this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
219 points (92.9% liked)

Technology

76945 readers
2973 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

Suspiciously all blonde haired and blue eyed. All with reduced intelligence unless you pay a lifelong subscription.

[–] harambe69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

This is how I find out that he's gay?

Well, good for him and his partner.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

Anytime any non scientist wants to genetically engineer babies you should get very worried

When crypto or ai bros want to do that get outright scared

Wait a tic. I've seen this movie.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago (4 children)

so all Lemmy takes from this article is that Sam Altman is gay.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Tim Cook, Sam Altman, Peter Thiel.

We have enough data points to suggest that being gay doesn't insulate you from being greedy and corrupt.

That's important, too.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gay people are just as shitty as everyone else. They're no better or no worse. They just have sex with people of the same gender.

Who you want to fuck REALLY doesn't matter, like, at all, imo, in the grand scheme of things.

Unless you want to fuck everyone.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We have a code of conduct training at work that includes and anti corruption segment (nothing weird, just stuff like "a vendor buying lunch at a sales meeting is fine, but no gifts or having lunch at extremely expensive places", and "some places give small symbolic gifts around holidays, usually a pastry. That's fine. Do not accept a $500 pastry")

A couple years ago they updated the module and the person engaging in non-obvious corrupt business practices became gay in passing. The overwhelming response by a lot of the company was "yay! We made it guys! They realized that we like bribes too! I feel so seen".

If someone was going to accept a $500 pastry, I'd put my money on the gay guy.

(It's me.)

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why would it? I have never thought to myself, this seems like a bad person but he is gay so maybe not. :)

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In a different time, it was popular to think that capitalism would be better if minorities were winning at it.

A few girlbosses and Diddys later, I'd like to think we know better.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, now we have a bigger pool to recruit our sociopaths from. Big win, huh?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

I thought this was a commonly known fact. He wasn't hiding it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nagaram@startrek.website 110 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Odd way to learn altman is gay.

Kinda shocked I've never seen a "worlds richest gay man!" Headline. That feels like low hanging fru-

[–] Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 3 days ago

Gay is only bad if the poors do it, of course /s

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Does Thiel not have more money?

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Thiel killed the outlet that outed him.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Another one I didn't know is gay.

Props to msm for not making it a big deal

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

Thiel was outed by Gawker and made it a mission to secretly fund the Hulk Hogan lawsuit which resulted in Gawker going bankrupt: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdrange/2016/06/21/peter-thiels-war-on-gawker-a-timeline/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

I worry more about that he is a full blown psycho.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago

Honestly I don't think it's any of our business. Even rich assholes are allowed to have a private life. Although with some (Musk, Trump) that private life is so fucked up it's impossible to ignore, but generally I'm totally fine with not knowing who they fuck.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 230 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 101 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The ability to reduce diseases and disorders in newborns sounds wonderful, until you find out which techno-fascist is behind the movement.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The other issue I have is that this is an example of a recurring issue in which the tech obsessed ultra wealthy declare their plan to solve a problem for which a very straightforward policy solution already exists.

We don't need tech to extend lives or feed the hungry. We just need to remove the paywalls to existing resources.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, here's an easy way to prevent most birth defects:

Free nutritious food
Regulating toxic chemicals
Prenatal education and healthcare

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Neoliberal utopia. The wealthy elite destroying the world and forcing eugenics on the masses fly a rainbow flag

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

Its working.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 52 points 3 days ago (1 children)

the headline misspelled eugenics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 51 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

In before this turns into "I want my baby to have blue eyes and 150 IQ"

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's an interesting ethical debate.

I have a hereditary condition which passes only by the X chromosome, so should I, as a man, abort a daughter? Because now the risk is too high and I've elected to simply not have children. It would be great if I could fix the single swapped base pair that would otherwise cause disfigurement and life-long health problems.

[–] KatakiY@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Yeah I'm always conflicted. Like eugenics is the end goal for these fascists but also... We should try to prevent hereditary defects rtct

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The same guy who admitted he couldn't raise his child without ChatGPT btw.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Sounds like he's trying to create his own Musk-esq mythos.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 33 points 3 days ago (5 children)

They do realize that this is how most zombie apocalypse movies start. Genetic tapering to stop diseases.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So we’re skipping the Bell Riots and straight into Eugenics War?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Give me Butlerian jihad or give me death!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 15 points 3 days ago

ah, ok, so GATTACA is up next. got it.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 25 points 3 days ago (17 children)

I'm not sure I get the universal negativity to this. Like sure, Altman sucks as a person, and an individual having enough money to significantly bankroll research like this is a sign of an economic failure, but surely curing or preventing genetic disease is just about the most uncontroversial use human genetic modification could have?

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 50 points 3 days ago

He's a bad person and he's always lying.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (6 children)

It'll only be available for the super rich, will expand to other augmentations/engineering, and will result in further reinforcing social mobility boundaries.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] qweertz@programming.dev 28 points 3 days ago

"What's bad with eugenics for the rich?"

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This really reminds me of “Brave New World”, kind of scary actually.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›