this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
24 points (76.1% liked)

Space

1927 readers
128 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Seems misleading. They didn't have moss growing outside the station, they had spores in an "exposure" box out there for 9 months, then sent them to earth and were able to grow moss from the spores.

[–] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

thanks for clarifying, that's a huge distinction vs. moss actually growing as implied by their phrasing and the image.

still cool that the spores survived, but much less remarkable.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, I agree. The reality is very interesting, so it sucks that they made it sound so much more significant.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world -2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I think the image of the ISS completely covered in moss growing in the vacuum of space conveyed that point well enough, you might be reading to much into it.

didn't we just do moss and with a less clickbait title