this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
272 points (96.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

33210 readers
347 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flipflop97@discuss.tchncs.de 66 points 10 months ago (5 children)
[–] southernwolf@pawb.social 24 points 10 months ago

Lol, this both shows how bad most models are... But also how damn good the two big OSS models are, DeepSeek and Kimi.

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago
[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What an acid trip of a site. It updated while I was scrolling and legit thought I was having a flashback.

[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I ran into the same thing - they seem to change (potentially to other outputs from the same model?) when you click on the Question mark and go back.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Question mark says they are updated every minute, even gives you a prompt.

Watching for several minutes, none of then was good except Kimi K2. Sure, not every time, but solid third of them was actually working, while the others scored a perfect 0.

Also, as a Kimi K2 user (because Kagi), I approve. I don't use Kimi K2 for coding, though, because JetBrains doesn't offer that, but I use it in Kagi Assistant.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

deepseek v3.1 had an (almost) perfect clock once for me.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Did it show the correct time? Did it tick correctly? From my observations, even clocks that looked okay had like wrong second speed, swapped hour and minute, or was rotated altogether.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah it was showing the correct time and right tick speed. But it was only one of the clocks on that model. The rest were wrong.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah it was showing the correct time and right tick speed. But it was only one of the clocks on that model. The rest were wrong.

[–] mogranja@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

You know, it looks like clocks drawn by dementia patients

[–] satanmat@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Oh my god. I love that so much.

Now I need to do that but randomize which one is displayed ….

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That really is more logical. (Except that the initial element generally goes in the top slot of the clock. Note that 12 is the first hour both of AM and of PM.)

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

A strictly logical clock for a 24-hour day would have 0 at the top with 1 on the right and 23 on the left. And it would be only ever set to UTC.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A strictly logical 24 hour clock would just display the digits tbh.

[–] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 4 points 10 months ago

I'm not sure I'd argue binary is more or less "logical". A number is a number.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

UTC has leap seconds. We can do better. PTP/TAI for lyfe.

A perfectly logical clock would use a radio broadcast to count off seconds since a predefined epoch. Put a few of them way up high, so more people can see it, and make them so astonishingly precise that you could tell where you are just by listening.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

They should put atomic clocks in the GPS satellites for exactly this purpose.

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Look away, I don't want you to see me cry

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Well, if we're saving DB space, why not just use the generate_series function (assuming you're running PostgreSQL...)?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hey man, shoulda coulda woulda, was it in the spec?

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What's a little scope creep between friends?

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why limit it to friends? In my company, we do scope creep for everyone!

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 3 points 10 months ago

There's something to be said for consistency!

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wait until you learn how months are numbered in some programming languages.

The clever documentation calls it "months since January".

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

JavaScript: Hold my Date!

new Date().getYear() == 125

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 2 points 10 months ago

JavaScript is in that set of "some" languages. Most of it ties back to C's struct tm which zero-indexes months (0-11), weekdays (0-6), and the rarely used day of year (0-365), as well as offsetting years by 1900.

The odd man out, so to speak, is the date (or "mday" as it's called there), which is in the range 1-31. One (Perl) book I own suggests that the zero-based ones are used to index arrays of strings and implies this one is different because it generally isn't used that way.

But anyway, these are decisions made 50 years ago that still haunt us.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And then you added 1, right?

...right?

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Not very future proof, what if the "numbers" eventually no longer become numbers?

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This clock starts at both one and at zero!

img

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Content not viewable in your region

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Imgur have blocked the uk because they don't want to have to deal with ID shit our government pushed through without properly thinking it through

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago

Ah, I must have forgotten to turn my VPN back on

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 10 months ago

That's odd. Here is the URL - https://i.imgur.com/YAGpXPd.png - it's just straight-up an imgur image. This is literally the first time I am hearing that this can happen to imgur images.:-(

The image is the speechless stick figure meme. Here, I found another source:

img

That seems not very welcoming to exclude people from viewing such images!

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 10 months ago

Undecimal supremacy!

[–] coreray00@discuss.online 2 points 10 months ago

Everything’s an entity if you really think about it 😔