this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
109 points (95.8% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

14407 readers
380 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 106 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This is standard practice in europe

One more lie from reddit, for karma. Pathetic.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah I saw that... The fuck it is not.
Jeeze people trying to argue that Europe is different from america I get but not pretending you get locked in grocery stores to do so.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I have seen scan gates after self checkout counters before. In Albert Heiijn shops in Amsterdam and in Lidl Shops in Zürich.

But Coop and Migros Shops don't have them in Switzerland. I think the 7/11 in Copenhagen also didn't but I'm not sure of my memory.

[–] Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We have a scangate at my local edeka. But you could still just walk by the normal checkouts if you don't have anything

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

never in my life living in EU countries have I witnessed such bullshit

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

The one way gates are standard, the only exit being ticket scan isn't. The change is supposedly only the one way gates, so they're half truthing to pretend it's normal.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 59 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

"You didn't have what I wanted at a price-point I found acceptable, but that's all right - I came prepared with full camping gear and my own sleeping bag. Don't worry about it - you'll hardly notice me sticking around, possibly for ever."

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah never purchase and you can never leave. Just beg for food from those that want to leave desperately enough. They get their receipt and you get their items.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 12 points 2 weeks ago

And you repay the establishment for the inconvenience of your unlawful imprisonment by advertising their special services to all the other visiting patrons. That seems fair.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, I do have to wonder how many people with physical or mental disabilities are effectively just going to be trapped in here.

Also get the sense that they'll have more and more and more and more and more security in and around the building as younger people start passing around exploits in the security setup.

[–] xxce2AAb@feddit.dk 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Well, I mean, even if the thing has access to a shared PoS DB using properly randomized, sufficiently long and non-sequential transaction tokens, it's still deliciously susceptible to simple malicious compliance: Find the cheapest single item carried by the store, fill up an entire basket with them sumbitches, line up each item separated by a divider and insist on a receipt for each separate transaction to "prepare for any future need to check if the store carries anything i actually want while maintaining strict compliance with store policies". Then, head outside and start distributing whatever it is for free to other prospective customers and use that to strike up a conversation about the recent changes. You never know. People might get ideas.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 57 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

New gates at the entrance automatically swing open when customers walk in, but they’re set to trigger an alarm if someone attempts to back out.

This sounds like a great way to troll them. There's nothing illegal or even just wrong about deciding to turn around when entering a store, so alarm away! What do I care, I have time.

I already set off alarms all the time at stores with these gates. They seem to be set to close completely after every customer enters. Or maybe the ones near me just need their motion sensors adjusted, to be a little more sensitive. Either way, I just don’t stop walking, and usually end up hip-checking it out of the way since they’re still trying to close when I approach. They’re not difficult to open and they don’t hurt. But forcing them open (by just walking through them) sets off the alarm.

I don’t even bother slowing down or acting surprised. I just keep moving to whatever I was going to buy while the alarm blares behind me. It’ll stop after a few seconds, meaning it only seems to go off while the gate is actively being held open. If someone truly wanted to be annoying and malicious, I guess they could just set a shopping cart inside the gate as they walk through, so an employee would actually need to manually intervene and move the cart.

[–] False@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think I'd just leave though the fire exit.

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Beat me to this response by an hour. Who the fuck do they think they are, right? What if I can't find what I'm looking for, or was just browsing?

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

People go to grocery stores to just browse? I'm not defending this, I just thought it an odd argument.

If I went into a store that demanded money to regain my freedom, they'd find themselves in a precarious legal situation pretty quick. Unlawful detention quickly turns into kidnapping charges, or, an "I feared for my life" defense (2A) situation.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My wife and I just yesterday stopped at a Target while on a 5 hour drive. We were looking for a specific pharmacy item. They didn’t have it at that store. We didn’t need anything else so we didn’t buy anything. That might not be as common in a grocery store, but it’s not unheard of.

And then there’s always the chance of “I just got an emergency phone call” and need to forget about shopping…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago

"Hmmm, I'm looking for this thing. I hope they have it" and then they don't

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Not to browse, but I've left empty handed (without shoplifting!) plenty of times if what I wanted wasn't in stock.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

People go into stores to see what it’s like. They may leave for reasons like not finding what they wanted or being offended at being treated as a criminal. If I saw this crap, I can see my reaction likely being to just leave and go somewhere I’m more welcome

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Not quite like window shopping in a department store per se, but essentially the same if I can't find what I was looking for and search for alternatives on the way out. I've gotten weird looks sometimes when this happens, including cases where I'm asked for a receipt. "You didn't have what I was looking for" or "What receipt? I didn't buy anything" seem to satisfy staff inasmuch as I'm not a tiny person and aren't inclined to take shit from rent-a-cop security or management - just try to detain me, I'm not waiting for the cops, I'm dealing with it first hand right away.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My thought was checking if their pharmacy has my meds in stock

[–] TrojanRoomCoffeePot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This too, especially the way that a lot of retail has started to graft pharmacies onto their stores.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have to go to a bunch of pharmacies every month to try to find Adderall

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is this not illegal as hell?

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 35 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh for sure this would be unlawful imprisonment and probably break some minor fire codes but who cares about that kind of stuff these days.

There is profit at stake!

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah like the time a book store locked me and my wife inside. I pushed on the door not knowing it was locked and it broke open. Guess due to the emergency exit bar. They got pissed but I told them they illegal locked us in and fuck off.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This isn't a minor fire code. but a death trap

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

And for that very reason, it's also extremely illegal. If the fire exit is the only way to get out in the event of a fire, and it's blocked by said fire...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So.....fire hazard. Got it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Huh. I'm reminded of Roller Coaster Tycoon, which has scenarios where you have to have a certain number of guests in your park at a specific time; and a valid strategy is to get enough people to come into your park, and then delete the path behind them so that they literally can't get out.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Peak American entrpreneurship

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago

Are you really playing Roller Coaster Tycoon if you aren't torturing your guests

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Doing so will cause a decrease in your park rating, When guests are trying to leave but unable to find the exit, it lowers the rating significantly. There's a reason every guest goal scenario has a park rating requirement as well.

It is effective up to a point. It takes time before the guests realize they're trapped and kill your rating. You have to time it right. The guest spawn rate calculations include the rating, so a low rating also reduces the number of guests who spawn. Trap the guests too soon and you'll never get enough.

Trapping guests with no entry signs or removing the route to the exit will ruin your park in time. It can be effective in some specific circumstances but not many.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You cannot stop me, that's false imprisonment and you have no authority in this jurisdiction. I will be leaving, or I will be pressing charges. Your choice. That's not even close to enough for reasonable suspicion (which is debatably actionable anyway in most circumstances).

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unfortunately you have limited opportunity to make a fuss. Looks like they can claim the security guard can let you out.

Or maybe pull the fire alarm, idk. I don’t see how blocking the exits for an emergency is acceptable

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Speaking of fires, what time does that store close and the people leave?

More than one way to skin a building.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

So false imprisonment is acceptable now if it’s a corporation doing it?

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Looks like a little glassbreak keychain tool would make for a quick and crunchy exit.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 9 points 2 weeks ago

Me personally, I'd start kicking and hospital bills means a reason to sue.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

While I watched some customers struggle with the new technology, my receipt scanned immediately. The glass doors slid open, and I was free. But if, like this person on the San Francisco subreddit recounted, I hadn’t bought anything, my only means of exit would have been to beg the security guard to let me out.

The security guard

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

Experienced similar at a Vons in Long Beach, CA. Not only that, but leaving from the checkout was itself a small maze-like experience. This won't last long once people die or are injured.

[–] Sunsofold@lemmings.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

NFPA 101 -

7.1.10.1 "Means of egress shall be continuously maintained free of all obstructions"

7.2.1.5.2 "Locks and latches shall not require the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort for operation from the egress side."

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They can't hold you hostage. Oh wait, it's the USA . Maybe that's legal now. I don't know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 8 points 2 weeks ago

We made it so that there was the least friction to people just buying constantly and freely... Well now we need app operated coupons, face scanning entrances and receipt operated exits with merchandise locked behind plexiglass...

Why are customers so reluctant to buy now?!

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

How has the fire department not come down on them like a ton of bricks?! Maybe the fire exits are accessible, but those are meant to be additional exits, not the primary means of egress.

I cannot believe they stay in business. The first time I have to scan my receipt to leave, fuck that noise, never going back.

On top of all that, several idiots at Safeway had to approve this thing. This shouldn't have made it past a loss prevention idiot bringing it up in a meeting. "Jesse, what are you talking about?"

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

I've seen the entry gates in stores, where you can't go out the front very easily. Except, you can force them open with a little bit of pressure. And yes, it sets off an alarm. It isn't terribly loud, but it will turn heads.

You don't owe anyone an explanation as to why you're leaving through the entrance. They also can't bar you from leaving if you don't buy anything. I'm willing to bet those exit gates open just as easily. The article cites fire codes, but it's also false imprisonment to keep people from leaving without probable cause to detain. That's why a lot of stores' policy is to let you exit the store even if they know you shoplifted. Because for it to be an actual theft, you must deprive them of their ability to sell it. Just pocketing it isn't enough — once you step off the property however, you're guilty of shoplifting. With the gates clearly being inside the store, even if you are holding merchandise you haven't paid for, they have no legal cause to detain you.

The law is not clear on what your rights are if they are not actively detaining you and you are not able to leave, at least not here. Where you are, it may be different. I do know if you break something trying to leave, you can be charged with vandalism or destruction of property. If they've barricaded you in, they have to lift the barricade upon request. The law is fuzzy on how long they have to do it, though. So they can obstruct you from leaving for a time but they can't detain you. What's the difference? The law is not clear. It's not five minutes, it's not ten minutes, it's not an hour. But also, if you hop over the thing without damaging it, you're legally in the clear. And it looks like you can hop over it without much effort.

I'm not a big fan of Safeway. They have nice stores, and I enjoyed their soda (Safeway Select) when I was younger. Now, I don't drink soda. I do admit they have good products (that they make) and clean stores, for the most part. When I am in Northern California, though, another chain gets my business. I don't hate Safeway, but they are not my first choice.

load more comments
view more: next ›