this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
565 points (99.1% liked)

Science Memes

17812 readers
1859 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it evaporate in like 5 seconds, then? Also, drainage would be the easiest thing ever. Don't even need a slanted floor.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That'd be awful. You want the stuff in water out of your house, not precipitated all over the floor.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What stuff in water? Are you referring to drainage?

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Minerals, dirt, pathogens, etc.

If you wash your ~~ear~~ raw chicken (you shouldn't), that splatter would be much more evenly spread over every surface it lands on.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Well yeah, I'm not advocating we convert to surface-tensionless water, here. I'm just pointing out the flaw in this meme's logic.

Now on to serious questions, wtf is an ear chicken?

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Auto correct from raw? Otherwise, god help us.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Yes, I will correct.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 23 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a lot less cleaning in the house as it would just evaporate in less than a minute?

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

High humidity tends to ruin a lot of houses/construction materials over time, but you'll likely first notice random spores

[–] Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean you can just ventilate whenever you spill something.

The larger problem would be the entire water-based ecosystem.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 2 points 5 months ago

We need xkcd to explain what would happen on a large scale if water was like this.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Your floor would have to be supernaturally flat and level for that to happen.

[–] sxan@midwest.social 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the world is crooked ! reality is a lie !

[–] meyotch@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Lambs to the cosmic slaughter!

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 3 points 5 months ago

ah yes ! that's the one

[–] schnokobaer@feddit.org 21 points 5 months ago

But that 2 micron puddle would also evaporate in 2 microseconds!

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

We would probably just not exist as liquids that want to hold together are pretty essential. Even if you just imagine blood not leaving your body through the tiniest nick.

[–] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 6 points 5 months ago

I mean maybe? Surface tension play a role in blood staying on the wound, but it’s the blood itself that clots. I think the bigger issue would be your eyes, but maybe evolution creates a light sensor that wasn’t developed underwater…

I’m at a loss. In my heart of hearts I know we all die if water doesn’t tend to hold together, but I can’t think of WHY. Call xkcd.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You could also clean it by putting a cloth in the lowest point it would run to so this sounds like a win to me

[–] yuri@pawb.social 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

i think without surface tension it would also just fall out of the cloth as soon as you lift it, because nothing would wick against gravity. in fact of your floor is pourous at all, i reckon the water would just immediately all flow further down and you’d be left with a dry floor.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oil doesn’t have surface tension and it stays in the cloth. At a certain point it’s not surface tension that keeps liquids together but friction.

Says my uneducated ass.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 4 points 5 months ago

oils have low surface tension, i believe a true no-surface tension liquid is as impossible as a true frictionless surface.

i didn’t consider friction though! i think the rag would still dry out completely pretty quick, but you might have a few seconds while the water falls out depending on how tight the mesh is?

i dunno, this is a real whacky thing to think about!

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Without surface tension it would stick to whatever thing attracts it more. And a normal piece of cloth attracts water way more than a normal non-carpet floor.

But it also wouldn't flow freely as the GP expects either. Some oils have almost no surface tension, and they are famously a nightmare to clean up.

As a positive, the water would evaporate faster.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the cloth attracts it because of the capillary action pulling water into the gaps therein, and capillary action relies on surface tension! i think without outside forces like suction, the liquid in this scenario would never flow against gravity.

i think hahah

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Surface tension doesn't tell you anything about the cloth-water interface.

[–] yuri@pawb.social 2 points 5 months ago

i mean it’s literally why liquids wick into cloth

[–] yuri@pawb.social 1 points 5 months ago

late reply but i ONLY JUST CONSIDERED, the cloth would most likely have some static charge which WOULD result in a literal “attraction force” towards the water!

physics is so stupid, i love it so much

[–] Gwaer@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wouldn’t it just be a superfluid at that point? Those things are ungovernable. We’d have way more problems that just spilled puddles. They crawl out of the beakers on their own. It’d be an absolute nightmare.

My bad superfluids are 0 viscosity not surface tension carry on we’re safe.

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 7 points 5 months ago

good news: it wouldn't be

[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

That's how water works in videogames

[–] vonxylofon@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 5 points 5 months ago

Water just doesn't work in minecraft

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 2 points 5 months ago
[–] sxan@midwest.social 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Would capillary action still work, or does it depend on surface tension? I'm thinking about superfluids. Would the water stop at covering the floor?

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You can try it yourself by adding a drop of dish soap to some water. Capillary action would still work and the water would evaporate long before covering the entire floor.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Capillary rise depends on surface tension, gamma. If surface tension was 0, there would be no capillary rise. Soap decreases surface tension, but it's not 0.

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 2 points 5 months ago

Oh nevermind then. I just looked it up and came across the so-called Rollin film. I don't know if that only appears in helium or if superfluid water would be subject to that effect as well. I wonder how that would impact its behaviour.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Assuming my home is perfectly level, which it is not

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 1 points 5 months ago

speak for yourself

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago

Probably our bodies would instantly collapse into ooze like that guy in the first X-Men.

[–] PillowD@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago
[–] 58008@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

What if each H~2~O molecule was coated in a hydrophobic substance?