this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2025
814 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

17377 readers
898 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

PLEASE CHECK THIS OUT. Our own Aeronmelon is going through some shit at the moment and could use some help. Check it out here and consider an upvote or a comment to push it into activity. Sorry, not something I do often or will be spamming. But I care about my friend and if I can get a couple more eyes on his situation then I'm going to try to do what I can.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dampyr@piefed.social 81 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why does it remind me of this?

meme kissing

[–] Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 70 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I found this to help me imagine the shape:

[–] PaintedSnail@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Wouldn't that make the face on the right non-planar?

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 6 points 3 weeks ago

If you’re free to put the center vertex anywhere, then I’d think you could position it to avoid that…

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That scutoid (possibly all of them, I don't know) is just a pentagonal prism with a corner cut off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 55 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

STOP MAKING NEW SHAPES.

WE HAVE ENOUGH SHAPES.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm not sure.

My doctor always says that I'm out of shape, so I'm sure I should get a new one

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

We already have all the shapes we need. Square. Circle. Octagon. Tetrahedron. Tesseract. Penis.

That's enough shapes.

[–] noodly_appendage@lemmy.myserv.one 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you just skip Hexagons?! Hexagons are the Bestagons!

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Octagons and hexagons are the same thing. It's right there in the name. Gon. It's okay, many people think they're different shapes, it's a very very common misconception.

[–] noodly_appendage@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, I actually didn't know that. Thats a really interesting fact, thanks!

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Nonagon infinity opens the door.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

SEE?

END THE MADNESS.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Finally, they made Polygon 2

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When will we get Polygon Z?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah just make it a 3d rectangle and slap a +/-10% on it

[–] AlchemicalAgent@mander.xyz 6 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, a fellow engineer!

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Polygottem lmao

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Looks like a bunch of triangles to me

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 8 points 3 weeks ago

Reticulating Splines

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You may ignore curvature for this assignment

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Ma'am before you said that I had already started to convert to a flat earther our education system thanks you.

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Any teachers here wanna weigh in on the ability of current kids' ability to write complete sentences, let alone calculate the area of this shape?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

on the ability of current kids’ ability

XD

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 5 points 3 weeks ago

-50 persuasion

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Given enough time and known lengths, most of my students should be able to calculate the surface area of this by the time they graduate. They'd just split everything into triangles and quadrangles, use the formula for each, then add everything together. It's not that useful of an exercise though, didactically speaking, because once you grasp that process, it's just repetitive and lengthy. There'd have to be a LOT of given values to make this solvable, too.

On a more subjective note, they can also form sentences. They just don't want to when colloquial speech brings the point across just as well and it's an informal setting. The same is true for most people of all ages in my experience.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 6 points 3 weeks ago

Incredible

Why would they change shapes!? SHAPES IS SHAPES!

[–] butterycroissant@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

honestly not even sure how i remember doing complex math in hs

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

Wasn't this discovered years ago?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

Wake up everyone, a new shape just dropped!

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

Better than rheumatoid stuff.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I thought area was for 2D things, and volume is for 3D things? Or does he mean surface area?

[–] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Surface area. It's Twitter, give people a break.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s Twitter, give people a break.

No. People who still use Twitter/X are already broken...

[–] FridaySteve@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

True, I should have said "lower your expectations" and just left it there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Looks like a pentagon on one side and hexagon on the other, aka soccerball pattern. I would be very surprised if the volumes don't work out close enough just approximating them with [average area of ends] x [length]

load more comments
view more: next ›