this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
61 points (94.2% liked)

Excellent Reads

2393 readers
1 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Rules:

  1. Common Sense. Civility, etc.
  2. Server rules.
  3. Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Other comms that might be of interest:

  1. !boardgames@sopuli.xyz
  2. !norway@sopuli.xyz

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I never learned this, I can read all the examples easily though. They remind me a bit of Feersum Endjin by Iain M. Banks, and True History of the Kelly Gang by Peter Carey.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zabadoh@ani.social 31 points 5 days ago (6 children)

A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling by Mark Twain probably not

For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all.

Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x" -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli.

Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Ew.

That just turns into Dutch.

No thanks.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 8 points 4 days ago

Found smortys alt account ;-)

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 5 days ago

Reading this caused me physical distress

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Haha I love this. It breaks my brain, but the end result is so much simpler :D

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago

I swear the final product is like how Spaniard kids that don't know english write it.

Soo... Intuitive for Spaniards I guess? Having coherency in the pronunciation of letters isn't a bad thing per se.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fainali, xen...

Hey, you said no x's!

[–] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago

You missed the part where they were reintroduced:

Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x" -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Well, America has been running another experiment for decades that has left a lot of people unable to spell - or do math, or science or think rationally and critically: the destruction of the education system.

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 2 points 5 days ago

If you think of it as a project to destroy teachers' unions who always favor one political party, then it makes more sense.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Here is the title image

Tap for translationIf you are able to read these words, you might have been part of a failed English teaching initiative

[–] MycarHolmes@quokk.au 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

TIL I might have been part of a failed English teaching initiative (despite being born after the 60s and not in England)

[–] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's quite easily readable for me as well.

[–] MycarHolmes@quokk.au 6 points 4 days ago

Yeah, I remember you might have sat next to me.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is it instantaneous for you, or do you have to think about it at all?

The only part I stumbled on briefly was faulld

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Inglish was the only thing to trip me up

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

Hilarious that they misspelled "failed" anyway.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 5 days ago

Ur spelleeng it rong!

[–] zabadoh@ani.social 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

See also New Math from about the same era.

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 5 points 5 days ago

I always think of another New Math.

[–] oracleunity@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

ow, my wernicke's area

[–] Ildar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Вполне можно прочитать