this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
231 points (98.7% liked)

Europe

7770 readers
513 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Poland will “never agree” to any EU legislation that would require instant messaging services such as Messenger, WhatsApp or Signal to monitor users for evidence of child abuse, the country’s digital affairs minister said.

Society Poland opposes mandatory EU ‘chat monitoring’ law to combat child abuse fot. TVP Maria Kamińska Edited by: Piotr Kononczuk 17.11.2025, 17:03 Photo: Envato/Kira_Yan, PAP/Radek Pietruszka Digital Affairs Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski said Poland would “never agree" to any mandatory scanning of private communications. Photo: Envato/Kira_Yan, PAP/Radek Pietruszka Poland will “never agree” to any EU legislation that would require instant messaging services such as Messenger, WhatsApp or Signal to monitor users for evidence of child abuse, the country’s digital affairs minister said.

Politics Under a revised version of the EU Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) regulation – approved for further work by an EU Council working group last week – instant messaging providers could voluntarily agree to scan users’ communications for child sexual abuse content.

This marks a watering down of an initial proposal – first presented in 2022 – which would have made message scanning mandatory for all platforms, including those offering end-to-end encryption designed to prevent unauthorized access to private communications.

The legislation has raised concerns over potential violations of privacy rights and has been repeatedly revised, so far failing to secure majority support among EU member states.

Commenting on the revised proposal, Poland’s Digital Affairs Minister Krzysztof Gawkowski, told state news agency PAP on Monday that his country would “never agree to any mandatory scanning", citing concerns over the privacy of communications.

“We are treating the search for a compromise on child protection as a priority and with great consideration,” he said.

“We want legislation that enables us to effectively combat paedophilia while at the same time ensuring the security of all citizens,” he added.

Gawkowski said the latest proposal – put forward by Denmark, which took over the rotating EU Council presidency from Poland in July – aligns with the approach Warsaw advocated during its own presidency of the Council in the first half of 2025.

He also said his team will “monitor the issue” as talks progress, adding that the Polish government’s position would depend on the final draft regulation.

Continue reading - https://tvpworld.com/90062380/poland-against-compulsory-eu-messaging-scans-to-fight-child-abuse

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago

Title lies - again over and over - the law is NOT for child protection, as it would be totally not effective for that. It is all designed to control common citizens!

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, but what about the rest of the EU? Did the vote happen yet? What are the final results?

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The vote is due to take place today. But, as they have done so in the past, they may postpone it until they are confident of it being passed. Germany are believed to be opposing it too.

You can view what each country's stance is, on fightchatcontrol.eu

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I mean this in the most delicate way possible...

Do we even have a CSAM problem on the internet? Like, I'm sure it exists, and should (hopefully) go without saying that CSAM is 100% horrific and disgusting; but to me, it's not exactly something that I see running rampant. It's one of those things I feel like you would have to intentionally go looking for on the deepest, darkest corners of the Dark Web to find.

I just keep seeing all this anti-privacy legislation come up in the name of stopping CSAM. And yea, again, 100% in agreement that CSAM is awful and those that create/share it deserve hell. But... Haven't we already kind of taken care of it? I know the majority of these legislative arguments are BS anyways, and the people arguing don't actually give a shit about kids online, but the arguments don't even make sense anymore.

As a parallel, take bigots who argue against LGBT rights. Their arguments are usually disingenuous and clearly pushing an alternative agenda; but even those lunatics have stopped trying to claim the reason for their hatred is because gays are all diseased and full of AIDS, because most people are well aware that, not only is AIDS not limited to gay people, but AIDS itself is far less of an issue than it was in decades past. Like AIDS is still a terrible disease, but we kind of have it under control at this point and it's silly to talk about as if it's still a crisis.

Do we even have a CSAM crisis that warrants any of this? Even in the heads of those too dumb to realize these things aren't about CSAM at all?

[–] Syun@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, there's enough posted on the open web that one might, if unfortunate, encounter it. I've seen it randomly put up on FB once, by some spam account.

Then there was this creep running for office in Virginia on a platform of enslaving women and getting rid of age of consent laws... I unwisely went to his campaign site to see just how nuts he was, and the guy actually posted CP on there, with a "If elected, I'll legalize THIS" rant underneath. It was pretty appalling. He was promptly thrown out of the Libertarian party, and soon afterward went to prison for exactly what you'd expect... and he thankfully killed himself pretty quickly.

It was relatively recently when I learned how prevalent it is on twitter. What I've learned about CP on the internet is that it's all over the open web, but the platforms it's shared on don't seem to be very interested in cracking down. If the EU wanted to do something about it, they'd light a fire under some asses to regulate their own sites rather than roll out nonsense like this law.

[–] hannesh93@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

At least in germany the police is already overwhelmed working with the information they get.

Journalists have gotten more CSAM deleted from the internet that them - and only after these informed the police about it and the stuff was still online almost a year later...

Also the judges of that area are way overworked and cases take ages to be decided.

This whole thing is too much cryptofascism fantasy needing an unlimited police force to even work.

There's never been a more clear virtue signalling coupled with massive lobby interests than this law...

To add to that: almost all experts in that field will tell you that they prefer the money that'd need to be spent on implementing this to be spent on prevention programs (and educating kids about sexuality asap to they know what's wrong and when they have to speak with another adult about it) instead.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The main problem with CSAM is not you encountering it, the problem is children being abused when producing it. Whether the material produced reaches a wide audience doesn't impact their suffering. So what's relevant is the scale at which it's being produced, which I think is fairly independent of the likelihood of you encountering it without looking for it.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that is kind of a misunderstaning on their part.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's one of those things I feel like you would have to intentionally go looking for on the deepest, darkest corners of the Dark Web to find.

Yes, but the problem isnt the internet being flooded by CSAM out of nowhere. Its people organizing and sharing through encrypted messaging. And yes, Im sure its a real problem, but taking away peoples privacy will not fix it.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

My impression is that we absolutely have an active issue with CSAM 😅

Its tucked away in the corners, but I don't think its hard to find if you go looking for it. And if its in an encrypted chatroom you really don't know the scope of the issue there without like a sting to get into the room, and then you have no way of identifying anyone.

That being said, there are huge tradeoffs to privacy and security to scan everything, and I'm not at all about to argue that there aren't extremely bad faith reasons to push this kinds of legislation.

But I don't think the issue it aims at addressing is in any way shape or form fabricated

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Hey, that is an actually good argument. Hard to see those nowadays.

[–] 100@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

exactly this wouldnt change anything when investigating these crimes

you require law enforcement with enough resources to investigate cases they receive already

[–] StraponStratos@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’ve heard huge amounts of it are stored and traded on the open web. Literally posting it on Twitter etc, but the networks are relatively closed so outsiders don’t see these social groups.