this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
512 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

17894 readers
2836 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] azi@mander.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

Uh yeah because it's a movie. They couldn't pass up on casting Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy as Bob and Emily Cratchet (what with Miss Piggy's sheer talent and star power) which left them in a bit of a casting bind. Realistically they had to cast pigs and frogs as the Cratchet children instead of searching high and low for talented half-pig half-frog child actors. Even then they went out of their way in casting Kermit's actual nephew Robin the Frog as Tiny Tim and the other child actors (Peter, Miranda, and Melinda) pretty closely resembled their 'parents'.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 81 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Which only mean they aren't a frog nor a pig, they're an entirely new species where the male have a frog-like form and female have a pig-like form.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago

A form of sexual dimorphism. Honestly compared to real examples like the angler fish it's not even that weird.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Maybe it's a form of xenoparity like Messor ibericus, where one species is giving birth to an entirely separate species alongside its own.

[–] jimmux@programming.dev 14 points 1 week ago

I never heard of xenoparity before, this is fascinating.

Supposedly it only evolved about 5 million years ago, and some colonies still rely on external populations? Nature is constantly finding new ways to undermine our attempts to think we know how shit works.

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago
[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

First, thank you for pointing this out. I had to go and fill my brain hole with a bunch of information about this absolutely fascinating discovery. I really thought you were discussing some science fiction concept initially.

Second, what in the actual fuck did I just read?!?

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

We could call them sometime like puppets or Muppets

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 60 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

First off, Hank Green, it's The Muppet Christmas Carol. Second, it is the best film version of A Christmas Carol hands down. I will die on this hill. Finally, we pretty much kicked any scientific accuracy to the curb, starting with pretending that Gonzo is Charles Dickens.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Got the most actual quoted lines from the book of any film version, plus you've got all of Dicken's direct-to-reader moralising delivered by Gonzo. And as well as being very faithful to the book, it is a superb film as well.

Michael Caine excels as Scrooge, too. I wouldn't say that he was better than Alastair Sim was in his version - that's a performance that would take some beating - but there's not much in it.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Got the most actual quoted lines from the book of any film version…

I think you forgot about the Patrick Stewart version.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Christmas_Carol_(1999_film)

This is my favorite without muppets. Which means it’s my second favorite.

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

and like also frogs totally cant speak

[–] Klear@quokk.au 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have to lick them first.

[–] halvar@lemy.lol 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the comment i made my own comment for

[–] Klear@quokk.au 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] halvar@lemy.lol 5 points 1 week ago

aww thank you

[–] GheeButtersnaps@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I prefer my Dickens to be as dour and melancholy as possible. Which is why I've always liked the George C. Scott version the best myself. Other than sound volume issues with the blaring horns of doom I think it's great. But that's just me.

[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

May be they couldn't have kids because, i don't know, being entirely different species, so they adopted.

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's like how in the Shrek universe, dragons and donkeys are the same species.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 9 points 1 week ago

Nope, all the dragon children are sterile cross species offspring like mules.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

That’s better than those demon dragon-donkey hybrids from Shrek.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Sometimes this happens with dogs though doesn’t it. Maybe they just took it to the extreme for puppets

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Of course it's Hank Green who would question it lol. But you're not the only one!