this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
120 points (99.2% liked)

okmatewanker

1771 readers
3 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French ๐Ÿคฎ

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Unquote0270@programming.dev 41 points 3 months ago (28 children)

Wtf.

It's sickening how the far right agenda has been so normalised that the government is pandering to them.

load more comments (28 replies)
[โ€“] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Iโ€™d rather heโ€™d come out as a nonce than whatever the fuck this is.

Maybe the royals are actually reptilians and they replace anyone dumb enough to be PM

[โ€“] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Imagine how the far right and/or football hooligans must feel seeing their preferred symbol of nationalism be linked to somebody as milquetoast as Starmer ๐Ÿคฃ

Honestly, though, good for Starmer. None of us need to fly a flag - I think we know what country weโ€™re in??? - but I abhor how the far right try to claim it for themselves, and how then anybody who does fly the flag is immediately linked to those bastards.

โ€œIโ€™ve lost Saint George in the Union Jack, thatโ€™s my flag too and I want it back!โ€ - Roots, by Show of Hands.

[โ€“] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago

It's not the far-right's preferred symbol of nationalism. It's our national flag. That's how I look at it, and we should act as such. Labour displaying the Union Flag was ALWAYS the right choice. It's better than his disgraceful predecessor refusing to sing the national anthem.

I know you can say "oooh, his policies though, read his policie-"

The average voter doesn't read the entire manifesto. They just remembered that he was some bloke who wouldn't even sing the national anthem and got cushy with the IRA.

So the choices in the last election were ethno-nationalism or protest vote, got it

[โ€“] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Keir Starmer: seat warmer for Nigel.

[โ€“] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

"Always sits in front of a Union Jack" is pretty weird to be honest. I mean, does he have one draped over the back of every chair the house and over the bed's headboard? Has he had one painted on the underside of the lid of his toilet?

[โ€“] flamingos@feddit.uk 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Little known fact about ol' Keir, but this is what he wears around the house:

Picture of a man at a protest wearing a zentai suit with a Union Jack print while holding a Union Jack flag.

Haha, that's definitely possible.

An alternative is that as he's always in front of the Union Jack... perhaps he simply has a "special personal assistant" dressed like this, who is always behind him in his home?

Keir: "Bring out the special personal assistant"

Servant: "But the special personal assistant's sleeping"

Keir: "Well, I guess you're gonna have to go wake him up now, won't you?"

[โ€“] theo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My thinking was that he sits facing it, like you would sit in front of the TV. But instead of the tele, he is just staring at red, white and blue like a true patriot.

[โ€“] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's a good point! For some reason, I didn't consider that he could be facing it.

[โ€“] theo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

The wonderful ambiguity of the English language. Never has caused any issues before I am sure.

[โ€“] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Obviously he stands to take a shit, no sitting involved there.

[โ€“] flamingos@feddit.uk 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

foocking liebour politisan, its called the UNION FLAG when its on land!

[โ€“] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wikipedia: "It is sometimes asserted that the term Union Jack properly refers only to naval usage, but this assertion was dismissed by the Flag Institute in 2013 after historical investigations."

[โ€“] Skua@kbin.earth 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To continue to explain much too seriously for a shitposting community: a jack in general is a specific type of flag on a ship, specifically the smaller one that flies at the front. It's traditionally only flown in harbour or at anchor

The British one specifically, though, has history messing things up. It actually pre-dates the Acts of Union (or at least the earlier version of it without the St Patrick's cross does) by an entire century. Originally it really was a jack, only for maritime usage, and Scotland and England continued to fly their own flags on land. By the time the Acts of Union made it an actual national flag, everyone had been calling that design a jack for their entire lives anyway, so it just stuck. Both the admiralty and parliament confirmed that either term is acceptable for official use in the early 1900s

[โ€“] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago

I saw you helping your uncle jack off a horse, so I did.

[โ€“] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

Jokes on you he had his home commissioned as a naval vessel

[โ€“] Denjin@feddit.uk 8 points 3 months ago

Hey nige, come here and let me suck that mushroom cock

[โ€“] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 4 points 3 months ago

Hmm. Maybe he's trying to normalise and 'reclaim' the flag for non-racists. That would be a good thing.

[โ€“] Honytawk@feddit.nl 2 points 3 months ago

What is "Union" about that Jack?

[โ€“] Shamber@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

And the Oscar goes to....๐Ÿ˜‘ and morons are clapping ๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, if it will stop people voting reform, I don't see the harm

[โ€“] flamingos@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Come on, no one buys this shit. The people who this is supposed appeal to can see this for the obvious grift it is, no one believes Starmer is being sincere here.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ