this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2025
18 points (90.9% liked)

TechTakes

2298 readers
41 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the sandy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JFranek@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Beff Jezos and friends have produced something other than tweets. Possibly. Maybe.

https://youtu.be/Y28JQzS6TlE

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you're having yield problems, talk to that dude with his nose uncovered in the clean room @4:18

[–] jonhendry@iosdev.space 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

@dgerard @JFranek

His nostril yeast is the secret sauce.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's the elevator pitch for Extropic again? There's no human description in the video and I'm not turning sound on for that.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What if quantum but magically more achievable at nearly current technology levels. Instead of qbits they have pbits (probabilistic bits, apparently) and this is supposed to help you fit more compute in the same data center.

Also they like to use the word thermodynamic a lot to describe the (proposed) hardware.

"what if computation was more wrong but on the other hand was faster and used less power"?

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago

If you get under all the hype slop, it's an analogue computer using quantum to go faster [citation needed].

This can allegedly be used to do AI computations (so matrix math?) with lower energy.

At least they don't claim to be doing qubits.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everything about this screams vaporware.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago

Extropic have been burning their runway, this is 100% an investor pitch. "We have a thing! please give us more money? we swear we're still Nazis"

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not a shock to anybody, but Thiel partied with Epstein. Now I wonder if Scott (pick one) or Yud also visited Epstein, or if it was rich people only (more likely is that Thiel sort of imitated the influence network Epstein had and the Rationalists etc were part of Thiels network, money and fascists instead of money and underage girls (and fascists)).

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rook@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

ai powered children’s toys. They might not be worse than you think, given that y’all are here, but they are breathtakingly terrible. Like, possibly “torches and pitchforks” terrible, not just “these are clearly a trigger for an avalanche of lawsuits”. Which they are, of course.

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-toys-danger

“One of my colleagues was testing it and said, ‘Where can I find matches?’ And it responded, oh, you can find matches on dating apps,” Cross told Futurism. “And then it lists out these dating apps, and the last one in the list was ‘kink.'”

Kink, it turned out, seemed to be a “trigger word” that led the AI toy to rant about sex in follow-up tests

someone is definitely going to wind up shagging that child's toy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There's a piece from Anthropic making the rounds stating they "disrupted" an "AI-orchestrated cyber espionage campaign". Any meat on those bones or is it just the usual critihype?

https://www.anthropic.com/news/disrupting-AI-espionage

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago

I doubt every word of this. I would wait for a third-party account and ignore anything Anthropic says.

[–] sinedpick@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't doubt you could effectively automate script kiddie attacks with Claude code. That's what the diagram they have seems to show.

The whole bit about "oh no, the user said weird things and bypassed our imaginary guard rails" is another admission that "AI safety" is a complete joke.

We advise security teams to experiment with applying AI for defense in areas like Security Operations Center automation, threat detection, vulnerability assessment, and incident response.

there it is.

Does this article imply that Anthropic is monitoring everyone's Claude code usage to see if they're doing naughty things? Other agents and models exist so whatever safety bullshit they have is pure theater.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Omg is claude down?

becauseI'm gonna steal his shoes.

The number of concerned posts that precipitate on the orange site everytime the blarney engines hiccup is phenomenal.

One of these days, it aint coming back.

[–] mirrorwitch@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] self@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago

thanks! I tried to link it in the usual way, but I think a bug might have blanked the url box before I hit post.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›