this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2025
682 points (99.4% liked)

Flippanarchy

1781 readers
144 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules

  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.

Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
682
YSK this is Jared Birchall. He is the right-hand man of Elon Musk. He also manages Musk's wealth. Jared lives in Austin, Texas. He HATES when people see his face. (assets.bwbx.io)
submitted 2 days ago by Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Re-posted since LW removed it...

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.org/post/2610169

Jared Birchall is Elon Musk's right hand man. He controls Elon Musk's family foundation and is in charge of hiring bodyguards to protect Elon. He is one of the very few people that Elon Musk trusts.

With his wife Laura, he lives in Austin, Texas.

According to public documents, they are located at 16715, Destiny Cove, Austin, TX 78738-7421.

[Original image of family removed]

Donald Trump falsely said migrant families living in Springfield, Ohio, were stealing pets and eating cats and dogs.

Elon Musk amplified these lies on X.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/media/elon-musk-trump-rally-bomb-election-misinformation

As a result, these families received thousands death threats.

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/19/nx-s1-5114047/springfield-ohio-haitian-migrants-trump-safety-concerns

Jared Birchall laughed about it. He absolutely loved it. His lovely wife Laura Birchall thought this was very funny.

Jared is obsessed about his privacy. He doesn't want anyone to know who he is.

"Why are you posting their picture?"

Free speech absolutism baby.

I don't owe them shit.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arnitbier@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fucking love this new shit.

They really shouldnt scrutinize if they don't want to be scrutinized

They didn't and don't obey the spirit of law, or worry about how what they do effects others, other peoples feelings, or even obey the actual fucking law itself if they don't think they have to

So I dont believe that overthinking these things is necessary when considering what to do about the people themselves or the problems that are created as a result.

This isn't to say don't obey the law but is def to say not to worry about how it might appear to some instead of how it actually is

Resisting within the confines of the system when you can makes good sense, and this is that in fucking SPADES duder

Bravo whoever you are, and thank you

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They make every device we own spy on us in our own homes but don't want us to know anything about their life. Fuck these psychopaths asshats.

[–] stopforgettingit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

If I remember correctly I think I read he also manages all of Musks baby mamas. He hands out the funds and enforces the ndas

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The man who knows where the bodies are buried.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I will always maintain that assassinating well-known or infamous figureheads is a worthless strategem. At best, it's merely symbolic, at worst it's likely to backfire spectacularly - and it achieves very little in reality because you're not actually doing any structural damage to the hierarchy involved.

Their right-hand henchmen, the people these figureheads rely on to get anything done and usually remain hidden in the shadows, on the other hand...

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In theory you are right yet history has shown dramatic political progress after assassinations.

UnitedHealthcare immediately changed their policies after the assassination.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yet history has shown dramatic political progress after assassinations.

History shows that poorly-thought out assassination attempts backfire far more than they succeed at achieving anything good. I can point at assassinations like Dmitri Tsafendas (an anarchist) stabbing Hendrik Verwoerd as an attempt that achieved absolutely nothing, and at Alexander Berkman (another anarchist) shooting Henry Clay Frick as an attempt that backfired disasterously on anarchists at the time.

Brian Thompson's assassination should be an important case study for radicals when it comes to the use of targeted lethal force. For one, Thompson was an unknown - not a well-known personality like (for instance) Charlie Kirk. Second, Mangione's motives was not overtly political - a very important factor in his subsequent lionisation. This is why Thompson's demise could not be used as political theatre by liberals and fascists in the way that they used Kirk's.

(I am aware that Kirk wasn't assassinated by a leftist, but that's neither here nor there when it comes to this question)

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you mean by "not overtly political"? I feel like I disagree with you on that point, but I suspect that might be because I'm not understanding your meaning here

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you mean by “not overtly political”?

Mangione's grievance with Big Healthcare was seen as personal - ie, he didn't make any attempt to justify it with an overtly political narrative that could only be seen as abstract by the general public.

Leftists forget that the general public does not conflate the personal with the political. That is why the general public lionised Luigi Mangione and completely ignored Aaron Bushnell.

It is not a trivial thing, unfortunately.

[–] fl1p@piefed.zip 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

R.I.P. Aaron Bushnell, Free Palestine

[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

What policies?

[–] toynbee@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He looks like a straight-up hitman.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

He looks like a real life Terminator; no offense meant towards Robert Patrick, who is the exact opposite of that prick.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck 'em. They wanna spy on everyone else.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah there's no obligation to decorum or fair play here. I think maybe its mate's image would also be a perfectly fair perfectly lovely thing to post.

I'm not too upset about including its spawn, but I get the argument for cropping them out.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 5 points 2 days ago

I'm not at all upset, the same courtesy is not extended to us. Fuck 'em. Its about time we start getting dirty or die. Mother Nature ain't gonna wait around too much longer before she cans this run and starts again.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that dude looks like a movie villain.

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

He does have a little Ray Liotta look to him.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Re-posted since LW removed it…

Any idea why?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My impression is lemmy-world is pretty conservative. Not in a maga-hat "kill the queers" way, but in the "respectable" "don't rock the boat even if people are drowning" kind of way.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 10 hours ago

I have the exact opposite impression. Perhaps it only matters how the mods are aligned though

[–] masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago

My impression is lemmy-world is pretty conservative.

Ie, liberal.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 2 days ago

I would guess that it was for “doxxing” even though every bit of information provided is public record.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't you dare post public info about the people who actively want to kill you and your family! That makes you as bad as the rich assholes who would kill you themselves if they could.

That's why. .world protects fascists.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I actually hope it's just that. Remember that powerful people who try to hide their identities, will wield their power. Let's hope we don't become a target.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago

They're doing a bad job hiding it when it's public info you can find on google in a few seconds. But we won't, they're too busy being fascist dickwads to care about us.

[–] nimble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They have rules against doxxing and also against anything illegal in NL iirc. Inciting violence is illegal there so people saying he should get killed is a no go there (which is what happened in the comments).

Was a whole big thing after united health's CEO was killed. You couldn't say he deserved it or anything. Within a day or two they clarified that you could comment on things that already occurred (like united health ceo) but you couldn't say stuff like so-and-so should be next.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Inciting violence is illegal there so people saying he should get killed is a no go

When the Right incites violence against the Left, LW amplifies the message because it's "news". When a Left user does it LW deletes it.

[–] Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (28 children)

Could be considered doxxing though there is no specific call to harass.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Does he hate it because of privacy reasons or because he has a butt where his chin should be?

[–] oftenawake@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Whatever it is, every single hair follicle on his head is pointing away from it. Could be signs there is a butthole nestled between the cheeks?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He looks like the evil corpo twin of James Marsters

[–] man_wtfhappenedtoyou@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I know who that is! And yeah, wow you're right.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Ancestry seems to have some very promising hints for additional information. It seems to be an uncommon name.

load more comments
view more: next ›