this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
227 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26422 readers
2689 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Monday, men arrived in a boat at a beach in northeast Mexico and installed some signs signaling land that the U.S. Department of Defense considered restricted.

Mexico's Foreign Affairs Ministry said late Monday that the country's navy had removed the signs, which appeared to be on Mexican territory. "The origin of the signs and their placement on national territory were unclear," the ministry said in a statement.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 2 hours ago

We shouldn't have to write on all of the world's land that the US isn't welcome. They should know that already

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Good thing Mexico has those blue hedgehogs

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago

Faux News: Trump has won the Nobel Peace Prize, by convincing Mexico and the Cartels to set aside their differences.

/s. Probably.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

So we're committing an act of war by invading a sovereign nation without an official declaration of war from Congress? "I'm sure this is Constitutional," said no one ever.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

In fairness, we haven't actually issued a Declaration of War since WW2. Everything since has been a policing action authorized under the bi-annual NDAA

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 6 points 2 hours ago

What you call a "policing action", the rest of us call crimes executed by war criminals.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Who had Invasion of Mexico?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

It's the Free Square

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 101 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

How about we fucking not start wars because a pedo wont face the consequences of his own actions, please.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 58 points 19 hours ago

This fucking pedophile and pedophile buddies would rather destroy this country and keep fucking kids than ever owning up to the fact that they're pedophiles.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Especially don’t start wars with nations you share a land border with.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why is that a meaningful distinction?

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well, it’s a whole lot easier for a neighbor to strike back at you.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Right, but why is anyone concerned with if it’s easier to hit America back?

The issue here isn’t that Mexico might strike back, it’s that the US might invade.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, in a contest between "insurgent" cartels and the US Army, I'd bet on the Mexicans every time. This will be another Afghanistan. Prolonged and futile bullshit followed a large military donation to which government replaces the current.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 7 hours ago

If the cartels reached out and the remains of Hegseth was discovered in a wine cask, I would be alright with that.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’m not talking about the moral aspect, just the strategic.

Obviously invading any nation is generally a bad thing.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Strategically it's far easier for the US to roll over the border and secure a neighbouring country compared to the logistics of supplying an occupation force abroad.

It's not like they're under any real threat of losing, and actors can already launch attacks from inside of the US without sharing a border.

And if your objective is annexation of land, well you generally do need to look at your borders unless you want some weird remote colony/not-colony like Gibraltar.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 54 minutes ago

Look at Russia’s invasion of Ukraine for how well that can go.

[–] psoul@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago

Thus have started… the pedo wars

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 47 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Those Epstein files must be really bad.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 20 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty sure his name will be blacked out because of national security reasons. It's the DOJ that's delivering the files

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Got it, so mentally replace 'redacted' with the words Donald Trump

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 7 points 14 hours ago

That's dangerous. Surely there are a lot of other Republicans on that list paying a lot of money to get their names redacted, too. Can't let those child molesters get away from it either. America has a very deep sickness that needs to be cut out.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 25 points 17 hours ago

The origin of the signs is a bunch of idiot gravy seals who thought they were being clever by illegally crossing the border in a little fishing boat and hammering them into sovereign Mexican territory. If you made up the last 10 years nobody would believe you.

[–] skiguy0123@lemmy.ca 18 points 18 hours ago

The signs, driven into the sand near where the Rio Grande empties into the Gulf of Mexico, caused a stir when witnesses said men in a boat arrived at the local beach known as Playa Bagdad and erected them.

Oh that explains it, they must have confused it with Baghdad, Iraq

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 9 points 19 hours ago (4 children)
[–] RalfWausE@blackneon.net 2 points 8 hours ago

USA = Legal Modern Mafia.

Every empire that has existed in the known history has been...

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 1 points 10 hours ago

🌍👨‍🚀🔫👨‍🚀

[–] JackDark@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's definitely not legal in many cases. It's just an that unfortunately no one will do anything about it.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

The issue is law enforcement is run by the ones needing to be arrested.

Were discovering real world examples of why there needs to be a wholly separate investigation and enforcement system with separate control from any of the three branches to handle investigations into the government itself. Relying solely on the public to vote has failed.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 17 hours ago

Depends on what you consider modern. "War is a racket" is a thing for a reason.