this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
274 points (100.0% liked)

News

34103 readers
3004 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The BBC has vowed to defend itself against the $10bn lawsuit that the US president, Donald Trump filed against it.

In a complaint filed on Monday evening, Trump sought $5bn in damages each on two counts, alleging that the BBC defamed him, and that it violated Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

Trump alleged the broadcaster “intentionally, maliciously and deceptively” edited the 6 January speech he gave before the attack on the US Capitol.

The BBC has previously acknowledged the editing was an “error of judgment” and apologised to Trump, but insisted there was no legal basis for a defamation claim. Tim Davie, the BBC’s director general, and Deborah Turness, the head of BBC News, resigned over the controversy last month.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uss_entrepreneur@startrek.website 56 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How does jurisdiction work here? The piece never aired in the US, bbc is based in Britain, yet he’s filing in Florida?

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Trump is a resident of Florida, and the BBC does business in Florida via the website, BBCNews, Britbox licensing, etc. The complaint even talks about gray-market VPN viewing of iPlayer. Jurisdiction isn't really the issue. Establishing any actual harm at all will be the issue, to say nothing of "billions" of dollars worth of it from some splicing that is honestly editorial shading at worst. He is super pissed off in that speech, issues way more shaded threats than calls to peaceful actions, and pardoned the people who killed or injured multiple Capitol Police. Proving that the 10 or twenty people in Florida who actually saw the thing is worth anything to a plaintiff who won the fucking election is going to be an incredibly tall order for any half-way conscientious judge or jury.

It's typical Trump "lawfare," complete with breathless nonsense adjectives in the complaint to make the diaper baby anger-happy when he reads it. Only the sheer awfulness and expense of American litigation makes it even conceivable that the BBC will eventually settle, and if they do it will probably be right before discovery after they exhaust any motions to dismiss and other procedural tactics.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly the beeb should just go “ok fuck you” and stop doing any business in Florida.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Most comanies of the world should say that and stop doing business in the whole of the united state of fascism until the orange child rapist dies.
Or it learns to stop being such a massive cunt, but, let's face it, there's no chance of that happening. So it's back to dying, which I hope will be excruciating.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Wasn't it $5b just an hour ago?

[–] bajabound@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a rapidly evolving matter. And $5b just doesn't go as far as it did an hour ago.

[–] meejle@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Three dozen eggs, or 4GB of RAM.

[–] bajabound@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Now you're talking about big boy money the small billionaires just don't have.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago

How much could eggs cost, Michael? $10 billion?

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

5 billion per case.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

$5bn in damages each on two counts,

5x2

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Hey man, I work construction and only know 2x4

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Sure they will!
No way will they capitulate!
.
.
.
. /s

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 21 points 4 weeks ago

At least they don’t have a merger they’re trying to get through, also giving away tax payer dollars is much harder than a corpo just bending the knee.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't think they have a choice. Where they're not a commercial organisation they be seen to back down and settle out of court. The public and political backlash would be way to great.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Let's start with "go fuck yourself, orange fascist".

[–] aarRJaay@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How much of the licence fee is going to go on this crap? Just ignore him and he'll go away

[–] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He never paid their license fee so his lawsuit will be dismissed :)

[–] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 14 points 3 weeks ago

"So, Mr Trump, how did you watch it, if you never paid the licence fee?.. Did you perhaps... commit TV Licence Fraud!?!"

Straight to jail. Finally, we got him on something he can't squirm or lie his way out of.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think everyone in America should sue trump for 20 billion for violating our constitutional rights and for pain and suffering of watching him do crimes every day

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 3 weeks ago

Legally speaking? Mountains of evidence, too!

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

"de-fend"? Duhfend... Difond?

Sorry everyone, I'm American, and I dont understand this word with relation to Trump attacking them.

Did they mean "Depends", the adult diaper brand Trump uses?