this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
149 points (98.1% liked)

politics

31043 readers
1849 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MisterNeon@lemmy.world 166 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Brace? That's not the verb I would use.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't know how I'll survive the celebrations, I'm bracing myself.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 10 months ago

I know how I’ll survive. It’ll be vodka, lots of vodka. That’s how I’ll make it through the celebrations.

[–] Beebabe@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Use ice as a mixer

[–] wavebeam@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

They mean “brace” as in one of those things you attach to act as a support for structural deficiencies. They need to “brace” Nancy because she’s too old to stay upright on her own.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

Brace yourself for how hard we're gonna party

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 10 months ago

Its gonna suck when its bernie but yeah this one its fine.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 months ago
[–] sheridan@lemmy.world 68 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ReiRose@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

"I'm sure your nephew will grow up to be a fine man, Mr. President!"

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Bet she saw John John’s Johnson.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

It's the gloves.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 51 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

"Brace"?? Lmao I can't wait. They sold us out to Trump only to boost their investment portfolios... Good riddance she's leaving. She should have left 25 years ago. As should Schumer.

[–] HuskerNation@lemmynsfw.com 36 points 10 months ago (3 children)

About fucking time. Now Schumer and Warren

[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Warren? Schemer I get. Warren is great in my eyes, that’s like wanting RBG to step down. What did I miss?

[–] SalaciousBCrumb@lemy.lol 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

RBG not stepping down was a huge problem and let Trump pick a justice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What did I miss?

In 2020 Warren got grifted into hiring Mike McCollum from Hillary's 2016 team.

Warren thought he'd actually help, but he tried (and succeeded) into making her campaign a kamikaze attack on Bernie so Biden could take it.

So Warren was great, and she's done a lot of good...

But she's old enough she's getting taken advantage of like this and needs to step down.

There's a reason the oligarchs want confused 80 year olds in office. They're easily tricked even if they have good intentions.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That wasn't her "getting grifted". She's an establishment shill.

Bernie tried to convince her to run in 2016 instead of him, because he wanted a "real progressive" to run again at Hillary. She refused, so he ran instead.

Then in 2020, she ran against him in order to split the progressive vote in primary, and hired Clinton advisors in order to do it. Her main campaign strategy was to paint him as a misogynist, and to offer an "alternative" to Medicare for All that primarily benefitted the private insurance industry. And when everyone else dropped out of the race, in order to back Biden...she stayed in, just to make sure Bernie lost votes.

She is a fucking traitor. Mistakes are "once in a while" decisions that don't go the way you intended them to. But when every decision ultimately benefits the establishment old guard...it's not a mistake. It's an agenda.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] supernight52@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Warren just comes out of the woodwork every 4 years to try and take up the moderate votes, so they are less likely to vote for any actually good candidate. She needs to go. Plus, she's too old. Just like the majority of our government. We need an age cap.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If anything, Warren making some room in MA for a younger more progressive Senate Dem could be the angle.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

They'll immediately find another old fuck neoliberal to fill the spot.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

RBG not stepping down was a huge deal. She died while Trump was in office instead of letting Obama choose someone younger while he was still in office. It was arrogant and short-sighted of her.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Pelosi is unquestionably sharper than Schumer.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

how about everyone over 70? The average age of these zombies is 65.

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 20 points 10 months ago

Good Jesus Christ she needs to sit the fuck down.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

WHAT? But she's ONLY Almost 90 Years old! She has SO Much Time LEFT to ~~Pad her Portfolio~~ Help her Constituents!

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

ELI5: why do people imminent to death grab money? What will they do with it?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

She’s moving to a Bloomberg Terminal up-state.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 18 points 10 months ago
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 16 points 10 months ago

Brace as in brace for all the alcohol I will consume in celebration?

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"Brace" implies they are completely unprepared and fully expected her to serve 50 more years.

Edit: yeah called it

“I wish she would stay for 10 more years,” said one House Democrat from California.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 8 points 10 months ago

I mean, she's making them a lot money....

[–] spongebue@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

That House Democrat from California's name? Nancy Pelosi.

(In all seriousness, she's been fairly progressive as far as Dem leadership goes, and would do enough behind the scenes that she would only take a vote when she knows she has the votes. Not a fan of all the insider stock trading by any means. Either way, I wish she had passed the torch years ago along with many others in Washington)

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Fucking GOOD!! You greedy dinosaurs are the reason the Democrats are on life support right now!

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

That's a weird way to spell party.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Oh no! What are we going to do with our beloved out of touch gerontocrat?

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 8 points 10 months ago

Please, Nancy. Fucking retire.

[–] Nyxias@fedia.io 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thank god. Didn't fight hard enough to get the asshole in power completely impeached when the time was right to.

I'm actually ready to see if the democrats have a spine for a new leader. Schumer should follow her lead too. Time for a new direction.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

She already stepped down as leader in the house. That job was taken up by Jeffries. Who has been entirely useless.

He's exceeded their expectations, I assume.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Just fuck off already. You’ve done enough damage. Staying after you left the house just made things worse. Empower the younger democrats.

[–] SalaciousBCrumb@lemy.lol 4 points 10 months ago

She should be facing life in prison not retirement.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

She is getting old. I understand it.

load more comments
view more: next ›