Re-posted since LW removed it...
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.org/post/2610169
Jared Birchall is Elon Musk's right hand man. He controls Elon Musk's family foundation and is in charge of hiring bodyguards to protect Elon. He is one of the very few people that Elon Musk trusts.
With his wife Laura, he lives in Austin, Texas.
According to public documents, they are located at 16715, Destiny Cove, Austin, TX 78738-7421.
[Original image of family removed]
Donald Trump falsely said migrant families living in Springfield, Ohio, were stealing pets and eating cats and dogs.
Elon Musk amplified these lies on X.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/18/media/elon-musk-trump-rally-bomb-election-misinformation
As a result, these families received thousands death threats.
https://www.npr.org/2024/09/19/nx-s1-5114047/springfield-ohio-haitian-migrants-trump-safety-concerns
Jared Birchall laughed about it. He absolutely loved it. His lovely wife Laura Birchall thought this was very funny.
Jared is obsessed about his privacy. He doesn't want anyone to know who he is.
"Why are you posting their picture?"
I don't owe them shit.
Any idea why?
My impression is lemmy-world is pretty conservative. Not in a maga-hat "kill the queers" way, but in the "respectable" "don't rock the boat even if people are drowning" kind of way.
I have the exact opposite impression. Perhaps it only matters how the mods are aligned though
Ie, liberal.
I would guess that it was for “doxxing” even though every bit of information provided is public record.
That's why. .world protects fascists.
I actually hope it's just that. Remember that powerful people who try to hide their identities, will wield their power. Let's hope we don't become a target.
They're doing a bad job hiding it when it's public info you can find on google in a few seconds. But we won't, they're too busy being fascist dickwads to care about us.
They have rules against doxxing and also against anything illegal in NL iirc. Inciting violence is illegal there so people saying he should get killed is a no go there (which is what happened in the comments).
Was a whole big thing after united health's CEO was killed. You couldn't say he deserved it or anything. Within a day or two they clarified that you could comment on things that already occurred (like united health ceo) but you couldn't say stuff like so-and-so should be next.
When the Right incites violence against the Left, LW amplifies the message because it's "news". When a Left user does it LW deletes it.
Could be considered doxxing though there is no specific call to harass.
It absolutely couldnt and no sane legal scholar would say otherwise.
What is Stochastic Terrorism, Trebek
That being said, I have no issues with this.
Its not stochastic terrorism. Were not calling him a pedophile or a vampire. Nobody's calling for him to be killed. We're just Annoying him with our eyes.
Fox news has done worse literally every single day since 2008, and the fcc, back when that existed, never gave a single fuck.
So you did a stochastic terrorism on me? Cool.
Yes, this comment is also stochastic terrorism.
You just used calling people pedophiles as an example and you did that to me two comments up so....
Seems like your logic is off a bit.
I didn't post or suggest anyone should post information about you. You seem like you're just looking for excuses to be angry. What's it like to be so undisturbed by The Horrors that you need to go looking for bullshit excuses to do that?
Are you already misremembering and rewriting the story to make yourself seem better? Another great example.
It started when I said op could technically be doxxing, you disagreed without any reasoning behind it, and I replied with the legal definition saying why it probably was even though it didn't have a "call to intent". Then you attacked me personally because you didn't like being wrong.
It's in the thread and easily provable... no idea why you're now claiming that I said you doxxed me.
Because I happen to know you're a member of the Illuminati, and I'm trying to make you reveal your secrets!
Posting a person's address, picture, full name, and a list of personal faults that is supported by evidence which would likely cause people to reach out and contact the person over their actions.
Doxxing is "posting private or identifying information about an individual without the person's consent, usually with malicious intent".
So yeah, without the intent but it could be considered doxxing.
Unless you have some actual evidence or a counter argument to make instead of "nuh uh"?
I just think it's important for folks to know they have a fascist living in their community, similar to how a pedophile register works. For the record, I don't wish any physical harm to come to him. I just think its important to expose and keep an eye on fascists who do wish harm on whole swathes of society. Much as fascists don't give a damn about the privacy of regular citizens who might oppose their plans (e.g. ICE using Flock cameras for domestic surveillance, or basically anything the NSA does), I don't see why rich fascists should get special consideration wrt their privacy, especially when it comes to publicly available info like court records.
Oh I don't disagree, I just didn't want you to get deleted over doxxing. That's why I made the comment, and if you notice in no part was it against the action or critical of being open about these shits who abuse our systems.
Only that you're a pedophile terrorist who's here illegally, and therefore I needn't justify anything.
I don't know where you are, and I'm only like 90% sure where I am right now, but you totally are.
Wow, you're a piece of work.
It was a satirical take on what people like Trump and Birchall freely accuse "illegal" immigrants of being/doing, to justify their imprisonment and deportation.
Doesn't make the statement untrue.
Any evidence to support that or are you just as bad as the racist rapist in chief?
I meant about me being a piece of work, but no; I try not to leave too too much evidence.
I mean, you did just do personal attacks with no evidence because you didn't like being wrong....
So it seems you're already well within that wheelhouse
You're arguing with me agreeing with you, now?
You agreed you're a piece of work but not that you're literally copying racist rapists abusive strategies despite the evidence above, so you only partially agreed....
And yeah, I'm going for the full agreement when people act like that.
You use that same string of words a lot, like you're copying it from somewhere. Who are you really? What's your goal here?
Well we dont agree on everything, and I suppose common ground just isn't enough for some people. Assholes like you and your inability to compromise is why even the noncommercial internet is such a disaster for everyone's mental health. You should be ashamed of yourself.
You don't get to sling the first shot unprovoked and then get mad when the other party doesn't accept your version.
And sure it's me, not the person roaming the various posts insulting other users and being hateful, that is harming people's mental health. Do you even read what you write?
Where was the /s?
Most folks don't need it?
Oh OK, how do you know they were sarcastic since it's currently 1-1 on how it was interpreted?
Or is that just a justification because they're emphatically supporting you?
Edit: seems like it's 2-3 in my favor so maybe more people need that than you think?
It's a personal attack that was unwarranted and which should be deleted and banned if the community rules were being followed.
It in no way feels satirical considering that there was no provocation for it aside from me responding with evidence as to why it might appear as doxxing.
Y'all could have just said "and we're ok with that considering they use those strategies regularly" since that would be justification and not a personal attack.