this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
670 points (98.6% liked)

RPGMemes

14283 readers
845 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago

Lovecraft: "Write that down, write that down!"

[–] erie09@lemmy.world 83 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fun fact! This stat block predates the birth of the child in the post!

[–] Prox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a real stat block? The "it's" typo feels sus.

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

It's not official, but why does that matter?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I would homebrew this as the result of a failed attempt to create a Dracolich/Drow combo. Find it restrained in a dungeon "lab", long abandoned, but still alive because it's undead.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It sorta looks like somebody kitbashed a new mini and had to invent a stat block for it.

When I have print failures, I try to kitbash failed pieces together into monstrosities. I totally believe this.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That creature looks uncomfortable. Also, it's been a while since I did anything D&D — aren't those stats buffed a whole lot?

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A Google search (ai response, so take it with a grain of salt) suggested a 5 person party could take a dragon with 136 hp and 18 a at levels 8-9 comfortably. 7-8 would be hard, 5-6 would be very difficult but possible. Depends on the DM too.

Note I don't play much 5e, and my experience in TTRPGs outside a few single session stuff is mostly one Pathfinder 2e campaign currently at level 6.

[–] guy@piefed.social 31 points 1 week ago
[–] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 1 week ago

Thanks, I hate it

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

That would actually make someone in my table pass out, not even joking

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There's too many of these "that happened" posts featuring a child playing a tabletop. They would just be unfunny nonsense if it weren't framed as something a child actually said.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

I get the sentiment generally, but that’s exactly how my five year old nephew talks (if I were to edit for brevity, which I appreciate in the relaying of anecdotes about five year olds, lol)

[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

RedWyrm is especially notorious for that. Their child also doesn't age correctly.

To give them the benefit of the doubt, might they simply be telling true stories out of order?

[–] tyler@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In what way is it unfunny nonsense? Seems like a legit monster to me.

[–] mika_mika@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, if it sounds like a legit monster, the fact that a 5yo said it wouldn't be relevant, and without it being absurd the post kinda loses all substance. It is held up by the implication that this odd exchange actually happened, which it didn't.

"Imagine if there was a spider dragon with a breath attack of breathing thousands of tiny spiders" just doesn't have the same hook as this exposition.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

Huh? You said it would be unfunny nonsense if it wasn’t a child that said it. I’m saying the child has nothing to do with it, it’s a cool monster anyway, it isn’t nonsense.

Now you’re saying that it’s not about being unfunny or nonsense, it’s that it doesn’t “have the same hook”. Which is it? Is it nonsense? Or do you just not like the method of delivery?

Have you actually played a ttrpg? Or really heard any jokes at all? The way a line is delivered matters. Saying “i beat the goblin” is completely different than saying “i sliced through the goblin, cutting it in half, its body flying through the air where i punt it between the masts of the sailboat like a field goal”. They might be the same exact outcome, the same exact scenario, but the delivery makes one more fun than the other.

The spider dragon sounds like a dope-ass monster to fight, and the kid sounds like an awesome GM. You can have the cool monster with your GM. The delivery here allows you to imagine the fun you can have.

Put it another way: ‘“imagine there was a small short green goblin that fights” just doesn’t have the same hook as this expression’. No shit sherlock.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

Hebegeebees, +7

[–] wazzupdog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago

Brb making a char sheet of this for my bestiary

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

5 years old and already an understudy of Satan!

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago
[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Spider dragonborn or dragon spiderborn?

[–] pelya@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

See, when a spider and a dragon love each other very very much...

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

That's what the old half-dragon template was for.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

Horrible.

Whoever raised his kid is doing it right.

Kid knows what they’re doing.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

well fuck… i’m not gonna sleep tonight.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Spider Dragonborn Sorcerer; It's Spider-Man but with Fireball.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 5 points 1 week ago

This is awesome!

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This kid will dream about Bluey and wake up in a cold sweat.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They did that in the newest Vecna campaign I'm running. Was indeed quite terrifying

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

He went on to write the storyline for blood born and design Rom, the vacuous spider.

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 week ago

Bad AI slop is bad.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You wasted a gallon of water for this? Fucking why? Get out of here with this ai slop

[–] Archpawn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah. A gallon of water might not sound like much, but it adds up. If you generate two images a day for a year, it's as bad as eating a whole cheeseburger. Assuming the gallon is accurate and not an exaggeration.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dude, push the anti-meat shit elsewhere. AI is something that is causing new, extreme damage for literally no benefit. You're not going to convince anyone by attacking other movements.

Also, I'm a vegetarian, go bark up a different tree.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The point isn't being anti-meat, it's perspective. The water consumption of AI is completely negligible compared to literally every other facet of our consumption and really isn't worth using to demonstrate how bad AI is.

AI's consumption of electricity, on the other hand...

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's a tangible example that you can use to demonstrate the absolute waste to someone. Yeah, it's less water waste than electricity waste, but people can't visualize the amount of electricity being used and have that be a concrete thing in their mind. Pouring out a gallon of water is an immediately identifiable thing. And the point is to make people associate the absolute reckless waste with the use of ai.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

Pouring out a gallon of water is an immediately identifiable thing

Yes, as in "you can impress people with that", no, as in "it gives any sort of accurate perception"

There are plenty of things that consume orders of magnitude more water than AI. You'll be much better off ecologically by skipping the last few seconds of your shower or eating a tiny slice of meat less every week than by not using these tools.

Besides, many of them can be run on your regular, air-cooled PC.

That's not to say that AI training in general is not an ecological issue - but most of it actually goes in directions other than LLMs and image generation tools, and for models already trained, the footprint is straight up negligible. You likely wasted more energy reading this than getting an AI to make an image for you.

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

Wait, people can’t visualize the amount of electricity used for something? Oh, right, not everyone is an electrical engineer.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, but that one bottle is dwarfed by the 600 gallons for one cheeseburger. That's the point I, and the previous poster, are trying to make.

I hear what you're saying, I just disagree on the effectiveness of the image I guess.

This is about 10x worse than just imagining