to redact something damaging in a different document.

/s

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Applesause@mander.xyz 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 9 months ago

Well, not THAT shocked..

[–] ItsMeForRealNow@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

People in politics SHPULD BE FUCKING EXPOSED because it's about GOVT POLICY that affects EVERYONE. NOBODY IN POLITICS SHOULD BE HIDDEN.

[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 9 months ago

Gotta redact appropriately:

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No they didn’t. They redacted the names of Trump, his allies, and people who bribed him.

The media needs to say what’s actually going on, not just feed us bullshit Trump says.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Ain't no-one more politically exposed than one Donald J Trump.
So, probably, and as far as we know,
Ain't no-one more redacted in the Epstein Files than that Donald J Trump.

I'd put the word president in front of his surname, but he's not worthy of the honour, and he's not worthy of the presidency.

I didn't think there was anyone in the world who could make George W Bush look statesmanlike, well-informed, wise, responsible and honest. I was wrong.

[–] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

The whole point of releasing these files is to make them politically exposed. It's literally the exact thing we want.

Hopefully their windows are exposed, too.

load more comments
view more: next ›