this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
818 points (96.9% liked)

memes

18087 readers
1692 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyDarkestTimeline01@ani.social 83 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Pretty sure only aristocrats dressed like that.

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (5 children)

And wasn’t the makeup to hide chlamydia / syphilis etc?

[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago

Sure and perume was becase you didn't bathe ... And yet we still use both

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think it's also for the opposite? I mean, the white face, rosy cheeks and red lips were popularized due to the romantization of tuberculosis. The guy on the left could literally have tuberculosis looking at his face.

One of the many sources: https://historycollection.com/tuberculosis-became-the-victorian-standard-of-beauty/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dumbass@aussie.zone 55 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There is absofukinglutely nothing stopping you from dressing like that, only yourself.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They might try to stop you.

[–] iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As the saying goes, "no gentleman was dressed without his sword"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Konstant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeeeesshhhhhhh

[–] dumbass@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

They will fail to stop you.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

society, jobs, and weather?

[–] MohamedMoney@feddit.org 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Those are bourgeois categories

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunoc@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

Don’t let the prospect of beheading get on the way of your dreams!

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mark Zuckerberg, who dresses pretty much like the guy on the right, then adds a watch worth $100k to indicate his status.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The pants shirts an hoodies the ultra wealthy wear are also often obscenely overpriced versions of the normal clothes. Like Luis Vuitton's plain tshirt, with a same color embossed logo on the front, for 700$. Or this one by Prada for 2500$ (its casmere)

[–] dingus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I legitimately do not understand

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fashion??? In this economy?!

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If I could suit up like in games that actually have good clothing options and don't punish you for just getting every option I totally would, but for better or worse I settle for tattered hand me downs from my uncle that I have been wearing since I was 7 or so. And some hand me ups from my younger siblings that became bigger than me as a top up to the supply.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

That's was really interesting

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Rich cunts then:

Rich cunts now:

Poor cunts then:

Poor cunts now:

Or to put it another way, nothing has changed. The upper classes still dress like wankers who sniff their own farts, and the lower classes still dress with whatever they can afford that works for them.

[–] blimthepixie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (17 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I'm more of a summer/spring in my color scheme

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 7 points 4 weeks ago

Ladies, What's stopping you from dressing like this

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

My penis would dangle out the bottom of the skirt.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Noble vs peasant.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago (5 children)

wasn't the make up meant to hide the lesions and wigs to hide the peeling scalp and hair loss?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Maybe we have grown out as a society of that childish one-upping each other with made up rules?

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Have you met society? Society is a petty bitch!

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Please tell me there’s a /s in there somewhere.

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't you ever insinuate i have boring socks ever again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who's got boring socks? Not me, sir. 😤

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 9 points 1 month ago

The “now” person is a peasant, not man. Put some eyeliner on, at least!

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Try it, you get lots of shit. I'd know.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I do find it weird there's been this resurgence of fixation on superficial motifs being associated with masculinity, but the guys who parrot these views all have an appearance that screams, "I want to blend in and be invisible!"

Nothing masculine about tepid conformity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Rich guys wearing really dour clothes is actually a relatively recent phenomenon in history. Up to the French Revolution the aristocrats were peacocked up to the max; maybe it was fear of the guillotine that saw their successors going around in North Face jackets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beejboytyson@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Remember, the Roman's thought pants were for the effeminate easterners.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

The title is implicitly responding to someone who thinks, "fashion is an important part of masculinity, and it's immutable," but has nothing to say to someone who thinks, "fashion is an important part of masculinity and can change."

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Soktopraegaeawayok@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

That there is a dandy

[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think they dropped a word there. I think "rich" was the word they dropped......

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

that's a part of it, however during the Victorian time. it became fashionable for men to be stoic and boring. that's why a guy can wear the same outfit for a meeting, a wedding, and a funeral.

although wealth is a big factor. it isn't the whole story. a good suit can cost a lot and still be fashionably bankrupt.

And if you try to put some flare, they will question your sexuality and distupt the corporate dynamics.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] biscuitswalrus@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tbh men like me are a step away from becoming cats and I would love to just be a cat. Every step we do that progresses men becoming cats is fine for me.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago

I don't want it to be like it is, but it do

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Call me a sissy but t-shirt and cargo pants for life!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

You've obviously not been to a goth club recently ;)

[–] yyprum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My socks are not boring, excuse me!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›