this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
568 points (99.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21691 readers
1100 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AskThinkingTim@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

What is the objective behind selling the chocolate bars? I will have to delve deeper into the topic.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 18 points 10 hours ago
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 68 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

Not objecting, but what is the motivation of the Mexican government to do this? Have they done similar things before?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 60 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I don't think they've done something exactly like this, but they have aggressively tackled obesity in recent years, going as far as labeling all foods with excess fats, salt, and sugar. It's very visible on the package and it does influence what I buy.

But this is the way I found out we're doing this now. 😅

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 9 points 9 hours ago

they have aggressively tackled obesity in recent years

Actually doing something? Good on them!

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

But also I think because all the existing cocoa producers are evil enslavers. This will help something like 1800 Mexican farmers.

[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Nestle is notoriously evil - I'm hoping Mexico can compete

[–] NoodlePoint@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

The only thing that EU has yet to stiff-arm on.

[–] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 21 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Government should probably provide the cheapest food and set the standard.

However ideology like this leads to issues in reality.

If a competitor gets lower prices would hint at some questionability. Government correction becomes suppression. Suppression leads to . . .?

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

However ideology like this leads to issues in reality.

Issues for who? The consumer? Or the capitalists?

If a competitor gets lower prices would hint at some questionability.

It would hint that it's a shitty product, presuming no foul play by the government and the product is not overpriced (doesn't appear to be).

Government correction becomes suppression. Suppression leads to . . .?

Government correction how? From suppression I think you mean lowering their price? The scenario you're laying out doesn't make sense.

The point of this kind of product is to be the baseline, no capitalist should be able to afford to offer the same product for less, because the government already has the lowest possible margin.

You start by making a better product, and you can charge whatever people decide the improved product is worth. It's a good thing that an asshole capitalist can't market a $7 bar of chocolate when a very good quality one is $1. At that price difference, your chocolate better be amazing.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Uhh what?

It’s called competition. Having a competitor in the market who’s goal is to keep people fed instead of making money hand over fist would both bring prices down and bring quality up on higher priced items.

If we have to do capitalism, let’s get some not-for-profit competition happening.

[–] sunflowercowboy@feddit.org 1 points 9 minutes ago

In an ideal world, yes that would be the competition. However, in reality if the governance sets the standard, they can have almost always the cheapest prices. Wide reach, built transportation systems and probably incentivized contracts. Essentially everything that fucked up India with the British during ww2.

Well if another company can go lower, it inherently implies they are skimping somewhere so quality is lost or regulations circumvented. Any government correction can overstep.

Go start your not-for-profit competition. Farm for yourself, grow crops at home, reduce your footprint. Find community in your neighborhood.

[–] Brickhead92@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

Less profits for shareholders? And that is unacceptable!

/s

[–] Sagan_Wept@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Damaskox@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

I'd love to have a taste.

Too bad I live in Northern Europe...probably not worth buying via the Internet even if it was possible...

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 200 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (2 children)

American government: Builds concentration camps

Mexican government: Develops brand new chocolate bars

I'm happy to see there are still some governments out there who rule in the interest of the people.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 41 points 15 hours ago

A high quality chocolate bar, at that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 38 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If you haven't had chocolate with vanilla in it, consider trying it. It's my favorite chocolate additive. You need to purge ideas about vanilla being sweet or creamy. It's a tobaccoy rich flavor that adds some depth even to dark chocolate.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

As a kid we'd make our own milkshakes at home and the best ones we came up with were vanilla ice cream with chocolate syrup.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Throw some malt in there!!!

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Since I discovered dark chocolate ice cream, I've been dying for someone to make a dark chocolate and vanilla twist soft serve.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 72 points 18 hours ago

American slop producers in shambles

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

50% is a little low for my taste. I wish it was more like 40 60 80. I'd be going for the 80. Or maybe just 50 & 70. I can live with 70.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Others say it's to fight chiodhood obesity, kids dont tend to like dark/good chocolate.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Idk, my kids love dark chocolate but also I hate milk chocolate so they haven't had much of it.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Well your spawn have unusually good taste. This is not normal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 33 points 17 hours ago

Not the news I was expecting but kind of a cool way to address a variety of issues, like obesity, imports from US, generating revenue, subsidizing a national crop, etc.

load more comments
view more: next ›