this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
283 points (99.6% liked)

politics

24707 readers
2670 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 48 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I take comfort in knowing that, if I live a normal lifespan, Trump will die in my lifetime. Unfortunately, all the hatred and bigotry won't die with him.

[–] J92@lemmy.world 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The cultural relief felt when thatcher died was palpable, and I wasn't even alive when she was actively fucking the country.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

I lived near Brixton, South London. There was an immediate street party.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 22 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

He's absolutely a figurehead. Dozens of people are lining up to be the face of a much bigger fascist coalition.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 8 hours ago

More a disfigurehead amiright?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody else has the ability to be the cult leader that he is. But maybe they'll be entrenched enough that they don't need the cultists' support any more.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Plus, hasn't he pretty well decimated the GOP ranks? Any worthy competitor has been exiled or humiliated or both leaving the ranks filled with only sniveling sycophants and uncharismatic bigots.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The contest won't be over who can imitate Trump the best. It'll be who can use Trump as a martyr best. They all know Trump is the glue that holds their machine together.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Invoking a cult leader as a martyr can only get you so far. I'm unconvinced there's anyone else likely to successfully take on the mantle of cult leader after him. I guess we'll see eventually.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

I'm honestly surprised that the fuck head that he is, has been able to build a cult. He's so fucking good damn repugnant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I have theories about what may happen when Trump inevitably dies. 1. The best case scenario is Trump dies, and his whole empire just slowly fizzles out and goes away. 2. Trump dies, and then the true religion of Trump begins much in the same way as Jesus when he was crucified, and his supporters believed that he will rise from the grave, bringing about a new apocalypse and judgment for the non-believers. 3. Trump dies and a new vicious wave of domestic terrorism breaks out all over the country if not, the globe. 4. Trump dies and his supporters go full Jonestown and commit mass suicide. 5. Trump dies and his supporters believe that he will reincarnate much like the Dalai Lama bringing forth a new group of charlatans and snake oil salesman, believing that they are the reincarnation of Trump starting a new way of life and a new cult of Trump. 6. Trump dies and his supporters do not believe it in and reported sightings of him being alive will exist far after the fact much the same way as Elvis.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Of all the people for the dipshits to rally around, they picked this failed game show host. It's so very much stupider than I could have possibly imagined. I sort of get how they lionized Ronnie Raygun, despite how awful he was for this country and so on....the veneer at least seems halfway decent and he at least pretended to love this country and those that live in it.

Taco has just a complete disregard for everything good about this country and hates everyone. What is there to like about that?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

Well, there are conspiracy theories Hitler didn't die and he fled to Argentina. Even if that were true I think he'd be dead by now

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I’m hoping for 4 but realistically I think it’ll be 5 but with a twist. They’ll have to find and agree to 1 leader, and internal fighting and splitting of the cult will begin. Whether or not they’re able to pick a leader will depend on how long t has left to live - he hasn’t publicly declared who is next in line and there isn’t anyone else that’s anywhere close to leading maga. If he dies today maga will be fucked.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Yes definitely. And in my personal opinion 5 would be the most entertaining outcome.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I believe Trump is just the warm up. Full on religious hegemony is yet to come.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

We are far less religious than any point in recorded history.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That was true for Iran in the 70s, too.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago

And, supposedly, the US government a year ago.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 9 points 10 hours ago

And yet the people in charge of the judiciary are more religiously motivated than they've been in nearly a century.

It doesn't really matter if we as a society are less religious than ever if the people with their hands on the tiller are not. There's a reason they are called reactionaries......

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

100% this is part of p25. The dismantling of the government now will allow this to come into fruition. They’ll continue to remove everyone who won’t align, citizen or not.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 73 points 14 hours ago (12 children)

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

People facing denaturalization get no free lawyer, meaning poor defendants often face the government alone. There’s no jury trial — just a judge deciding whether someone deserves to remain American. The burden of proof is lower — “clear and convincing evidence” instead of “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Most important, there’s no time limit, so the government can go back decades to build cases.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Exactly... don't blame the billionaires, oligarchs, or the criminally corrupt political class... don't blame the 70 million fascists, or the 100 million people who completely ignore politics... or the Democrats who fail to motivate all of them and maintain unwavering support for a genocidal ethnostate... or the 60 million neolib centrists who insist on supporting the lesser of two evils, and reject "radical change" after the 5th "once-in-a-lifetime" crisis in a decade.

Blame the phantom protest voters, without evidence, instead... THIS IS ALL THEIR FAULT.

The "protest voters" are basically "the jews" or "immigrants" scapegoat for liberals. At least you get to enjoy the smell of your own farts while the fascist coup proceeds unabated.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 37 points 13 hours ago

Oh... it's all of the people you mentioned. That doesn't excuse anyone who didn't vote against this

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 24 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Who said I'm blaming? I'm informing protest-non-voters what they voted for. Honestly, that you feel/think blame is telling.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

I'm not American, and I've advised people to vote blue no matter who for over 20 years, so as a foreigner watching America slide towards fascism for decades I can tell you, American liberals are just as much to blame for fascism as the uneducated morons brainwashed by it.

Both parties have been destroying the working classes economic mobility for almost 50 years. Just because 1 party is worse than the other that doesn't absolve either of their sins.

Yet now, at the final hour, you blame a phantom left for not biting the pillow, as though that would've changed the multi-decade fall of the empire.

I tell ya what, though. Just cry harder and blame the left. It's worked for fascism!

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I’d say the big issue was being okay with the status quo for Democrats. A Republican administration would come in, set us back in several regards. Then the Democrats come back into power and shrug things off for a number of issues. For sure there were a number of problems they tried to fix and were focused on, but when the number of votes just aren’t there you gotta focus on the things you can fix. The main issue Democrats have allowed to simmer for some God forsaken reason and has made future problems was not trying to revert/amend the No Child Left Behind policies, the defunding of education, and not trying to bring back and expand the Fairness Doctrine to apply to all social media, including influencers.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

I'm sure there are places on the Internet where you could sell that "ghost" story, but Lemmy during the runup to the election was like 45%+ people arguing for protest votes and vote abstaining as a means of "punishing" Democrats for a millenia-old religious feud on the other side of the world. Obviously this isn't physical, definitive proof that protest voters and abstainers actually moved the electoral needle for Trump, I'm just letting you know why no one's really buying it here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 7 points 12 hours ago

Feeling a little defensive, are we?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 59 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

For most of American history, taking away citizenship has been rare. But it increased dramatically during the 1940s and 1950s during the Red Scare period characterized by intense suspicion of communism. The United States government targeted people it thought were communists or Nazi supporters. Between 1907 and 1967, over 22,000 Americans lost their citizenship this way.

This is why it's not good enough to simply stop doing horrible shit...

We need to change the laws to prevent future admins from abusing them

[–] jhymesba@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Easiest way here is make losing citizenship a criminal charge, with the whole 'appointed lawyer' and 'burden of proof' that designation includes. That's one thing a Dem "Project 2029" should include.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Stop acting like laws can fix fascism. Half of everything Trump, the GOP, and every lobbyists, have ever done is criminal and breaking dozens of existing laws. Laws only matter if they're enforced, otherwise they are chains utilized by fascists to delay an appropriate counter-response.

The only thing that will fix fascism are general strikes large enough to damage the economy and make the capitalist/political class shit they're pants, or violence. None of these psychopaths are going down without a fight.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 40 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I wasn’t aware that “denaturalizing” was an actual thing. Is this something with legal precedent, or just something Stephen Miller has made up.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 41 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Basically, can you afford a court case against the U.S. Government to prove you never made a mistake on paperwork, or someone translating for you didn't make a mistake. Was anything missing from your report you gave 20 years ago when you didn't speak English and they said include the following?

The thing that blows me away is why... It's just money being blown from our taxes, to deport people who pay taxes... In a time period they claim we need higher birth numbers because capitalism demands growth and population growth makes that easier to support the social programs we have left

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They don't even have to do that now.

A few weeks ago SCOTUS ruled that defendents deported from the US illegally would have to separately file cases to overturn their denaturalisation.

So the govt doesn't even need to get a court order to deport anymore.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

While they could do it illegally, the case you have to fund yourself is a civil case against the government to decide whether your naturalization can be removed. Only once it is removed can they deport you as a criminal per the supreme courts ruling. Every person deported prior to the civil court case would be a "fiasco.". Not saying it won't happen, but the Supreme Court so far deems it illegal.

Unless I missed something, where did you see that ruling?

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

They're doing it to punish people they perceive as enemies.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago

It's all about power over people, so they can enrich themselves. They want slaves.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 6 points 12 hours ago

They want to deport brown people. To them that's worth the cost.

[–] hendu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 13 hours ago

There is legal precedent, but since 1968 it's generally only been used on war criminals who lied to gain citizenship. They're going to start expanding what they consider to be "fraud" to include things like spelling mistakes and clerical errors, which is total bullshit. More details are in the article.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The article states

The government can only do this in specific situations. It must prove someone “illegally procured” citizenship by not meeting the requirements, or that they lied or hid important facts during the citizenship process.

So, basically, it all goes back to that person's naturalization process, and the notion that there was something wrong with it. But for this administration, "hiding important facts" might mean "didn't tell us this tiny detail", or "didn't tell us they intended to vote for Liberals"....

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

I wouldn't put it past them to doctor old documents even. If ICE agents are willing to call livestreaming a "violent act" then they can self-justify fudging a document to deport another "invader".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I hate this thumbnail and smug shit eating smile. He definitely sun downing in that picture.

load more comments
view more: next ›