this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
181 points (100.0% liked)

News

33313 readers
1903 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a scene reminiscent of the film “Groundhog Day,” the U.S. Navy has canceled the Constellation-class frigate program, with only the first two ships, which are already under construction, scheduled for completion.

The program was terminated due to production delays, escalating costs, and design challenges stemming from adapting a foreign design to meet U.S. requirements. The funds from the canceled frigates will be reallocated to other ships that can be produced more quickly.

The Constellation-class frigate program was intended to be a “low-risk” approach, basically a slam-dunk to building a new frigate, but it underwent significant changes to its Italian FREMM-based design, making it heavier, more expensive, and less aligned with its original blueprints.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If they built the amphibious assault ships to look like this, then they could fill them with Cybertrucks and anytime the US invaded a country it would be horrific and comical at the same time.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 2 hours ago

Now playing in Venezuela: "The Bay of Cyberpigs".

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe they could use the boat materials to build some sort of arch. A triumphant arch.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

This is such an incredibly dumb decision. This was going to be the direction the navy went in - more vessels that are capable in aggregate, but no single one as too big of a target. Datalink handoff. Sensor fusion.

But they’re probably gonna make a new class of battleship or something idiotically obsolete like that.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

They'll start down that path, spend billions on starting up the program, then a new president comes in and cancels that to return to the smaller ship philosophy and spends billions to start down that path again.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Sure, you know everyone's favorite ship, the aircraft carrier, well wait till you meet the drone carrier! It's just as big for some reason, but it mostly carries drones and guided missiles and it probably sails alongside a traditional carrier, because it can't actually perform all of the same duties. This is how we'll be able to spend more than ever before.

[–] zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago

Sounds like may every engineering project I've worked on.

[–] nebajoth@piefed.ca 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I do wonder what the advent of drone warfare, including the marine drones used in the black sea against Russia, and the Taiwanese investment in drones for defense against China, has done to impact the outlook and priorities of the US Navy. It may very well be that it has changed the assessment of whether to purchase large expensive ships.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

don't worry, they'll spend that $ somewhere for sure

[–] nebajoth@piefed.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

Oh I'm not worried about that. I'm sure they will find more modern ways to murder.

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 5 points 9 hours ago

Good. Hope they stop building death ships all together and are forced to have bake sales for more.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 14 hours ago

I'm pretty sure that's just the inevitable consequence of decades of under-regulated capitalism and cronyism letting the arms dealers set their own prices and conditions.

Personally, I consider the most bloated military in the history of the world not being able to expand or even replace its flotilla a huge win though, regardless of the reasons 🤷

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 31 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Reminds me of those littoral combat ships that were built in Alabama and were garbage quality — loads of problems and can’t even defend themselves. Navy tried to stop spending on them but Congressman Bradley Byrne from Alabama keeps forcing it in to the budget.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yep, eerily similar. It's not even clear what these ships are supposed to do well.

[–] pentastarm@piefed.ca 34 points 17 hours ago

Nah, Kegseth just needed more booze money.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Export more manufacturing industries

[–] commander@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

Let's see if the coast guard is happy with the new patrol ship once one of those are finished. If the coast guard fails too, pretty entertaining incompetence