this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2025
555 points (92.6% liked)

Science Memes

17443 readers
3335 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 0 points 14 minutes ago

I don't get why these kind of post crop up so often.

The answer to them doesn't matter and these aren't really math questions, because there is no context given. This is just endless discussions about different people having different assumptions on notation used there...

In real math, where the numbers mean something, good and consistent notation is important, but not necessary, because the order of operations or what those operations are exactly would be clear through the context of these formulas. Good notation just makes it easier to spot errors, work with formulas or to avoid confusion.

Here is what I would assume this formula could mean. Someone has 2 apples and 5 bags of apples that initially came with 8 apples each inside, but someone else ate 5 apples from each of these bags.

With this context it is pretty clear what the answer would be.

Any PEMDAS enjoyers in chat?

[–] ViperActual@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago

2+5(8-5)

For anyone wanting to see a different way of solving it with distribution:

2+58-55 2+40-25 42-25 17

So long as you follow the basic math rules, you can solve it in many different ways to get the same result.

[–] MattW03@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Let's keep it easy. There's 2 + all the other number who results in 15 = 17.

Someone may mistake by doing 2+5 then the rest of the operation, resulting in 21. But is wrong.

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (9 children)
(* (+ 2 5) (- 8 5))

Hope some LISP can clear this up

Edit:

( + 2 ( * 5 ( - 8 5 ) ) )
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

So, if 2 5 8 5 - × + is "RPN" does that mean that the LISP version is Polish Notation?

[–] yboutros@infosec.pub 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is this a meme? Shouldn't it be

( + 2 ( * 5 ( - 8 5 ) ) )
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›