this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
614 points (97.8% liked)

politics

31333 readers
2472 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 81 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's hard to tax income if there's no reported income

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unrealized gains tax. Lets fucking go.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Rewrite the laws that if it's collateral, it's realized.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Tax the loans based on collateral as income and you don't even need to figure out the value of the collateral.

[–] undercrust@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 years ago

Here we go; this guy gets it.

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then everyone taking out a home equity loan suddenly has to pay the taxes as if they sold their house.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

Ok so make it that equity in a primary residence is exempt.

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 29 points 2 years ago

I just get loans on untaxed offshore collateral and write it off as a business expense like everyone else, don't you?

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago

But that's not what the sign on the side of the road says...skeptical.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 years ago (4 children)

But then what will trickle down???

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm kinda thinking we maybe try trickle-up for a few years.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We are the workers and the consumers. We are the ones who trickle down.

[–] Longing@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I am the one who trickles.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

We already have that. It’s called political donations.

[–] barnaclebutt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Unfortunately, the urine based system where richer people pee wealth on less rich people who then pee on poorer people and so on isn't sound economic theory. Call me surprised, and soaked in freedom pee.

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The data is in. Trickle down doesn’t work.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

(I was being facetious)

[–] rickdg@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 years ago

Poor people: “Unacceptable!”

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 20 points 2 years ago

But one day I might be in the 1%! And when I am, I'll show people like ME a thing or two.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Problem is a solid 30% of those that vote see themselves potentially attaining that ~~99%~~ 1%, as baffling as that is.

Edit

[–] Mayonnaise@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

I do, yikes, thank you

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Strangely enough, most people will be in the top 5% at some point in their life. But just for a year, when they sell their house. So you're getting fucked 75 years of your life for maybe 1 year of benefit?

[–] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

More like you busted your ass for 75 years then got fucked when you had to sell your house.

[–] FerNZA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I am not from the US so might be wrong, but I think it works the same as in mine. It is because they tax income not wealth (which would be difficult I guess). Elon can probably live on $0 income very comfortably by his standard. More than 1% of income earners will be affected at some point as you age up, inheritance etc. Maybe not 30%

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Well hell, sign me up!