this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
149 points (98.1% liked)

Games

43464 readers
868 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago

Just play OpenRA instead of Red Alert (or one of it's mods like Combined Arms)

[–] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

The games :

  • Red Alert 2
  • Half Life 2: Deathmatch
  • Quake 3
  • Unreal Tournament
  • Quake 2
  • Doom
  • Transport Tycoon

No Microsoft Ants, though. :(

[–] ToxicWaste@lemmy.cafe 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] kindred@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's just not the same, even if they both have "ant" in the name.

SimAnt is a sim where you writhe in burning agony while the spider's deadly venom flows through your body.

Microsoft Ants was a sweaty online PvP RTS for six year olds two years before StarCraft.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 46 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Ah yes, my favorite DOS games, Red Alert and Unreal Tournament.

[–] Teal@piefed.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

And there I was playing The Manhole. :)

[–] HeneryHawk@reddthat.com 33 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes!! It'll be fully like being back in the year 2000, widely known as "The DOS days"

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

If it was before XP, it was all DOS underneath.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I bet you had that Windows NT disc version of Diablo 1 too, you pervert.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I definitely own Diablo and I definitely used Win2K, but I didn't go out of my way to buy a weird special version of it. This leads me to believe the normal Windows 95 version would work on NT as well.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I was joking but now I'm wondering if it was just a label change, huh.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago

I ran loads of normal (Windows 9x) games on Windows 2000 Pro.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago

XP? The bloated offspring of Windows 2000?

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 21 points 18 hours ago

To be fair, Red Alert came out in 1996 and was available for DOS.

Red Alert 2, not so much. DOS ports fell off hard by about '98, so this headline is weird.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Arstechnica writers have the technological knowledge of a parakeet.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 13 hours ago

I was gonna say that he might simply not have been around when Red Alert 2 came out, but

https://www.whitepages.com/name/Samuel-Sott-Axon/Los-Angeles-CA/Pl8a1drMk8b

40s Age Range

So he's gotta be born no later than 1985.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Command_%26_Conquer:_Red_Alert_2

Release: NA: October 25, 2000

So he couldn't have been younger than 15 at the game's release (and could have been as old as 25).

That being said, that game came out a quarter-century ago, and there are people in the workforce who won't have been born when it was released. Can't just assume any more.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Parakeets typically understand how to get what they need out of a shell.

[–] JerkyChew@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

ITT: People who don't know that Windows 95-98 and Windows ME were gui front-ends for a DOS kernel.

Most games of this era wouldn't run on Windows 2000, the first consumer Windows OS not built on DOS.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

I never encountered a single Windows 9x game that wouldn't run on Windows 2000 Pro. It was my primary OS in 2003 or so, having moved from Windows 98 SE.

Is this a case of confidently incorrect?

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

ME was the only consumer release in 2000.

2000 was the direct successor to NT4 and was specifically targeting the business market. It was available in Pro, Server, Adv Server, and Datacenter editions. I would not call it a consumer Windows OS.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That‘s interesting because I remember our home computer ran on it for a while. I guess that was only because my father was friends with a PC shop owner who knew about it.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 4 hours ago

ME was basically 98 but much less stable, so a lot of people grabbed a copy of 2000 one way or another to run it at home. XP came out in 2001, bringing an end to DOS based kernels in the Microsoft lineup.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

I distinctly remember running most, if not all, of my games on Windows 2000 (not ME). I mean, yeah, NT 4 was pretty hopeless for gaming, but 2000 was better.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Windows was built on IBM compatible MS-DOS, not regular DOS. The term "DOS" was so ubiquitous with IBM compatibility specifically, that it almost exclusively referred to MS-DOS, and not any other variant. Windows 95 does not run on top of Atari DOS, for example, and therefore trying to run any Windows 95 application in Atari DOS would not be possible.

Software natively compiled for Windows 95 will not usually run in any other variant of DOS than MS-DOS, and in some cases, even MS-DOS itself.

Quake II released in 1997 natively for Windows 95, but was not compatible with other DOS based operating systems at the time. Over the years, fans have tried to "backport" it to other variants of DOS, most notably Q2DOS. But its original PC release does not natively support any OS other than Windows 95. Many games of this era are like this, and a game released in this era usually said it was compatible with "Windows 95/98/ME," not "DOS."