this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
462 points (99.8% liked)

News

30741 readers
2983 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Where have I heard this before?

The Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for Sexual Science) was an early private sexology research institute in Germany from 1919 to 1933. The name is variously translated as Institute for Sexual Research, Institute of Sexology, Institute for Sexology, or Institute for the Science of Sexuality. The Institute was a non-profit foundation situated in Tiergarten, Berlin. It was the first sexology research center in the world.

The Institute was headed by Magnus Hirschfeld, who since 1897 had run the world's first homosexual organization Wissenschaftlich-humanitäres Komitee (Scientific-Humanitarian Committee), which campaigned on progressive and rational grounds for LGBT rights and tolerance at the start of the first homosexual movement that would flourish in interwar Weimar culture. The Committee published the long-running journal Jahrbuch für sexuelle Zwischenstufen. Hirschfeld built a unique library at the institute on gender, same-sex love and eroticism.

The institute pioneered research and treatment for various matters regarding gender and sexuality, including gay, transgender, and intersex topics. In addition, it offered various other services to the general public: this included treatment for alcoholism, gynecological examinations, marital and sex counseling, treatment for venereal diseases, and access to contraceptive treatment. It offered education on many of these matters to both health professionals and laypersons.

After the Nazis gained control of Germany in the 1930s, the institute and its libraries were destroyed as part of a Nazi government censorship program by youth brigades, who burned its books and documents in the street.

One estimate says that between 12,000 to 20,000 books and journals, and even larger number of images and sex subjects, were destroyed. Another estimate says that about 25,000 books were destroyed.

This included artistic works, rare medical and anthropological documents, and charts concerning cases of intersexuality which were prepared for the International Medical Congress, among other things. A collection of works about sexuality, in any one place, similar to the one stored at the institute was not compiled until the founding of the Kinsey Institute in 1947.

They're literally just running it back, the mad lads.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

"Interestingly, Trump had posted on Truth Social on June 20 that Harvard had “acted extremely appropriately” during negotiations and that he was close to a “Deal” with the university that would “be ‘mindbogglingly’ HISTORIC, and very good for our Country.”

Wow, what kind of a retarded person is this?

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 17 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Don’t worry - the US government is very concerned about women’s health! They even made a website!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It seems to be a common thing, couching misogyny in the language of "protecting" or "defending" women. This stuff makes my skin crawl.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

is like 'burning the Library of Congress'

Don't fucking give them any ideas

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Definitely lots of woke material in there.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago

God forbid they find out what the founding fathers actually thought

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Can these samples be transported to another facility in a stable democracy?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 day ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

things like this have already been happening for months

I read in Dutch news papers that Dutch scientists are working closely with their US counterparts to copy, save, and rescue as much data as possible

It's such a sad state of affairs but then again, IDGAF. Americans chose this, deal with it. Your country is over, you're done for. Once you lose science and scientists, you're building your own end.

[–] cygnus@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I wish Canada were doing more of that. We're in such a natural place to poach the "good ones" but there doesn't seem to be any concerted effort.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

It costs money, which the EU has a lot more than Canada

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

I am so happy to hear this. I hope that hackers are able to get in through the many backdoors that have been left open now, too. Please anyone and everyone, get the scientific data before it's deleted.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago

you shit your pants, now lay in it

As it were

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

I'm sure it would somehow be considered antisemitic and blocked.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Just like we did with CERN.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago

In a related story, President Donald Trump has personally set fire to the Library of Congress. As he has previously cancelled funding for, and disbanded, all fire services in the Washington DC area, the raging inferno burns unchecked.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yet all of that priceless data may soon be discarded due to President Donald Trump’s ongoing feud with Harvard

Willett and his team were left scrambling to find the funds needed to protect freezers stocked with stool, urine and DNA specimens gathered from thousand of nurses for nearly five decades. Just the liquid nitrogen needed to keep the specimens frozen costs thousands of dollars a month.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump will destroy it because it's icky stuff relating to women, and it serves to help women.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Now that I think about it, Harvard has what the biggest endowment in history by far? It's peanuts for them to preserve it.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Prosecute like one of those fancy French girls?
(Marie Antoinette for example)

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Fuck, are we going to have to crowdfund this? At least with CNN reporting on it there's enough awareness they might secure alternative sources, but this is getting fucking insane.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 day ago

I honestly would not be surprised if any attempt to save these samples, or in fact to defend any of the other scientific progress being discarded, was met with a harsh reprisal.

Like, they're intentionally going over the top destroying these institutions and data to provoke a reaction, this drawing their awake adversaries or if the woodwork. (And, since they're so opposed to being "woke", one just assume they're sleepwalking through life...)

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago

An opportunity for billionaires to save the day. They won’t.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

fucking reprehensible