this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
357 points (93.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

35690 readers
896 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 6 points 41 minutes ago

Yes and i would choose to have morals anyway

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Sure but it's lonely at the top. If you rise to the top by backstabbing people, you'll end up exactly how some people right now are, and you keep trying to accumulate more and be great or whatever messing up everything else and being hated.

While a simple life with your loved ones will give you satisfaction. And satisfaction is the key to happiness. Rather satisfaction is the ultimate happiness.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 2 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

It depends where you want to go. Knowledge is always bigger than power, power gives money but knowledge gives depression and suicide thoughts. The fast escape path is obvious.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

House MD Pilot

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Depends what you mean by "further". It is a trait that definitely serves well in some very lucrative areas like business or politics. But it very easy to ruin other aspects of your life like your relationships, your public image, and can run you afoul of the law. In areas of work where your image is paramount, being a liar and manipulator usually only gets you so far because it's very hard to maintain those lies and hide the manipulation under massive public scrutiny, particularly if you're doing illegal stuff in addition to it. Of course the wealthier you are, or the more fanatical your following, the more you will have others lie and manipulate on your behalf, so... accountability can decrease that way.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 55 minutes ago (1 children)

it very easy to ruin other aspects of your life like your relationships, your public image, and can run you afoul of the law.

Not when you succeed to the level that you can ignore the laws - which isn't just one man in the US, not by a long shot.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 22 minutes ago

That's why I included the last bit. The law is more relevant when you are not someone too special. The higher you get, the less it matters, if only because more people have fallen for your manipulations or are cognizant of them but support them for whatever reason, and will defend you no matter what from actual justice.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

This is only true in a world that is mostly full of people with morals. A society built on lying and manipulation inevitably collapses - look at what is happening to the United States. They elected an amoral lying manipulator and in just six months their society is unraveling. They just passed a law that took money away from hungry children and sick people so that their psychopathic leader can better persecute his enemies: that is, anyone who opposes him. ICE just became the best-funded "law" enforcement agency ever created. It is obvious to everyone except a handful of naive idiots that ICE will be used against US citizens to consolidate MAGA's power in an attempt to create a permanent regime. These states always collapse sooner or later, though, because morality is the foundation of law. No one is going to invest in a country where their assets can be seized and they can be imprisoned on the caprice of a senile madman. You can't have trade without trust - all that is left in places like the US are predators and prey.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This unraveling has been going on a lot longer than just six months. It's been accelerating hard since the Patriot Act after 9/11. And even before that, Republicans had been lying about their support of free markets for generations.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 hours ago
[–] plyth@feddit.org 5 points 2 hours ago

That depends on how much people with morals stick together. People are isolated so that they can be manipulated.

[–] JPSound@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

Depends on how you define "further". I'd like to leave this earth knowing I had a positive impact on those i met while I was here. I can sleep easy at night, even dispte all the hardships in my life atm, knowing I'm doing the best with what it is I have. Also, in my early 30's, I started to really internalize the, "having nice things means keeping things nice" i.e. you don't need new shiny things all the time. Take care of what you already have and you'll never be without.

I can't lie and manipulate my way into being a kind and honorable man, friend, son and brother. Me achieving those things brings me greater peace of mind and satisfaction than anything I'd ever need to lie my way into to get.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 3 hours ago

Unless you meet someone like me, who does not wait for aithorities to resolve things.

My co-workers did that literally hours ago, admited everything within moments.

[–] Eknz@lemmy.eknz.org 14 points 5 hours ago

It may seem this way at times, however, it really depends on the system you're participating in.

Have a play around with: The evolution of trust - https://ncase.me/trust/

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Really depends on where you are. These people won't get as far in stable communities where people know and talk to each other. If you are doing these things habitually as a way to get ahead, eventually everyone will figure out what is going on and will, at the very least, exclude you from the group.

This pattern is the case with most people who are especially dickish or unpleasant in one way or another. Sure, a very small number of them gain power and influence in the world at large. But most of them live shitty lives. They have few friends, and the friends they do have are shitty like them. They have no money, because they have trouble getting and keeping jobs - even low paying ones. When they manage to find romantic partners, the relationships tend to be tumultuous, since the only people they can attract are just as shitty as they are.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Especially in today's sociopolitical climate

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago

Especially in today’s sociop~~olitical~~athic climate

[–] benni@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

It makes a lot of sense. Lying and manipulation are done specifically to achieve goals. A defining characteristic of morals is that you're supposed to follow them even if it's neutral or disadvantageous for you. If someone follows "morals" to achieve a personal goal, they're not actually following morals, they're just acting in a way that incidentally looks moral.

[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

That depends on how shallow you want your life to be.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 4 hours ago

I wish this wasn't true, but it's tragic that it is.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely true and stating otherwise is just crowd control.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

See, we used to exile those types. Modern society lost that ability and now we have CEOs.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 114 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

I've got 2 kids in primary school. We teach them to be kind and caring, that cheaters never win. That bullies are bullies because they are not happy.

However a study came out that compared bullies and non bullies. Bullies kids are more likely to be successful financially and socially based on studies. I was sad for humanity when o found out.

It makes sense, in the same way that it makes sense that CEO's are more likely to be sociopaths. Human brains are made for small societies. When it's a larger society, negative traits can be helpful to get ahead. It's likely part of the reason we experience wars and famine and billionaires.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

I was curious about the studies. The only thing I came across about outcomes was this BMJ review that says:

Bullies were more likely to have trouble keeping a job and honouring financial obligations. They were more likely to be unemployed.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I'd also want to see the same methodology when assessing being happy, have many close friends you can trust etc.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 4 hours ago

successful financially and socially

Going around with a machete makes you more successful predator. Being successful financially doesn't mean shit and neither does having followers on social media.

[–] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@fedia.io 65 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I love you put billionaires next to other disasters

[–] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

In many ways billionaires are worse than the other disasters listed.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 hours ago

Mostly because people aspire to be billionaires. Society would be much better off if people aspired to be hurricanes.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That is unless the bully messes with the wrong person and gets the shit beaten out of them.

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And then they become adults and find different ways to mess with people, hire bodyguards, expensive lawyers, group up with other corrupt people who find joy in people suffering, shit in their diapers under their suit, etc.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

End them all.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 23 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yay capitalism! Perfect reasoning not to feel bad lying on a resume.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If they can lie about the company and position, I can lie about my experience and fit.

I'm starting to think of writing down the specific things job recruiters tell me, and bringing it to the interview. The last recruiter that reached out (and succeeded in hiring me) told me things that didn't end up being true. When I got hired and was told contradictory information, the company said, "Oh, that is still true, but this particular case is an exception. We can get you a different case where that is true," and then they didn't get back to me for weeks. In that time, I'd applied, interviewed, and accepted a job elsewhere. Fuck lying employers.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Yup and add intelligence to the list as well. Smart means nothing if you can't back it up with being an amoral pile of shit that takes advantage of people every opportunity you get.

[–] realitista@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you are smart, you can afford the luxury of not being a complete piece of shit if you get into the right career.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 hours ago

I feel like that has got to be pretty difficult unless you include jobs where you are personally isolated from and ignorant of the harmful things the company you contribute to is doing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 55 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (15 children)

Maybe, but it also means that you'll be alone for eternity and will never have true friends or camaraderie, and that by itself will consume you.

There is only so many people you can do that to before everyone else catches on and shuns you. All the evil people in the world don't have any friends and are subject to betrayals and threats in their lives constantly. To me, that's not a bearable existence. Sure, you got power, but you're miserable and afraid all the time. Was that really worth it?

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 47 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn't seem to bother the kind of people being described

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Does Muskrat seem like a happy and balanced individual to you? What about Coked up Bezos or AI Zuckerberg?

[–] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Zuckbot seems legitimately happy now after being less involved with the company and pursuing personal goals

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 19 points 11 hours ago (8 children)

you’ll be alone for eternity and will never have true friends or camaraderie, and that by itself will consume you.

I AM a morally decent person who makes efforts to do the right thing. And that last part is STILL true!

I just don't like most people.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Fletcher@lemmy.today 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

One doesn't do the right thing to be rewarded or to 'get ahead'. One does the right thing because it's the right thing to do. Selfishness only leads to insecurity and loneliness.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›