this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
24 points (76.1% liked)

Space

1929 readers
116 users here now

A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive. This means no harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  2. Engage in constructive discussions by discussing in good faith.
  3. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics

Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Seems misleading. They didn't have moss growing outside the station, they had spores in an "exposure" box out there for 9 months, then sent them to earth and were able to grow moss from the spores.

[–] GreenCrunch@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

thanks for clarifying, that's a huge distinction vs. moss actually growing as implied by their phrasing and the image.

still cool that the spores survived, but much less remarkable.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, I agree. The reality is very interesting, so it sucks that they made it sound so much more significant.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think the image of the ISS completely covered in moss growing in the vacuum of space conveyed that point well enough, you might be reading to much into it.